Paid Members Egg Shen Posted November 13, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 13, 2015 yep, he's now. Eamonn Holmes came straight out of the gate with a question about the racism thing.
WyattSheepMask Posted November 13, 2015 Posted November 13, 2015 Yeah, and he somehow kept a straight face throughout the whole thing even busting out "WWE know I'm not racist". He says all the right things but you know he doesn't mean any of it, He's in full on work mode the whole time
Paid Members Bellenda Carlisle Posted November 13, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 13, 2015 Good to see Taker has started to use the barber Sting recommended to him They should have a hair vs hair match at mania.
The Clint Posted November 13, 2015 Posted November 13, 2015 I wonder if he said to Holmes before the interview "Let me work it, Brother"
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted November 13, 2015 Author Paid Members Posted November 13, 2015 Good to see Taker has started to use the barber Sting recommended to him They should have a hair vs hair match at mania. "Stinger's hair is gone, King, just like Dubya-See-Dubya"
Slapnuts Posted November 13, 2015 Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) Recently watched Mania XX and I completely forgot that Undertaker Vs Kane was given the "dead slot" just before the main event (yep, that main event that never happened) and was only given just over 6 minutes!! Seems ludicrous. Are the any reasons/theories why Taker Vs Kane was booked so weak? Edited November 13, 2015 by Slapnuts
Paid Members Your Fight Site Posted November 13, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 13, 2015 Recently watched Mania XX and I completely forgot that Undertaker Vs Kane was given the "dead slot" just before the main event (yep, that main event that never happened) and was only given just over 6 minutes!! Seems ludicrous. Are the any reasons/theories why Taker Vs Kane was booked so weak? Not sure, but it was really crap compared to their epic encounter at WrestleMania XIV. I don’t know about any one else, but that’s one of my favourite WrestleMania matches ever.
Paid Members air_raid Posted November 13, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 13, 2015 Recently watched Mania XX and I completely forgot that Undertaker Vs Kane was given the "dead slot" just before the main event (yep, that main event that never happened) and was only given just over 6 minutes!! Seems ludicrous. Are the any reasons/theories why Taker Vs Kane was booked so weak? Probably because they knew the story/impact would be Taker coming back, reverting to the "Dead Man" character, his entrance etc, and at that stage a match between the two wouldn't be up to much. Which makes their 2010 run for the Big Gold Belt even more mystifying.
Fanny Pack Posted November 13, 2015 Posted November 13, 2015 That finish in the WWE title match at Vengeance 03 is awful. A 3 way with Lesnar (the champ), Angle and Big Show. Angle pins Lesnar to win the belt. Big Show wasnt even on the next PPV, he had already been beaten by Brock at the previous PPV. The match set up a Angle v Lesnar match at SummerSlam were Angle again beat Lesnar? I dont understand why they had Brock lose 2 PPVs in a row as a babyface. I appreciate he turned not long after but back to my original point, why the hell didnt Big Show take the pin at Vengeance? I have no issue with putting the belt on Angle but beating Lesnar twice was soft.
DraxSpago Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Because the point was that Lesnar couldn't handle losing to anyone, especially ex arch enemy Angle, if Angle had pinned Big Show Lesnar wouldn't have any reason to feel inferior, turn heel, join up with Vince etc.
Paid Members air_raid Posted November 14, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 14, 2015 Angle pins Lesnar to win the belt. Big Show wasnt even on the next PPV, he had already been beaten by Brock at the previous PPV. The match set up a Angle v Lesnar match at SummerSlam were Angle again beat Lesnar? I dont understand why they had Brock lose 2 PPVs in a row as a babyface. Lesnar had turned heel by SummerSlam.
Fanny Pack Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 (edited) Well seeing as my argument was based on Lesnar not turning til after SSlam ive defo seen my arse here. Cheers for the education lads. I will do a bit more research next time. Loving 2002 SD! aswell. Beautiful People intro rules. Edited November 14, 2015 by Fanny Pack
The Clint Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Beautiful People was also used for the first few of episodes of Raw Is War but edited to We're All Together Now on the Network. They need to get cracking and start uploading Raw and SD from 2000.
Paid Members GlennCullen Posted November 14, 2015 Paid Members Posted November 14, 2015 The lack of complete Raw, SD and Nitro is a big annoyance when it comes to the network.
The Dart Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Beautiful People was also used for the first few of episodes of Raw Is War but edited to We're All Together Now on the Network. They need to get cracking and start uploading Raw and SD from 2000. They've recently added a few more Smackdowns from 2000, which is a good start. I'm more keen to see those than Raw, as they were never on TV here.
Recommended Posts