Moderators PowerButchi Posted October 14, 2014 Moderators Share Posted October 14, 2014 Yeah, but I can suspend whoever I want anyway. And you're not worthy of my super commentary skills. I may upload an MP3 of commentary for a match to watch with youtube so you can see how it's done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 At least Bryan getting the surgery for sure now should have him back for WrestleMania. Dunno what there is to do with him there, maybe a match with Rollins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew "the ref" coyne Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 At least Bryan getting the surgery for sure now should have him back for WrestleMania. Dunno what there is to do with him there, maybe a match with Rollins? Â Really? I read that the recovery time is 6 - 12 months? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 Oh, my mistake then, sorry about that. I haven't read the latest reports. In the interviews Bryan did around SummerSlam time, he said the surgery they were thinking of had a three month recovery time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dart Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 (edited) The latest 'reports' say he'll be back by Mania, but not Rumble. Â Him being surprise 40 in the Rumble would be great in a callback to this year, but probably pointless if he didn't win it. Edited October 14, 2014 by The Dart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP RULZ Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 The latest 'reports' say he'll be back by Mania, but not Rumble.  Him being surprise 40 in the Rumble would be great in a callback to this year, but probably pointless if he didn't win it.  The surprise 30 or 40th man as it would be in 2015 has been done to death now though, I'd give it a good few years before they go down route again for anybody.  It doesn't sound too good for Bryan really, I wouldn't be holding out hopes he returns in time for Mania either, if he does then great, but at the minute I'm not expecting him to be on the card TBH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanny Pack Posted October 15, 2014 Share Posted October 15, 2014 Â Â The latest 'reports' say he'll be back by Mania, but not Rumble. Â Him being surprise 40 in the Rumble would be great in a callback to this year, but probably pointless if he didn't win it. The surprise 30 or 40th man as it would be in 2015 has been done to death now though, I'd give it a good few years before they go down route again for anybody. Â It doesn't sound too good for Bryan really, I wouldn't be holding out hopes he returns in time for Mania either, if he does then great, but at the minute I'm not expecting him to be on the card TBH. The suprise final entrant hasnt been done since Cena in 2008 (Edge was 29 in 2010). Â The last entrant in the past few years has been shite. Â 2014- Rey 2013- Ryback 2012- Big Show 2011- Kane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dash X Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 (edited) The latest 'reports' say he'll be back by Mania, but not Rumble. Â Him being surprise 40 in the Rumble would be great in a callback to this year, but probably pointless if he didn't win it. I'd have bryan enter as surprise number 1. Twitter would explode. Have him break the record for longest rumble showing and win it all. Or have the authority screw him as the last man eliminated for extreme heat. Edited October 17, 2014 by Dash X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WyattSheepMask Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 So you'd put the lad whose just come back from two surgeries (one of which necessitated by a lack of regaining arm strength) into a match that (assuming the 2015 rumble is 40 entrants) will go for over an hour on his first night back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members air_raid Posted October 17, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted October 17, 2014 Him being surprise 40 in the Rumble (assuming the 2015 rumble is 40 entrants) Â Is this just being discussed for shits and giggles, or has something broke that I've missed about it actually possibly being 40 again? Â I really hope not. The Royal Rumble is 30 men. 30 is enough. If you're not important enough to be in the 30, you don't deserve to be in the Royal Rumble (excluding people in serious undercard matches). They wouldn't have had 40 in the 2011 Rumble, I don't think, if they hadn't have had about 10 essentially marginal guys running around as Punk and Barratt's foot soldiers in the least interesting stable rivalry for a decade. I might be in the minority, from what I remember, but the 2011 Rumble dragged for me from the moment Punk got eliminated to the moment Santino popped back into the ring, save the appearances of Booker T and Big Sexy Kev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil is brill Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 The 40 man Rumble hasn't officially been announced on TV or WWE website, but it was announced to the crowd only at a Smackdown taping a few weeks back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undefeated Steak Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 If the #1 entrant wins then it would give them a huge bragging point going into Wrestlemania, "I beat 39 other superstars...". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sphinx Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 29 other superstars is big as well though. It's 10 more people, but I don't think anyone's going to think much more of them because of the extra ten than if they beat 29. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undefeated Steak Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 29 other superstars is big as well though. It's 10 more people, but I don't think anyone's going to think much more of them because of the extra ten than if they beat 29. Â Yes, but nobody's ever beaten 39 before have they? A much better claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinc Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Â 29 other superstars is big as well though. It's 10 more people, but I don't think anyone's going to think much more of them because of the extra ten than if they beat 29. Â Yes, but nobody's ever beaten 39 before have they? A much better claim. Â Del Rio has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts