Jump to content

Covid-19 Megathread


Loki

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
1 hour ago, Loki said:

This will be the crucial bit that I hope @PunkStep's employers have factored in.  If you want people to WFH I think you should contribute to their internet/electricity bills, and also supply them with all the equipment they need.

We should know more next week but the question was asked a few weeks ago (hypothetically) and the board's response was positive- so I imagine they will. The amount they'll be saving on three floors of office space in the city will be mahoosive for a start. They're approving requests for anything at the moment in terms of equipment and home office furniture. 

Can't be easy working out utility bill contributions though, so not sure how they'll work that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
14 minutes ago, PunkStep said:

We should know more next week but the question was asked a few weeks ago (hypothetically) and the board's response was positive- so I imagine they will. The amount they'll be saving on three floors of office space in the city will be mahoosive for a start. They're approving requests for anything at the moment in terms of equipment and home office furniture. 

Can't be easy working out utility bill contributions though, so not sure how they'll work that out.

This is really interesting and not something I’d considered for the past seven weeks or so!

I wouldn’t have thought it’d be too difficult.  Likely on an allowance basis, so for my tax return for example, I don’t have to supply unit usage, I claim a set amount each month for utilities usage based on the hours I do - there’s official guidance I’m too lazy to find and link to - It’s a goodwill system for sure, but surely still way more economical for them given what you’ve said.

Edited by John Matrix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The logical counterargument to bill contributions for WFHers I think will be that the increase in utility bills would be offset by the reduction in travel costs. I walked to work so I was unaffected in that sense, but my wife would pay £100-150 a month on either trains or petrol depending on the work car park situation. So technically that's been money in her pocket for the past two months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tricky one isn't it, as obviously every one pays different amounts to travel to work, and everyone pays different amounts for utility bills.

I'm sure HR departments up and down the country are drafting WFH policies that benefit their employees first and foremost. That's what they're there for after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

I think people's additional cost of electricity and WiFi will be broadly similar, whereas travel costs can vary wildly from one to another. For example, one of my team pays £3.5k a year for an annual train ticket, whereas one of my team walks 10 mins to the office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SuperBacon said:

Tricky one isn't it, as obviously every one pays different amounts to travel to work, and everyone pays different amounts for utility bills.

I'm sure HR departments up and down the country are drafting WFH policies that benefit their employees first and foremost. That's what they're there for after all.

If its me, I'd refuse to contribute to bills. WFH policies should provide IT, perhaps chairs and desks following a workstation risk assessment, but what people pay on bills they save on travel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MPDTT said:

If its me, I'd refuse to contribute to bills. WFH policies should provide IT, perhaps chairs and desks following a workstation risk assessment, but what people pay on bills they save on travel. 

HR: "We always put the employee first"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
3 minutes ago, MPDTT said:

If its me, I'd refuse to contribute to bills. WFH policies should provide IT, perhaps chairs and desks following a workstation risk assessment, but what people pay on bills they save on travel. 

Did you not read the previous posts, or are you just being a twat for the sake of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

I’m pretty sure you can claim some sort of wfh allowance through a tax return, but obviously that’s a pain if you just have one income which is PAYE. I don’t think there’s any obligation for employers to pay anything towards it. Travel costs are completely irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
17 minutes ago, MPDTT said:

If its me, I'd refuse to contribute to bills. WFH policies should provide IT, perhaps chairs and desks following a workstation risk assessment, but what people pay on bills they save on travel. 

Since travel isn't factored into most people's reward packages anyway (to use some HR-speak), it shouldn't have any bearing on a change in workplace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

I don't really get what a Spoons protest is supposed to achieve. If it's ostensibly to protest Tim Martin for kicking his workers out of their jobs at a time of pandemic and if it were successful and really hurt his profit margins, wouldn't that simply result in pub closures and many of those same staff people were supposed to be protesting in support of then losing their jobs at a time of pandemic? Seems a bit counter-productive to me. 

Must admit I do love Wetherspoons. Real ale for £1.99 and a great selection of lagers for bargain prices. Food's fine too if you're looking for something quick to scran before a gig. 

Edited by SpiritOfTheForest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SpiritOfTheForest said:

I don't really get what a Spoons protest is supposed to achieve. If its ostensibly to protest Tim Martin for kicking his workers out of their jobs at a time of pandemic and if it were successful and really hurt his profit margins, wouldn't that simply result in pub closures and many of those same staff people were supposed to be protesting in support of then losing their jobs at a time of pandemic? Seems a bit counter-productive to me. 

Different staff would lose their jobs if Wetherspoons closed down because the original staff all got sacked at the first given opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...