Paid Members Lion_of_the_Midlands Posted June 14, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 14, 2023 Mad Nads still keen on a bit of blue on blue action. Hates Sunak and really wants to be in the House of Lords. Quote
Tim Healys Chutney Spoon Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 All at the expense of the people who gave her that position in the first place.... Quote
Paid Members Lion_of_the_Midlands Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 Now we see why Johnson threw his toys out of the pram. Would have faced a 90 day suspension which is unprecedented. The committee have gone in on him big time. It's going to be hilarious watching the implosion, which has started already. Quote
Paid Members johnnyboy Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 30 minutes ago, Lion_of_the_Midlands said: Now we see why Johnson threw his toys out of the pram. Would have faced a 90 day suspension which is unprecedented... They'd even voted on expulsion! Quote
Paid Members Your Fight Site Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 Christ, when is Nadine Dorries going to shut the fuck up about this frigging House of Lords nomination? Quote
WyattSheepMask Posted June 15, 2023 Posted June 15, 2023 28 minutes ago, Your Fight Site said: Christ, when is Nadine Dorries going to shut the fuck up about this frigging House of Lords nomination? She’s that person at a party who says she’s going and then spends 2 hours telling everyone she’s going Quote
Tamura Posted June 15, 2023 Posted June 15, 2023 9 minutes ago, WyattSheepMask said: She’s that person at a party who says she’s going and then spends 2 hours telling everyone she’s going Tories are well known for it. Quote
Paid Members Lion_of_the_Midlands Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 53 minutes ago, Your Fight Site said: Christ, when is Nadine Dorries going to shut the fuck up about this frigging House of Lords nomination? That's an easy question to answer. Never. It won't be long before it comes out that she knows Boris's Johnson intimately, then everyone will know how she earned her peerage. At that point you wouldn't begrudge her would you Quote
Tamura Posted June 15, 2023 Posted June 15, 2023 Nadine Dorries may know a lot of things, but in the first sentence she doesn't know that "it's" only ever means "it is". Quote
Members SuperBacon Posted June 15, 2023 Members Posted June 15, 2023 Of all the things to go after her for, grammar errors or typos ain't it. Let's just call her a cunt and be content with that. Quote
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 9 minutes ago, Tamura said: Nadine Dorries may know a lot of things, but in the first sentence she doesn't know that "it's" only ever means "it is". Give her some credit, she’s a scouser, English is her second language Quote
Paid Members Chris B Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 She's also mentioned being dyslexic before. Quote
Tamura Posted June 15, 2023 Posted June 15, 2023 4 hours ago, SuperBacon said: Of all the things to go after her for, grammar errors or typos ain't it. I'm not going after her. I'm commeting on the very troubling fact that people running the country aren't even capable of communicating using an acceptable standard of English. Quote
Members SuperBacon Posted June 15, 2023 Members Posted June 15, 2023 14 minutes ago, Tamura said: I'm not going after her. I'm commeting on the very troubling fact that people running the country aren't even capable of communicating using an acceptable standard of English. HOLD THAT L!!!! Quote
Paid Members BomberPat Posted June 15, 2023 Paid Members Posted June 15, 2023 1 hour ago, Tamura said: I'm not going after her. I'm commeting on the very troubling fact that people running the country aren't even capable of communicating using an acceptable standard of English. Bollocks to that. She's a corrupt sycophant, given a position of authority over things she demonstrably knows nothing about. The placement of an apostrophe in a Tweet is fuck all compared to anything else worth criticising her about, and so long as meaning and intent is conveyed, whether everything is spelled correctly or grammatically correct is irrelevant at best and exclusionary at worst - would you exclude good progressive politicians on the grounds that their grammar was a bit off? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.