Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
15 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:

I'd go along to that if i was as local to it as you are.. 

It's just the fact that it's a musical that puts me off. Anything ripping the piss out of Spiv Tony is welcome otherwise.

  • Paid Members
Posted

I hate musicals generally, but Blowfish Theatre did a cracking one called 'Boris The Musical' that was pretty funny. They, admittedly, went to the well a bit and did parts 2 and 3, as well as a Trunp version.

  • Paid Members
Posted
On 2/18/2022 at 6:49 PM, DavidB6937 said:

Ugh. Had to check if that stupid Nan movie was real because I couldn't understand why anyone would give that the go ahead. Bloody hell.

 

So it looks like the original Nan movie has been Snydered when they turned it in back in 2019 and the film was reshot and written to appeal to the lowest common denominator. No wonder Brett Goldstein was very quiet about it https://bleedingcool.com/movies/gossip-catherine-tate-the-nan-movie-josie-rourke-cut/

#releasetheroukecut

Posted
1 hour ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

So it looks like the original Nan movie has been Snydered when they turned it in back in 2019 and the film was reshot and written to appeal to the lowest common denominator. No wonder Brett Goldstein was very quiet about it https://bleedingcool.com/movies/gossip-catherine-tate-the-nan-movie-josie-rourke-cut/

#releasetheroukecut

I’m more shocked that it’s taken £564,471 at the box office. Obviously that’s still a disaster, but that’s still about half a million quid more than I expected it to make

Posted
14 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said:

So it looks like the original Nan movie has been Snydered when they turned it in back in 2019 and the film was reshot and written to appeal to the lowest common denominator. No wonder Brett Goldstein was very quiet about it https://bleedingcool.com/movies/gossip-catherine-tate-the-nan-movie-josie-rourke-cut/

#releasetheroukecut

It's an interesting article and it's interesting that the original director isn't credited but I'm still not going to see it.

  • Paid Members
Posted
9 minutes ago, CL Punk said:

It's an interesting article and it's interesting that the original director isn't credited but I'm still not going to see it.

There is nothing in the article that suggests anyone should, in fact the complete opposite if anything

  • Paid Members
Posted
20 hours ago, WyattSheepMask said:

I’m more shocked that it’s taken £564,471 at the box office. Obviously that’s still a disaster, but that’s still about half a million quid more than I expected it to make

How's it a disaster? It's actually quite respectable for a British and Irish only release during the pandemic.

Posted
On 3/28/2022 at 11:50 PM, Thunderplex said:

I wasn’t wrong.  Fuck me, it was terrible.  Only lasted 15 minutes.

What was that BBC Three sitcom marketed solely on the premise of “written by young people for young people”? This was on a par with that.

The funniest thing about it was the ITV Hub app glitching and giving me 10 straight minutes of adverts

  • Paid Members
Posted
2 hours ago, WyattSheepMask said:

“written by young people for young people”

TiredMetallicCero-max-1mb.gif

  • Paid Members
Posted
4 hours ago, WyattSheepMask said:

What was that BBC Three sitcom marketed solely on the premise of “written by young people for young people”?

Coming of Age?

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...