Philjax Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 To be fair, now i think about it there's probs loads of people who don't mix the two but to be a complete teetotal but also go out and ONLY do drugs seems weird. Anyway looking at Eva's incredible physique it's probably some fat burner that's outlawed because of a rogue ingredient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted August 18, 2016 Moderators Share Posted August 18, 2016 Or she's on steds. It's not unknown for fitness models to use them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 I think (might have been a Total Divas storyline) Eva was an alcoholic or drug addict when she was younger, and doesn't do any of it now? If that's true, it would've been something performance or physique enhancing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DraxSpago Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Is there nothing in the wellness policy that let's you off if you're fit as fuck? If not there should be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Stain Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 They should let Del Rio loose on the WWE Universe when he is geared up. Either that or give him a shit load of mandy. Maybe then be wouldn't be such a boring bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted August 19, 2016 Moderators Share Posted August 19, 2016 This is going to be a fun one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Eddie Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 This is going to be a fun one. Isn't kicking off publicly about a wellness violation the quickest way to get fired? That would be a huge waste, she's Gold on Smackdown at the minute. The distinguished voice-over for her entrance is genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCJ Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 (edited) Meanwhile, Brock Lesnar who seems exempt from WWE drug testing is set to make even more money for himself by being booked in a match at Summerslam this Sunday #doublestandards Edited August 19, 2016 by LCJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hallicks Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Is there nothing in the wellness policy that let's you off if you're fit as fuck? If not there should be But then they'd need to find another loophole for Eva Marie, so what's the point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Gordon_The_Gopher Posted August 19, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted August 19, 2016 Meanwhile, Brock Lesnar who seems exempt from WWE drug testing is set to make even more money for himself by being booked in a match at Summerslam this Sunday #doublestandards Part-timers are exempt from wellness policy. WWE released a statement to that effect shortly after his UFC busting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slapnut Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 (edited) With the Lesnar non-suspension, isn't it just the fact that he hasn't failed a WWE-run drug test and that whatever he failed for isn't banned under their wellness policy? Edited August 19, 2016 by Slapnut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members ColinBollocks Posted August 19, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted August 19, 2016 (edited) Nah, they pretty much said part timers are exempt from testing. Basically it means Triple H, The Rock, Lesnar, Taker (you know, the big stars) can take what they want when they want, they're too big for that shit. Wouldn't surprise me now if Cena has managed to get some exemption too, as he's bloody John Cena. The Wellness thing was and will remain a PR move. Vince even said as much a few years back. Edited August 19, 2016 by ColinBollocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d-d-d-dAz Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 (edited) Their argument was basically 'we're not a real sport, we don't test to ensure fairness in competition, we test to ensure our employees are healthy in later life (see: we don't want them to kill their families) and part-timers aren't our employees. We couldn't give a fuck what they do in their spare time.' I sort of saw the wisdom in that. Edited August 19, 2016 by d-d-d-dAz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loligan Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Fair enough that really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grecian Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Their argument was basically 'we're not a real sport, we don't test to ensure fairness in competition, we test to ensure our Independent Contractors who we refuse to acknowledge are employees to save money are healthy in later life (see: we don't want them to kill their families) and part-timers aren't our employees. We couldn't give a fuck what they do in their spare time.' I sort of saw the wisdom in that. Edited for correctness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.