Paid Members Kookoocachu Posted December 2, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 2, 2014 Have any petitions about this surfaced yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted December 2, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 2, 2014 Something I read in a comments section earlier... I'm guessing they are following Australia's logic, which bans female ejaculation as a form of urolagnia, even though it's pretty well proven that it's not, in fact, urine[/size] I've no idea if it ever was made official, but someone tried to get it classed as the same in the UK, on the basis that someone had analysed it and found it to contact traces of urine. I'm getting the feeling that this panel consisted of people that don't watch nor understand porn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Kookoocachu Posted December 2, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 2, 2014 I like that Wiki refers to it as a phenomenon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 I saw someone on Facebook saying that the list of things is from the 1964 obscene publications act, rather than being compiled recently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted December 3, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 3, 2014 Wouldn't that still list gay porn as being obscene? If someone's actually using that as the basis for this bit of legislation, they're opening themselves up for a paddling stern talking to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) I would have thought it would have defined all porn as obscene, so I assumed it was someone talking wet. Was the stuff on the naughty list even going on in porn in the fifties and sixties? Edited December 3, 2014 by King Pitcos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted December 3, 2014 Moderators Share Posted December 3, 2014 (edited) Hardcore wasn't even legal here until 2000 or so. Edited December 3, 2014 by PowerButchi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Sergio Mendacious Posted December 3, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 3, 2014 They'll be rebanning The Werewolf and the Yeti next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members nfc90210 Posted December 5, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 5, 2014 (edited) Edit: Nevermind Edited February 21, 2021 by nfc90210 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members JNLister Posted December 6, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 6, 2014 To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway. Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members bAzTNM#1 Posted December 6, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 6, 2014 (edited) Six months on bail – for being sent spoof video of a ‘tiger’ having sex, that was really a man in a tiger suit The Crown Prosecution Service said it only recognised that it was a man when the tiger was heard on the soundtrack saying “that’s grrrrrrreat”, like Tony the Tiger from Frosties’ breakfast cereal adverts. Just want to throw that out there as I think it's hilarious. Six months on bail?!?!? This fucking country. Edited December 6, 2014 by bAzTNM#1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Thunderplex Posted December 6, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 6, 2014 To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway. Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man. Where does racial discrimination and abortion come into the realm of entertainment? Bit of a piss poor argument there Lister, letting yourself down a bit son. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handspants Posted December 6, 2014 Share Posted December 6, 2014 urethral sounding I just looked up what that is; and, well... each to their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members JNLister Posted December 6, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 6, 2014 To be honest, there's nothing on the banned list that I'd want to watch anyway. Well that's fine then. On a similar note, I'd be fine with legalising racial discrimination and banning abortion because I'm a white man. Where does racial discrimination and abortion come into the realm of entertainment? Bit of a piss poor argument there Lister, letting yourself down a bit son. Nope, both you and (devil's advocate me) are fine with unfair laws as long as they don't directly affect ourselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Thunderplex Posted December 6, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 6, 2014 Where did I state I was fine with the law? I just said that I dont watch porn that involves the scenes mentioned. Two out of two there Lister. Have you not had your weetabix today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.