Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Gus, that's a cool fact but I'm not sure it checks out. Even if the parents of each generation gave birth at the age of 50, that would mean the first child was born in 1840, and the grandchildren born in 1890. That would make the grandchildren 128 years old.

Actually decided to google it. Curiosity got the better of me. The ages were 75 and and 63 respectively when they had their children. That's some longevity of sexual activity, especially considering the shorter lifespans back then. Blimey. 

  • Paid Members
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Undefeated Steak said:

Gus, that's a cool fact but I'm not sure it checks out. Even if the parents of each generation gave birth at the age of 50, that would mean the first child was born in 1840, and the grandchildren born in 1890. That would make the grandchildren 128 years old.

Actually decided to google it. Curiosity got the better of me. The ages were 75 and and 63 respectively when they had their children. That's some longevity of sexual activity, especially considering the shorter lifespans back then. Blimey. 

Aye, the Tyler menfolk evidently were packing heat. Even with unbelievably poor standards of contraception, it's a phenomenal record.

Edited by Gus Mears
  • Paid Members
Posted
23 hours ago, WyattSheepMask said:

TIL...Today marks the 10th anniversary of Kofi Kingston's WWE debut and Heath Ledger's death

Which did you prefer?

  • Paid Members
Posted

TIL...Dave Gorman portrayed Jon the Postman in 24 Hour Party People. Would never have guessed it, he sounds and looks completely different.

  • Paid Members
Posted

I've just watched it on YouTube and I still couldn't believe it, so I had to read his website to confirm (which I'm sure you've also just done!)

  • Paid Members
Posted

He looks so young. Well, it was 20 years ago.

  • Paid Members
Posted

I knew the bumps were there but it never occurred to me that that's what they're for. I'm a touch typist anyway so I've never really had a need for such a thing. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
8 hours ago, SpursRiot2012 said:

I knew the bumps were there but it never occurred to me that that's what they're for. I'm a touch typist anyway so I've never really had a need for such a thing. 

They’re there specifically for touch-typists, so you can find your “home” keys again without having to look at the keyboard.

  • Paid Members
Posted

Even knowing that, and being a touch typist, I've never used them for that purpose.

I worked as a PA a few years back, and I'd do most of my work on my laptop, but would occasionally have to jump across to one of my boss' Apple Macs to send an e-mail from his account. The slight difference in keyboard size/layout would more often than not mean that I'd be chatting away whilst typing out an email, look to the screen, and see that I'd manage to hit the key above every single one I was aiming for, and just written a stream of gibberish.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...