Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
10 minutes ago, mim731 said:

Yeah I'm glad we signed him, good option to have and he offers something different going forward when we need to try and unpick a defence, which Arsenal have been lacking in some games. 

Also he seems like a good lad who really wanted this move, so I'm happy for him in that regard too. 

And he's flexible, too, he can play central or wide and I think Arsenal have needed more flexibility in a couple of their players.

  • Paid Members
Posted
2 hours ago, Devon Malcolm said:

Quite why Chelsea want Garnacho is a total mystery to me, the guy hasn't got it.

They're taking Buonanotte on loan from Brighton for the season. That feels even weirder. Bloke was at Leicester last year and heading for Leeds on loan before this. Baffling stuff. At least buy him for £25m and send him on loan 8 times. That'd be normal behaviour.

Posted
16 minutes ago, tiger_rick said:

They're taking Buonanotte on loan from Brighton for the season. That feels even weirder. Bloke was at Leicester last year and heading for Leeds on loan before this. Baffling stuff. At least buy him for £25m and send him on loan 8 times. That'd be normal behaviour.

My guess is they want bodies while selling some deadwood as they have to stay in the green transfers wise. Otherwise makes no sense. 

 

  • Paid Members
Posted
34 minutes ago, sivy said:

My guess is they want bodies while selling some deadwood as they have to stay in the green transfers wise. Otherwise makes no sense. 

Odd from Brighton's perspective too. Apparently wanted him to stay in England to get PL experience and then send him out to be 88th choice forward at Chelsea.

Posted
16 hours ago, tiger_rick said:

Odd from Brighton's perspective too. Apparently wanted him to stay in England to get PL experience and then send him out to be 88th choice forward at Chelsea.

Their an odd team, I always thought the lad they sold to Sunderland was decent. Ecriso was going to Strasbourg then Chelsea if he didn't fail a medical. You start to think are they linked some how lol. 

  • Members
Posted
22 minutes ago, air_raid said:

Spurs gotta Spurs. Fucking inevitable.

As bad as Spurs were (and they were BAD), Bournemouth were absolutely excellent. Iraola got it right, Frank got it wrong. It happens.

  • Paid Members
Posted
27 minutes ago, air_raid said:

Spurs gotta Spurs. Fucking inevitable.

My FPL team is in shambles after that. Debating using one of my Wildcards to get rid of the lot of them.

Posted
3 hours ago, Lion_of_the_Midlands said:

I haven't listened to the rest of the game but why are we playing extra time in a league match. 

Screenshot_20250830_170901_BBC Sport.jpg

Guessing there must have been some long delays as that seems an awfully long game!

  • Members
Posted (edited)

108 minutes must be one of the latest goals in normal time.

I bet there's some game that went on for hours for "reasons"

Edited by SuperBacon
108 not 118
Posted
3 hours ago, Lion_of_the_Midlands said:

I haven't listened to the rest of the game but why are we playing extra time in a league match. 

Screenshot_20250830_170901_BBC Sport.jpg

Derby vs Ipswich went 17 minutes. Clearly someone is doing Larry Zybszko somewhere in these games. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...