The King Of Swing Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 Won't be long until the screw job comes up then.
Paid Members JNLister Posted January 2, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 2, 2017 Nope, they're going to do at least two other topics first...
Paid Members PunkStep Posted January 2, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 2, 2017 Who's Peter Rosenberg? Three hours of Raw seems interesting. They're clearly aware of its hindrance, Triple H covered it during the Stone Cold podcast.
Paid Members Onyx2 Posted January 2, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 2, 2017 That's really surprising they would address that so up front. It's a one thing for Triple H to mention it, another for multiple panellists to dedicate a WWE show to it.
Ambulance Chaser Posted January 2, 2017 Posted January 2, 2017 Rosenberg is a Radio host on one of the big stations in New York aint he, as well as a big Wrestling fan, i think he is in the Sam Roberts club of being granted access to WWE talent and being in the company's good graces as he does not really outright trash the booking and that. From what i have seen and heard of him he seems decent enough, got that dry jew humour thing going on.
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted January 2, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 2, 2017 Interesting choice of debaters. It's like Paul E. = the smarks and JBL = Vince McMahon.
Glenryck Pilchards Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 It looks like a rip off of ESPN's Pardon the Interruption, which is no bad thing as that is good viewing usually.
buba3d Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 guys give it a watch its actually bloody brilliant
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted January 3, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 3, 2017 I thought it was alright. The topics were good and Rosenberg did a good job but Heyman and JBL being in character for 75% of it hurt it. JBL was the corporate shill you know he'll be but it was disappointing not to get any genuine opinion out of Heyman.
Abe_Knuckleball_Schwartz Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 Quite enjoyed it, although JBL's comments about 205 was total bollocks.
Paid Members PunkStep Posted January 3, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 3, 2017 Yeah, I really enjoyed that- I'd love to see this become a regular thing. Heymen was a bit over-gimmick at times though, JBL came across well I thought and Rosenberg was a very good host. Would be good to have some different faces on each time.
Paid Members Lorne Malvo Posted January 3, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 3, 2017 I enjoyed the show but having Heyman in character and JBL toeing the company line meant there wasn't much room for any alternative opinion, considering they just shouted the host down every time he tried to make a point anyway. Would be better if the guests were JBL and Bryan or somebody along those lines.
Paid Members PunkStep Posted January 7, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 7, 2017 One of WWE's execs gave an interview this week stating they are working towards making offline viewing available for the Network. Bloody brilliant news, I'd watch the network so much more if I can watch downloaded programmes on my commute. Genuinely surprised that it took Netflix so long to offer it- Sky, BBC and Prime have had it for a while now.
Paid Members Onyx2 Posted January 9, 2017 Paid Members Posted January 9, 2017 One of WWE's execs gave an interview this week stating they are working towards making offline viewing available for the Network. Bloody brilliant news, I'd watch the network so much more if I can watch downloaded programmes on my commute. Genuinely surprised that it took Netflix so long to offer it- Sky, BBC and Prime have had it for a while now. I've seen the same report and it's as vague as can be: "we are definitely looking into considering adding it to the agenda of things to talk about this year." But I totally agree. Offline viewing would quadruple what I watch on the Network.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.