Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He doesn't need people to defend him (other than lawyers), he just needs people to put aside their distaste while continuing to engage with his product.

Posted
1 minute ago, Uncle Zeb said:

He doesn't need people to defend him (other than lawyers), he just needs people to put aside their distaste while continuing to engage with his product.

Which they will. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Weezenal said:

Completely separate to this. Can someone post a completely random Wikipedia page below, maybe someone released in 2005.

I'm sure if you Searched you would find the relevant Diva.

  • Paid Members
Posted

I see who it is now. It was an unexpected release. 

Posted

It's easy to deduce who it is, based on the timeline and comments that person has made about the release in the years since. 

Obviously, this stuff is likely only the tip of the iceberg, since it only covers the last sixteen years. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jacko said:

Am I right in thinking it was the pregnant wrestler release ?

Nope. She was not 'demoted' before her contract wasn't 'renewed'. She was fired while on maternity leave and then successfully sued the company, reaching an out-of-court settlement in 2007.

Also, she was released in a mass talent cull. Her name being listed wouldn't have been surprising, had she not been pregnant at the time, since her role had noticeably diminished beginning at the start of that year.

Posted

Is there a reason nobody is actually posting a name?  Cos I have no fucking idea who you're talking about.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Loki said:

Is there a reason nobody is actually posting a name?  Cos I have no fucking idea who you're talking about.

Look it up somewhere if you want. Don't think people want to out them I guess. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
59 minutes ago, Duke said:

I'm sure if you Searched you would find the relevant Diva.

I'm on a wrestling forum not Google.

Posted

This is UKFF, not a published newspaper.  There's no legal jeopardy for speculating.  Considering all the nonces we've had through here over the years, this seems like an odd time to be coy!

Google's not revealing anything to me, it could be one of half-a-dozen ladies released in 2005.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Loki said:

This is UKFF, not a published newspaper.  There's no legal jeopardy for speculating.  Considering all the nonces we've had through here over the years, this seems like an odd time to be coy!

Google's not revealing anything to me, it could be one of half-a-dozen ladies released in 2005.

Then just use the scenario and imagine its one of them, job done. Hope the fucker goes down in flames but he won't. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
3 minutes ago, Loki said:

Google's not revealing anything to me, it could be one of half-a-dozen ladies released in 2005.

Google's just a big old Diva Search if you ask me. Makes your hair turn red.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...