UKFF Porn and General Filth Discussion

[Kookoocachu]

Have any petitions about this surfaced yet?

[Surf Digby]

Something I read in a comments section earlier...

 

I'm guessing they are following Australia's logic, which bans female ejaculation as a form of urolagnia, even though it's pretty well proven that it's not, in fact, urine[/size]

I've no idea if it ever was made official, but someone tried to get it classed as the same in the UK, on the basis that someone had analysed it and found it to contact traces of urine.

 

I'm getting the feeling that this panel consisted of people that don't watch nor understand porn.

[Kookoocachu]

I like that Wiki refers to it as a phenomenon.

[King Pitcos]

I saw someone on Facebook saying that the list of things is from the 1964 obscene publications act, rather than being compiled recently.

[Surf Digby]

Wouldn't that still list gay porn as being obscene? If someone's actually using that as the basis for this bit of legislation, they're opening themselves up for a paddling stern talking to.

[King Pitcos]

I would have thought it would have defined all porn as obscene, so I assumed it was someone talking wet. Was the stuff on the naughty list even going on in porn in the fifties and sixties?

Edited December 3, 2014 by King Pitcos

[PowerButchi]

Hardcore wasn't even legal here until 2000 or so.

Edited December 3, 2014 by PowerButchi

[Sergio Mendacious]

They'll be rebanning The Werewolf and the Yeti next

[nfc90210]

Edit: Nevermind

Edited February 21, 2021 by nfc90210

[JNLister]

To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway.

 

Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man.

[bAzTNM#1]

Six months on bail – for being sent spoof video of a ‘tiger’ having sex, that was really a man in a tiger suit

The Crown Prosecution Service said it only recognised that it was a man when the tiger was heard on the soundtrack saying “that’s grrrrrrreat”, like Tony the Tiger from Frosties’ breakfast cereal adverts.

 

Just want to throw that out there as I think it's hilarious. Six months on bail?!?!? This fucking country.

Edited December 6, 2014 by bAzTNM#1

[Thunderplex]

 

To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway.

 

 

Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man.

Where does racial discrimination and abortion come into the realm of entertainment? Bit of a piss poor argument there Lister, letting yourself down a bit son.

[handspants]

 

 urethral sounding

 

I just looked up what that is; and, well... each to their own.

[JNLister]

 

 

To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway.

 

Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man.

Where does racial discrimination and abortion come into the realm of entertainment? Bit of a piss poor argument there Lister, letting yourself down a bit son.

 

 

Nope, both you and (devil's advocate me) are fine with unfair laws as long as they don't directly affect ourselves.

[Thunderplex]

Where did I state I was fine with the law? I just said that I dont watch porn that involves the scenes mentioned. Two out of two there Lister. Have you not had your weetabix today?