Jump to content

The General Politics Thread v2.0 (AKA the "Labour are Cunts" thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted

Have you seen Toploader have been booked to play at the Labour Party conference? Their agent must be incredibly silver tongued. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, jazzygeofferz said:

Have you seen Toploader have been booked to play at the Labour Party conference? Their agent must be incredibly silver tongued. 

Or that Tory and labour preferences are so interchangeable. 

Posted

I like the idea that Starmer personally chooses the entertainment at Conference like he's organising his birthday.  Flicking through his 90s CD collection "Supergrass, can we get them?  What about James, are they still together?"

You're lucky we didn't end up with Hootie and the Blowfish given his age.

 

  • Paid Members
Posted

I'm surprised he didn't see what Professor Brian Cox was up to so he could go full on 1997 Blair with his attitude. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
1 hour ago, SuperBacon said:

Books Toploader, supports Arsenal... God Starmer is SUCH a cunt.

So the last two Labour leaders have been Arsenal supporters. Bet you're praying for Lammy to get the leadership next.

  • Members
Posted
1 minute ago, Carbomb said:

So the last two Labour leaders have been Arsenal supporters. Bet you're praying for Lammy to get the leadership next.

Obviously big JC gets the Punkstep/Factotum/mim pass. 

  • Moderators
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Boycie said:

that could have been something a lot more sinister than glitter. Very poor job by security there.

Could it have been? What do you know about the security of the event to be able to confidently claim that? For example there's less reason for super tight stage security if they are absolutely certain there's no weapons in the room. 

Edited by Chest Rockwell
  • Paid Members
Posted
13 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:

Could it have been? What do you know about the security of the event to be able to confidently claim that? For example there's less reason for super tight stage security if they are absolutely certain there's no weapons in the room. 

Fair point. Just seems somewhat lax that someone could reach the speaker so easily. Even if they were certain there was no weapons, he still could've been assaulted.

  • Paid Members
Posted
58 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:

Could it have been? What do you know about the security of the event to be able to confidently claim that? For example there's less reason for super tight stage security if they are absolutely certain there's no weapons in the room. 

Before the speech the Police did an entire sweep of the venue in preparation. I assume they thought nothing of the glitter

Posted

SEI175435046.jpg?quality=75&width=640&au

What a tosspot that protester looks like.  Hardly channeling the voice of the working class, is he.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...