Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
14 hours ago, TAFKA Jonny Vegas said:

 

SPL is where the REAL football is.

English football has became everything Roy Keane warned us about 20 odd years ago.

I've been seeing a lot of this 'Scottish football is more entertaining than English football' stuff doing the rounds.

It's just bollocks. One entertaining season doesn't make up for 40+ years of two teams having a monopoly on the league, and doesn't excuse the fact that a lot of the football is still dogshit. 

For what it's worth, I find English football to be really boring now too.

  • Paid Members
Posted

After my previous rant about FIFA, today we have the news that 10 players from Jamaican club Mount Pleasant have been denied US Visas to play LA Galaxy in the Concacaf Champions Cup. Given that political interference in football associations is barred by FIFA, shouldn't they be throwing these twats out of Concacaf until they sort it out, regardless of whether Don is their mate or not?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cddnlp5g8rro

Posted

It depends what you mean by "dogshit".

There have been loads of players who came up to the SPL from England thinking it would be a skoosh and went back down the road with their tail between their legs.

"40+ years of two teams having monopoly on the league" - it's the same or very similar almost everywhere.

Germany, Spain, England, France, Italy, Portugal, Turkey.

This isn't "one" entertaining season, it's just one that's been more competitive than others in recent memory.

I'd much rather the passion and drama of the SPL than anything the Premier League has to offer.

  • Members
Posted
21 minutes ago, TAFKA Jonny Vegas said:

There have been loads of players who came up to the SPL from England thinking it would be a skoosh and went back down the road with their tail between their legs.

I'm not having a pop, and you're actually right, but at what stage of their career were they when they did?

Anyway, all football is shit, this season is shit, cancel it etc.

Glad Mikey Moore is doing well though obvs.

  • Paid Members
Posted

When it comes to England, "40+ years of domination by two teams" is not remotely true. I'm not saying I disagree that it's become boring, but one criterion by which not to judge that is the spread of teams that have won the PL, or the English league in general.

Over the past forty years, there have been nine different teams as champion, and the challengers have varied from year to year. In Europe, England has the widest spread of silverware winners - six different teams. Nowhere else in Europe comes close.

  • Members
Posted
13 minutes ago, tiger_rick said:

It's not true of the SPL either. It was a one team league for 5 years!

And not that long back, it was a one team league for 9 years!

  • Paid Members
Posted

Only mentioned the English league because I know it well enough.

I did have a suspicion the Spanish league might be less competitive - it's only had eight winners, but the winners outside Real and Barcelona have won quite a few times.

The Italian league, I was able to name at least five winners in my lifetime just off the top of my head, but a swatch on Wiki says they've got a pretty good spread.

Tried getting more detail on Germany, but it's difficult because of the wars and the national split - but I could name at least four champions during my lifetime.

France, I didn't realise until I checked now that PSG are not as successful as all that - I remembered Marseille and Monaco doing well in the 90s, but didn't realise PSG didn't really dominate until the 2010s.

  • Members
Posted
2 minutes ago, Carbomb said:

Tried getting more detail on Germany,

I mean in the last 3 years you've had a team win it for the first time ever. Even though Bayern dominate most years, its always very competitive. 

  • Paid Members
Posted
3 minutes ago, Carbomb said:

France, I didn't realise until I checked now that PSG are not as successful as all that - I remembered Marseille and Monaco doing well in the 90s, but didn't realise PSG didn't really dominate until the 2010s.

Before the oil money, Lyon were dominant in France. 

Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, gmoney said:

It's not true of any of the leagues he's listed.

All of the leagues I've listed particularly Germany, Spain, France, Portugal are near exclusively dominated by 2 to 3 teams every season.

Maybe not for 40 years but that's what the word similar alludes to.

My point is that the "scottish football is shit" chat is utterly tiresome and the "oh the same team(s) always win it" is a common situation in numerous leagues not just across europe but most of the world.

Edited by TAFKA Jonny Vegas
  • Paid Members
Posted

A big part of the reason why people are so invested in seeing Hearts win the league is precisely because of the boring Old Firm domination that's been in place since just after Ferguson was at Aberdeen.

Using Italy as an example of a predictable boring league is ridiculous, it's the most open of the biggest leagues in Europe and it's no coincidence that it's probably the best to watch out of them 

  • Paid Members
Posted

Joey Barton getting a £300k bill for libel against Eni Aluko and being charged with wounding on the same day is completely unexpected behaviour.

  • Paid Members
Posted
2 minutes ago, TAFKA Jonny Vegas said:

All of the leagues I've listed particularly Germany, Spain, France, Portugal are near exclusively dominated by 2 to 3 teams every season.

Every league you've listed has had at least four different winners in the last 25 years. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...