Guest Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Buy in’s are for PPV’s as a way to try and entice people to buy the PPV. They have used them for tv as well to get viewers ready to watch the tv show . Suzuki vs Danielson was on the last one Edited January 8, 2022 by Louch Quote
poetofthedeed Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, Louch said: They have used them for tv as well to get viewers ready to watch the tv show . Suzuki vs Danielson was on the last one Wasn't that directly against smackdown doing a 30 minute overrun? Quote
The King Of Swing Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 26 minutes ago, Keith Houchen said: Something for the Charlotte fans? You’ve got my interest at last, Tone! Haters gonna hate. Quote
Infinity Land Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 I did see a comment by a elsewhere from just a random that might make sense. The timing of Battle of the Belts wasn't exactly AEW ideas and something pushed on them by TNT. In a way I could see that making sense AEW prioritising the debut of Dynamite in the same week, and there was the initial uncertainty discussion over whether it would be only an hour. Quote
The King Of Swing Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 Hoping it's one of them shows that over delivers but I can definitely see it being a bit of a damp squid. Quote
Infinity Land Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 1 minute ago, poetofthedeed said: Wasn't that directly against smackdown doing a 30 minute overrun? The 30 minute overrun went against Rampage. The idea of the Buy In was to compete against the 2nd hour of Smackdown to either hold viewers for Rampage or take them away from Smackdown depending on your point of view. Quote
poetofthedeed Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 Just now, Infinity Land said: The 30 minute overrun went against Rampage. The idea of the Buy In was to compete against the 2nd hour of Smackdown to either hold viewers for Rampage or take them away from Smackdown depending on your point of view. Yes, now I remember. Quote
King Coconut Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 12 minutes ago, The King Of Swing said: a damp squid The worst bastard kind. Quote
Guest Posted January 8, 2022 Posted January 8, 2022 37 minutes ago, The King Of Swing said: Hoping it's one of them shows that over delivers but I can definitely see it being a bit of a damp squid. Most of them are damp given where they live Quote
Paid Members WeeAl Posted January 9, 2022 Paid Members Posted January 9, 2022 Hook is the man. I really enjoyed the main event too, bar Jericho's appearance. The commentary was pulled down massively this week with Jericho on board. If Dynamite is Excalibur, Ross and big Tone, then Rampage needs to be Excalibur, Taz and maybe a constantly rotating third wheel if they really want to try out others in the spot. Starks is better than Jericho and Henry, sure, but let's not confuse that for him actually being good at commentary. Quote
The King Of Swing Posted January 9, 2022 Posted January 9, 2022 Bin the Men of The Year shite and get Lambert on commentary for Rampage. Quote
Merzbow Posted January 10, 2022 Posted January 10, 2022 King of Rampage, Hook has been papped with his face deep in a dancers arse. Quote
Paid Members gmoney Posted January 10, 2022 Paid Members Posted January 10, 2022 I wonder if he offered her crisps. Quote
69MeDon Posted January 10, 2022 Posted January 10, 2022 No backstage video games for HOOK. Undertaker would be proud. Quote
Paid Members I Bent My Wookie Posted January 10, 2022 Paid Members Posted January 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Merzbow said: King of Rampage, Hook has been papped with his face deep in a dancers arse. As well as hanging out with Antonio Brown. Just put all the belts on him now. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.