Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I can't help but think that if you said "I take full responsibility for missing our target by 80,000 people" in most places that would be followed up with "and I resign." 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Your Fight Site said:

When was it he announced he was taking “direct control” of the COVID situation? May or something?

June. Although it’s easy to get confused because he does take control of a few things because he’s doing his best. 

 

  • Paid Members
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Lion_of_the_Midlands said:

There are enough former posters on here who are already on government watch lists ?

More of them on a register than a watch list I suspect. 

Edited by mim731
Clarification
  • Paid Members
Posted (edited)

Christ, this is depressing reading.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/feb/02/labour-urged-to-focus-on-flag-and-patriotism-to-win-voters-trust-leak-reveals?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Labour’s plan for how to get back in to power is to try and out Tory the Tories. A pandemic where we’ve arguably fared as one of the worst managed countries throughout and this guy is still trailing in the polls. Where are the “any other leader would be 20 points ahead” brigade now? Actually, they are still about, making the bizarre argument that everything is pointing in the right direction for Labour. 
 

They’re getting nowhere under Sir Keir “let’s have a green revolution while I run over cyclists in my Range Rover in Central London”  Starmer. An utterly, bland, vacuous bureaucrat who joins Tories in the list of certified CUNTS.

Edited by stumobir
  • Paid Members
Posted

His entire political stance is 'not Corbyn' because he stands for absolutely nothing else. The Tories have manslaughtered (at best) tens of thousands of people and Labour haven't gone anywhere.

Then there's this:-

 

  • Paid Members
Posted

He thinks he can Tony Blair the next election. But even Blair wasn't stupid enough to essentially try and cut off the socialist arm of the party. Plus he has neither the charisma or clear-mindedness on any policy. He's utterly and completely fucking useless.

  • Paid Members
Posted

Yeah, he thinks he can coast into government on the back of a "we're not the Tories" platform, much like Biden's successful "I'm not Trump" presidential campaign. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
2 hours ago, stumobir said:

Christ, this is depressing reading.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/feb/02/labour-urged-to-focus-on-flag-and-patriotism-to-win-voters-trust-leak-reveals?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Labour’s plan for how to get back in to power is to try and out Tory the Tories. A pandemic where we’ve arguably fared as one of the worst managed countries throughout and this guy is still trailing in the polls. Where are the “any other leader would be 20 points ahead” brigade now? Actually, they are still about, making the bizarre argument that everything is pointing in the right direction for Labour. 
 

They’re getting nowhere under Sir Keir “let’s have a green revolution while I run over cyclists in my Range Rover in Central London”  Starmer. An utterly, bland, vacuous bureaucrat who joins Tories in the list of certified CUNTS.

It’s looking good for Corbyn. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Devon Malcolm said:

He thinks he can Tony Blair the next election. But even Blair wasn't stupid enough to essentially try and cut off the socialist arm of the party. Plus he has neither the charisma or clear-mindedness on any policy. He's utterly and completely fucking useless.

You’ve seen this, I assume. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...