JNLister

Adding to the cinema demands, the BBFC rating screen should also tell you whether there are any in-credits/post-credits scenes.

(photographed/posted by "@designthinking.lol" on BlueSky)

That report completely misses out something which the BBC mentioned but took more than 20 paragraphs to get to: the incest ban won't cover most of the "stepmum" genre. If both characters are presented as adults (and are adults), it only covers blood relations. For "stepparents, stepsiblings and foster parents" it only applies if one of them is portrayed as under 18.

Hands up, that was tipsy posting and very poor judgment. Apologies.

Well, Gemini refused on legal grounds and ChatGPT went for a spectacularly literal interpretation... (Tbf, not that far off)

This is a useless post because, for many many many reasons, I neither have, nor cannot post, a photo, but "woman who looks like the early to mid 20s northern Spanish version of Ellie Killdunne" that I saw in a bar tonight. I appreciate this may, in many senses, be quite a specific post

Had completely forgotten this thread, so hopefully nobody minds a cross-post from the cricket thread;

My favourite Lance Russel thing is that he made a point once a year for a big angle to tell the audience "If you only come to one show this year, make it this one" and it usually sold out. And it worked because he only did it once a year.

Remember the meme with the made up baseball names?

Dopper (who has lost his login) has noted that today is 25 years since the current incarnation of UKFF started. It had been running for a couple of years before that, but 18 September 2001 was when the database was relaunched, people had to reregister their accounts, and the current post counts/database history started that day. No doubt we'll all talk about our wrestling/non-wrestling chat/nonsense in this thread, but don't let's overlook the technical impressiveness of a forum database surviving for a quarter of a century.