Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted
1 hour ago, SuperBacon said:

Oh a job in finance should be easy if you really want one

Yeah you just get your Dad to get you in the door and find some cuck to do all your work for you under threat of them being fired before riding a series of promotions to the top. Easy.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Paid Members
Posted

It's literally about giving trans people a crumb of dignity in their lives and they're willing to the fuck the union over it. Just evil. 

  • Paid Members
Posted

This'll play straight into the SNP's hands, some of the replies are awful. 

Posted

Tories claim the only reason they're vetoing the bill is that it creates inconsistency between Scottish services and those in the rest of the UK.

Well that's a two-way street, isn't it? Maybe, just maybe, it's not Scotland charging too far ahead but the other nations lagging too far behind.

Another way to attempt to resolve that inconsistency would be to check whether, in 2023, the other nations are ready to catch up with Scotland and enact similar bills of their own.

But no, that wouldn't give anyone the satisfaction of treading on trans people at the first opportunity.

  • Paid Members
Posted

There's already inconsistency between Scotland and the rest of the UK anyway, surely? It's had its own legislature and frameworks for centuries, some of which differentiates from that of England & Wales.

  • Moderators
Posted

It's not about inconsistency, the test is whether it will have an 'adverse effect' on UK-wide law. Not close to this but I'm yet to see a convincing argument to support this if there is one.

The articles I've seen on this are too readily conflating criticism of the bill by uk ministers and Scottish Tories (which are irrelevant, because it's a devolved issue that's been approved by Scottish parliament) and whether or not the bill as its written meets this (admittedly very vague) test and if so how.

Posted
10 hours ago, Carbomb said:

There's already inconsistency between Scotland and the rest of the UK anyway, surely? It's had its own legislature and frameworks for centuries, some of which differentiates from that of England & Wales.

It lost that between 1707 and 1999, but kept its own judicial system and less hierarchical established Church, and managed to set up a different education system in the middle of that period even without a Parliament.

But devolution isn't proper decentralisation anyway. Power devolved is power retained. But the media has successfully made voters in this country have an instant negative reaction to the word 'federal' despite federalism apparently being good enough for Canada, Brazil, Australia etc. 

Worst of all, the issue on which the Tories have chosen to break the 24-year settlement isn't even a unionist vs independence one. They've struck down a law which was agreed upon by the SNP, Labour, Greens and Lib Dems – and which the Conservatives would've backed 6 years ago too under Davidson, before they tactically decided trans people were to be the target of choice for fearmongering, bigotry and hatred in the latest round of culture wars, in order to convince enough people to carry on voting against their own interests. This won't end well.

  • Paid Members
Posted

Pour yourself a drink and enjoy the replies to tone-deaf Zahawi wishing everyone a prosperous Chinese New year. It goes as well as you'd expect. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...