TobyK Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 I think when the women in AEW really feel the need to produce a banger, they can, even Toni Storm. But 75%ish of the time it feels timid and the performers are unsure & slow/rigid to react. I'm pretty much fast-forwarding a fair amount of the division....until Hayter comes back and joins BCC. I also skip through FTR and Rodrick Strong matches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69MeDon Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 13 hours ago, RedRooster said: Every time I see Willow I feel a bit disappointed. Not because of anything she does, but itâs because of the potential she has - and the fact sheâll likely never meet it in AEW given how they treat female wrestlers. Sheâs NXT-era Bayley, infectiously likeable and incredibly marketable; hindered by the fact that thereâs a boss around who seemingly doesnât âget itâ. At this point thereâs really no excuse for AEW not to have a womenâs division to rival what WWE and Impact has to offer - with title matches in the conversation to main event PPVs. Aside from Willow; you have Athena, utterly wasted in ROH; the massively underrated Shida, Riho, Emi Sakura and Nyla Rose; Thunder Rosa; Jade Cargill; Kris Statlander; up-and-comers in Anna Jay and Skye Blue; and, regardless of what you think about her, Britt Baker. Thatâs a bloody good division. Tony Khan deserves more criticism than he gets for how he treats it. Honestly, I just don't think Tony Khan values or enjoys women's wrestling. I can't think of any other reason they treat the women's division as they do. And, by extension, that means I don't value of enjoy the women's wrestling I see in AEW, meaning I pretty much skip every women's match these days. If I know the guy writing the shows doesn't care about it, why would I? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 (edited) Storm and Taya setting up a nothing title match by bickering like children, pretty much sums up the women's division. Been saying since almost day one that TS doesn't give a shit about women's wrestling. Probably hard to motivate yourself when you know your efforts will amount to little if anything. I don't blame anyone for phoning it in. The likes of Maki Itoh (or maybe TJPW have finally smartened up after Mizuki got the jobber treatment) seems to have caught on and spends more time on the US indies lately. Edit. And on that note. Maki Itoh and Nick Gage is a team that I didn't know I needed in my life until now. Edited July 16, 2023 by The King Of Swing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Land Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 1 hour ago, 69MeDon said: Honestly, I just don't think Tony Khan values or enjoys women's wrestling. I can't think of any other reason they treat the women's division as they do. And, by extension, that means I don't value of enjoy the women's wrestling I see in AEW, meaning I pretty much skip every women's match these days. If I know the guy writing the shows doesn't care about it, why would I? As a wrestling fan, i'm sure he enjoys it. As an owner he clearly doesn't value it. You can probably count on your hands the number of times Dynamite or Rampage has had two women's matches on a show. The Women's Tag Tournament they did during lockdown and the Japanese side of an Eliminator tournament were ideas pushed for by from others. Both hidden away on Youtube. The Owen tournaments have been a bit of an afterthought. Jade Cargill and Saraya have been a couple of people he really got behind, but I've always seen that more as a marketing exercise than to do with wrestling. Britt Baker being the original poster child that mixes both marketing and wrestling. Toni Storm might have been the only signing that ticked the analytical box for wrestling. She's only been in the company in the company for a little over a year and has probably had more TV matches than any other woman in the company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TildeGuy~! Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 (edited) I think they were expecting more Joshi wrestlers to move over full time but  obviously that hasnât worked out, I think Yuka Sakazaki will be returning at some point after she recovers from injury as she has confirmed sheâll be leaving TJPW. Utami Hayashishita was wrestling for GCW last week and I was expecting her to turn up in AEW for a couple of matches before she went back to Stardom for their version of the G1 but that didnât happen. Guilia won the NJPW Strong title recently so sheâll be taking more dates in America so hopefully sheâll pop up at some point too. Edited July 16, 2023 by TildeGuy~! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted July 16, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted July 16, 2023 Tony is a stats guy. He looks at breakdowns per segment and their ratings. If the ratings didnât drop during womanâs matches they would be featured more. Iâm not saying heâs right or that the focus is in anyway sufficient, Iâm just pointing out why itâs likely treated that way. He clearly cares about the woman he signs, but the division will always be an afterthought whilst presented in its current state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRooster Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 1 hour ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Tony is a stats guy. He looks at breakdowns per segment and their ratings. If the ratings didnât drop during womanâs matches they would be featured more. Iâm not saying heâs right or that the focus is in anyway sufficient, Iâm just pointing out why itâs likely treated that way. I have no idea what ratings are for womenâs matches in AEW, but if they do indeed drop, to look at a rating and conclude itâs female wrestlers that are the problem and not AEWâs presentation of them or arrogant bordering on sexist. That theory - if it is indeed what he believes - can easily be torn apart; you can easily point to WWEâs highly successful and marketable womenâs division, or Impactâs womenâs division - which was a ratings winner even before WWE started to make an effort. For clarity, Hannibal, I know thatâs not what youâre suggesting - but if Khan really did believe that, I would hope that someone internal would call him out. Whatever the case, itâs such a shame because the potential of that division is so obvious. It started in a rough place, but the components are there to have womenâs feuds and matches that rival what WWE and Impact puts on. Given that AEW presented itself as a company of equal opportunity on launch, it needs to do better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 I havenât seen anyone go crazy for a wwe womanâs feud in years, we still talking about the nxt purple patch here of wwe being leaders in womenâs wrestling? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted July 16, 2023 Share Posted July 16, 2023 1 hour ago, TildeGuy~! said: Guilia won the NJPW Strong title recently so sheâll be taking more dates in America so hopefully sheâll pop up at some point too. Wouldn't count on it. Giulia is probably just keeping that belt warm for when Mercedes, recovers. Hell I don't think Mayu Iwatani has even defended the IWGP Women's Title since winning it. TS can at least take some comfort in AEW's women's division not being as big of a shit show as New Japan's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted July 17, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted July 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Louch said: I havenât seen anyone go crazy for a wwe womanâs feud in years, we still talking about the nxt purple patch here of wwe being leaders in womenâs wrestling? Everyone, rightly, gave plaudits for WWE having their womenâs only PPV. That was in 2018 and even though WWE have âPremium Live Eventsâ now instead, have never done another. The first womanâs Wrestlemania main event was off the back of that, and because Rhonda Rousey was a crossover star still at that time.  Every wrestling company has at one time done a decent go at pushing womanâs wrestling, whether that is headlong PPVâs or Weekly TV shows, more tv time, larger rosters etc. But there has to be a reason as to why itâs still seen as a second or 3rd tier of relevance in 2023. But wrestling isnât the only sport with un-equal positions when it comes to sexism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew "the ref" coyne Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 (edited) Credit to Kahn, at least he's pushing the women more visibly on the ROH show. Athena is having a great run as ROH Women's Champion. Sadly as much as we may want, and it be righteous, for women to get even representation on these shows, the sad reality is that the larger fanbase do not get behind it as much as the male wrestlers. I also believe the more divisions you have the harder it's got to be to juggle all your long term programs. So even if you wanted to split it evenly 50/50, the reality is that it will impact the build for the other fueds. It's a horrible no win situation. Edited July 17, 2023 by andrew "the ref" coyne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRooster Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 9 hours ago, Louch said: I havenât seen anyone go crazy for a wwe womanâs feud in years, we still talking about the nxt purple patch here of wwe being leaders in womenâs wrestling? Perhaps not, but outside of The Bloodline the same could be said for male wrestling feuds. And weâve certainly seen people go crazy for female wrestlers. Rhea Ripley is one of the hottest acts in wrestling, Bianca Belairâs star has risen significantly in recent years; and whatever you think of them, Becky Lynch, Charlotte and Bayley are among the biggest stars in the company. 3 hours ago, andrew "the ref" coyne said: Sadly as much as we may want, and it be righteous, for women to get even representation on these shows, the sad reality is that the larger fanbase do not get behind it as much as the male wrestlers. Based on what metric? I donât avidly digest ratings, but WWE and TNA/Impact both disprove any perception that womenâs matches/segments lose viewers. When it comes to crowd reaction, thereâs no argument to be made either. Theyâre on a par with menâs matches in both WWE and Impact. If the performers are presented well, the audience will react. If theyâre lower card acts, the reaction may be more muted. 3 hours ago, andrew "the ref" coyne said: I also believe the more divisions you have the harder it's got to be to juggle all your long term programs. So even if you wanted to split it evenly 50/50, the reality is that it will impact the build for the other fueds. It's a horrible no win situation. Iâm sure, in their 5-hours of weekly programming, AEW could just about manage to give their female wrestlers a more prominent role. At one point, you could legitimately argue that AEWâs womenâs division lacked the depth to be featured prominently, but that just isnât the case anymore - itâs packed with talent. While I absolutely believe that representation matters, itâs not just about that. They have a womenâs roster packed with wrestlers that are interesting and fun to watch, and deserve better than theyâre getting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vamp Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 I think the writing was on the wall after they didn't follow up on the Thunder Rosa/Britt Baker lights out match. There was a real buzz around that point. AEW couldn't give two shits about their women's division. There's no reason they couldn't be a draw for the company but they've decided not to push them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 7 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Everyone, rightly, gave plaudits for WWE having their womenâs only PPV. That was in 2018 and even though WWE have âPremium Live Eventsâ now instead, have never done another. The first womanâs Wrestlemania main event was off the back of that, and because Rhonda Rousey was a crossover star still at that time.  Every wrestling company has at one time done a decent go at pushing womanâs wrestling, whether that is headlong PPVâs or Weekly TV shows, more tv time, larger rosters etc. But there has to be a reason as to why itâs still seen as a second or 3rd tier of relevance in 2023. But wrestling isnât the only sport with un-equal positions when it comes to sexism. Why does it have to be sexism? Itâs not unfair to say there are many more better menâs wrestlers than female, forcing equality in terms of time given doesnât make their matches more watchable. If they where all having banging matches and giving killer promos they would be all over the show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WyattSheepMask Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 7 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Everyone, rightly, gave plaudits for WWE having their womenâs only PPV. That was in 2018 and even though WWE have âPremium Live Eventsâ now instead, have never done another. The first womanâs Wrestlemania main event was off the back of that, and because Rhonda Rousey was a crossover star still at that time.   They gave plaudits yes but itâs important to remember as well that it was held in part as a make-good for them not being allowed on the Saudi show that occurred later in the week. Since then the women have been âallowedâ on the Saudi shows more and more in the years since, but thatâs  a bigger conversation to be had. I seem to recall it also had strong opening day ticket sales but then struggled to shift many more afterwards, leading to the event playing out to a mostly dark arena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.