Jump to content

CM Punk chat


LaGoosh

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
52 minutes ago, SuperBacon said:

Seeing as no one here works for AEW (apart from Carbomb) we'll never know how much he was involved but from how it reads he was just on a committee as an employee. The way that cunt Sapp makes it read is he was solely responsible. Fuck him.

Not exactly a big revelation is it?

Not only is it not a big revelation, everyone reasonable is in agreement that Punk should have been terminated from AEW, so I don't see why this is a story at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, SuperBacon said:

Seeing as no one here works for AEW (apart from Carbomb) we'll never know how much he was involved but from how it reads he was just on a committee as an employee. The way that cunt Sapp makes it read is he was solely responsible. Fuck him.

Not exactly a big revelation is it?

Seems to me that Danielson was chosen as a senior member of the roster in the same job role as Punk. Also, without an obvious conflict of interest. Wasn't at Wembley. Wasn't there for Brawl Out.

The new head of legal would have an understanding of the contractual situation and business of the company.

The outside counsel was probably the one that ran the meeting(s). Simply because you'd hope they have previous experience of this sort of thing and a specialist in employment/labour law with the kind of questions that move things along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

Of course Danielson was involved in the decision, he's Tony's right hand man and I can imagine, I trusted and level headed member of the locker room, why would you not ask for his (or someone from the locker room) to have a say in something that would affect the whole locker room?

The faux outrage to the 'revelation' is completely laughable. Also hilarious that it's come out now, Fightful must be itching for those clicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
52 minutes ago, Snitsky's back acne said:

Punk won in the end. 

He certainly did. He was only ever playing the long game to finally get his win back from Joe, which he did in front of the biggest audience imaginable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's newz, obviously, but I'd be genuinely so excited for this. Overproduced? Full of snarky promos? Reigns goes over? Don't care.

It's like a really weird dream feud that seemed all but unthinkable. The current man versus the guy who was sort of but not really the man. Both from the same era but only sort of. It's just such an odd dynamic that makes complete sense still. So much you could do here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gay as FOOK said:

It's newz, obviously, but I'd be genuinely so excited for this. Overproduced? Full of snarky promos? Reigns goes over? Don't care.

It's like a really weird dream feud that seemed all but unthinkable. The current man versus the guy who was sort of but not really the man. Both from the same era but only sort of. It's just such an odd dynamic that makes complete sense still. So much you could do here. 

 

Punk wins the Rumble

Uses his title shot at EC in Feb, beats Seth at the said event.

Super Duper Unified Undisputed World Universal WWE Title match at Mania -  CM Punk vs Roman Reigns.

I'm here for it.

Edited by The King of Old School
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

All the talk of Rollins vs Punk for the WWE Other World Heavyweight Championship at Mania.. there's still the small matter of Priest running around as the briefcase wanker to be resolved. I think Judgment Day will implode, likely costing Priest the belt when he cashes in, and it will be Balor vs Priest at Mania.

Anyone see Priest actually winning the belt and Rollins vs Punk being with no title involved at Mania?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kinky Auntie Undertaker needs to walk himself into a bin and not come out.

It’s like if Money in the Bank existed during the late 90’s, and the spectre of Headbanger Mosh was haunting the main event scene of Rock, Austin, Mankind et al 

Just fuck off a bit, mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

Does Punk v Rollins need the title, probably not. It would give it more justification for going on later on the card though. If Seth is losing the title he isn't going to want it to be to Punk, and OBP isn't likely to want a secondary world championship anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
21 hours ago, d-d-d-dAz said:

that Kinky Undertaker has the Money in the Bank case. They should get that off him ASAP.

 

8 minutes ago, d-d-d-dAz said:

I think Kinky Auntie Undertaker needs to walk himself into a bin and not come out.

its-not-going-to-happen-rachel-mc-adams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...