Jump to content

The Celebrity Sexual Harassment and Rapists Thread


Devon Malcolm

Recommended Posts

I think it's unfair to run this story without a name attached. It leaves lots of people under suspicion unfairly. I don't really understand how it is in the public interest to publish this story in its current form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, deathrey said:

I think it's unfair to run this story without a name attached. It leaves lots of people under suspicion unfairly. I don't really understand how it is in the public interest to publish this story in its current form. 

I agree but assume they can't until full investigations have taken place, but I'd rather people didn't try and 'guess' who it is on here. I think that's a bit rank and unfair. 

I'd leave that to the dross of Twitter.

Edited by SuperBacon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the investigation should be happening regardless of publication? A push to investigate is the only way I can see a justifiable reason to publish in its current form. 

Edited by deathrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, SuperBacon said:

I agree but assume they can't until full investigations have taken place, but I'd rather people didn't try and 'guess' who it is on here. I think that's a bit rank and unfair. 

I'd leave that to the dross of Twitter.

 

Which reminds me off this pillock. I'm not even much of a fan of Jeremy Vine but I hope his lawyers wreck this gammon.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members

I think the issue is, it is under investigation (both internally and by the police), but the accused has taken out an injunction to prevent the revealing of their identity.

The BBC are damned if they do, damned if they don’t with this story. People are already on with their “defund the BBC” and “they’re all at it” with how the story is currently being run; they’d say the same thing if the person’s identity was mentioned in these stories; and if they just didn’t write about it at all then they’d just be accused of trying to sweep it under the carpet and protect their own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
1 hour ago, Uncle Zeb said:

Hiding in plain sight.

Please not Hacker. Such a stalwart of broadcasting. It'd be too much. Has anybody approached Lauren for a statement?

Edited by jazzygeofferz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mr_Danger said:

spacer.png
*please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot please be Dermot*

Why does he put one hand in the pocket of his jumper? That's really annoyed me.

Edited by SuperBacon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
3 hours ago, Big'Olympic_Hero'Pete said:

All the names I'd suspected are denying it. Had heard suggestions it's Stephan Nolan 

I haven't a clue who it would be, and would hate to suggest a name in a public forum. The suggestion that it's Stephen Nolan though? I find that hilarious. 

Edited by WeeAl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...