Paid Members Jazzy G Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 The chronicle is reporting that there is interest from the Saudi government owners of Newcastle in buying WWE. Would it be considered irony if instead of Vince buying Newcastle, as was rumoured so many times, Newcastle end up buying WWE? https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-owners-tipped-wwe-25919293.amp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsurutagun Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 I say the Saudis take advantage of Eddie Howe's knowledge of late 80s Memphis wrestling and have him book Raw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Jazzy G Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 The training ground will be renamed the performance centre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 Make Bray Why Aye the champion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 (edited) Well, looks like the sale is on - Vince is back I think specifically to oversee the sale and give it validity. CNBC article about the sale - Quote Vince McMahon is back at WWE to ensure a smooth sale process. Here’s who might want to buy it… Vince McMahon has returned to the World Wrestling Entertainment board of directors to facilitate potential sale talks ahead of the company’s media rights renewal. The notion of WWE selling isn’t new. CNBC reported it looked like a sale target in April and that it appeared only more attractive in July after a sexual misconduct scandal. The rationale is fairly straightforward: WWE is valuable intellectual property. Owning IP allows streaming services to exclusively offer content without the annoyance of winning licensing rights in an auction every few years. WWE also has value to offer in merchandising and theme park businesses. WWE has hired JPMorgan to help the company advise on a potential sale, according to people familiar with the matter. JPMorgan declined to comment. A WWE spokesman couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. If a deal occurs, it would likely occur in the next three to six months, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. WWE plans to talk to potential buyers before it makes a decision on TV rights renewal agreements. Facilitating a sale McMahon’s return should help a sale process go smoothly, though there could still be hiccups. The former CEO and chair is 77 years old and the controlling shareholder of WWE. He stepped down after an investigation found that he had paid nearly $15 million to four women over 16 years to quell claims of alleged sexual misconduct and infidelity. Returning to the board will give potential buyers confidence he’s supportive of the details of any transaction. “My return will allow WWE, as well as any transaction counterparties, to engage in these processes knowing they will have the support of the controlling shareholder,” McMahon said in a statement Thursday. McMahon’s return doesn’t affect current leadership. McMahon’s daughter, Stephanie, and former CAA agent Nick Khan are co-CEOs. But it remains unclear what type of role, if any, McMahon would want at WWE if he sold the company. WWE has told investors that McMahon’s role at the company is essential in “our ability to create popular characters and creative storylines.” Currently, McMahon doesn’t have a formal say in the company’s creative direction. Whether a buyer would be comfortable with McMahon taking a more hands-on role at the company is unknown. But WWE is McMahon’s life work. It’s possible a sale may only happen with at least some strings attached. WWE has a market capitalization of more than $6 billion after rising nearly 17% percent on Friday, buoyed by heightened sale speculation. There are three categories of likely buyers for WWE — the legacy media companies, the streamers and the entertainment holding companies. Here’s who might be interested. Comcast Comcast, which owns NBCUniversal, is a potential fit as a buyer for WWE. McMahon’s company already has an exclusive streaming deal with Comcast’s streaming service, Peacock, and a cable TV deal with NBCUniversal’s USA Network. Comcast has a market capitalization of more than $160 billion and can easily afford the company — especially with a $9 billion (or more) check coming as soon as January 2024 from Disney for a 33% stake in Hulu. Comcast can lock up WWE in perpetuity without having to pay upcoming rights renewal increases and can use the company’s IP for theme parks, movies and other spinoff series. Still, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said in October “the bar is the highest it’s been in terms of M&A” and has repeatedly said the company isn’t in a rush to pursue an acquisition. Fox Fox seems less likely than Comcast to pull off a deal for WWE given its significantly smaller balance sheet (and its $17 billion market valuation), its ongoing dalliance with recombining with News Corp., and its lack of presence in the global streaming wars. Still, Fox also has an existing linear TV deal with WWE for Friday Night Smackdown, and the company may feel the time is right to increase scale given its News Corp. merger ambitions. Fox sold off most of its entertainment assets in its $71 billion sale to Disney in 2019, but WWE fits with the smaller company’s sports and live events focus. Disney Returning CEO Bob Iger may want to make a splashy acquisition as he retakes the throne at Disney. WWE fits Disney in the same ways that it fits Comcast. It would bolster Disney’s streaming ambitions (perhaps ESPN+), it would support the linear network business, and it would add some heft to merchandizing and theme park businesses. Comcast didn’t want Disney walking away with Fox in 2019 and drove up the price by tens of billions by topping Iger’s initial bid. Could Iger see WWE as the next IP battle between Disney and his rival Comcast? Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav has spent the beginning of his tenure over the merged WarnerMedia and Discovery cutting costs to better position his company for the future. Spending billions on an acquisition at this stage may run counter to his strategy — especially when it’s unclear where live sports fits in the company’s broader portfolio of assets. Still, Zaslav has said both publicly and privately that while he’s not interested in renting sports rights, he would be interested in deals that give the company ownership over IP. WWE is one of only a small handful of assets that fit this premise. Rival wrestling league AEW currently has a traditional carriage rights deal with Warner Bros. that expires this year. Netflix Netflix has long shied away from sports and other live events, but it’s recently become open to the idea of owning a league outright or taking an ownership stake. Owning a sports league would give Netflix the ability to create video games and spinoff series without friction. Netflix found success in its Formula 1 “Drive to Survive” documentary series, giving co-CEO Reed Hastings faith that certain sports properties will resonate with Netflix’s huge global audience. But Netflix doesn’t own Formula 1, limiting its future options. Acquiring WWE or another sports league would be a path toward offering live entertainment without renting content — similar to Zaslav’s thinking. “We’ve not seen a profit path to renting big sports,” said co-CEO Ted Sarandos last month at the UBS Global TMT Conference. “We’re not anti-sports; we’re just pro-profit.” Amazon Amazon is perennially around the hoop when it comes to acquiring sports content, from spending $1 billion per year on Thursday Night Football to streaming Major League Baseball games to exclusively broadcasting a bunch of Premiere League soccer games. Amazon could bolster Prime Video with live matches and WWE’s library content while easily boosting merchandizing opportunities through its gigantic e-commerce business. Unlike Apple, which is also interested in sports rights but has almost no history of doing multibillion acquisitions, Amazon spent $8.45 billion on MGM and $13.7 billion for Whole Foods. That suggests the company has the DNA to buy big. Endeavor Group Holdings Endeavor, run by superagent Ari Emanuel, could add WWE to its stable of assets after agreeing to buy 100% of UFC in 2021. Emanuel bought UFC to increase the scope of the talent agency’s business to live events. WME-IMG, now just a part of Endeavor, represents many UFC athletes — as well as WWE superstars. The UFC deal has been a success for Endeavor, which paid about seven times 2016′s $600 million revenue in 2016. UFC generated more than $1 billion in revenue in 2022. Endeavor’s enterprise value of just about $11 billion makes WWE a huge swing for the company. The company’s relatively small balance sheet would likely prevent Endeavor from winning a bidding war against media giants. But McMahon’s outsized personality may fit with the brash Emanuel and UFC President Dana White. Selling to a third party would also allow WWE to increase rights renewals every few years. That may or may not be a positive for the long-term future of the company as the media distribution ecosystem changes. Liberty Media While Endeavor owns UFC, Liberty’s Formula One Group owns Formula 1. John Malone, Liberty’s controlling shareholder, and CEO Greg Maffei, along with Formula 1 CEO Stefano Domenicali, have figured out how to globally market the car racing league, including cracking American culture after decades of obscurity. Malone and Maffei have extensive track records at maximizing media valuations and acquiring media assets for less than $10 billion, including Formula 1, Sirius XM and Pandora. The global success of Formula 1 could provide a roadmap for a future WWE strategy. Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC. Edited January 7, 2023 by Loki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gaffer Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 I'd be up for Amazon for the inevitable tie in Prime ads on TV showing Lesnar, Reigns and Goldberg charging through peoples doors to deliver their packages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Your Fight Site Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 What is the big appeal with selling, though? The company still has to be operated? How does changing owners magically make the company more valuable for shareholders? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members gmoney Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 1 minute ago, Your Fight Site said: What is the big appeal with selling, though? The company still has to be operated? How does changing owners magically make the company more valuable for shareholders? Prospect of a bidding war will increase the share price. If it's taken into private hands then your shares will be bought for a tidy sum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Your Fight Site Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 9 minutes ago, gmoney said: Prospect of a bidding war will increase the share price. If it's taken into private hands then your shares will be bought for a tidy sum. But then you could also sell your shareholding if you wanted their value paying out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members gmoney Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 Not at the inflated price after a bidding war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Land Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 36 minutes ago, Your Fight Site said: What is the big appeal with selling, though? The company still has to be operated? How does changing owners magically make the company more valuable for shareholders? Before the bidding war for the last domestic broadcast rights the WWE stock was dependable $.12 a quarter and the stock price would be lucky to float around $20. Then came those massive bids that came close to matching the overall value of the company. That's when speculators jumped in due to the onging M&A environment with different companies being snapped up for content. They've been gambling on a sale which has drove up the price. These next set of media rights might be the peak as people are expecting the bubble to burst. Either way once they're locked into new deals there's no obvious avenues for growth for years after that. No growth means the price stagnants, speculators cash out at a high, price drops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Supremo Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 I’m desperate for a sale and a whole new team in creative. Sick of Hunter’s Diet Vince approach. Pro-wrestling can be whatever you want it to be. It being slightly better than the worst product of all time isn’t an achievement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Jesse Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 A sale isn't necessarily likely to see a sea change in creative. They're operating a lucrative business right now, if someone's paying a high price for that then chances are it'll come with people staying contracted in key positions to make sure the golden goose keeps laying eggs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Jazzy G Posted January 7, 2023 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2023 I wonder how Tony Khan would react if Warner bought WWE. As entertaining as AEW can be, if they own WWE they have even more control over the product. Do you keep AEW on TBS/TNA until the WWE TV deals are up and then kick AEW off once you can stick Raw & Smackdown on? The Comcast/Disney bidding war seems like the obvious course, unless the Newcastle rumour is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Land Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 15 minutes ago, jazzygeofferz said: I wonder how Tony Khan would react if Warner bought WWE. As entertaining as AEW can be, if they own WWE they have even more control over the product. Do you keep AEW on TBS/TNA until the WWE TV deals are up and then kick AEW off once you can stick Raw & Smackdown on? The Comcast/Disney bidding war seems like the obvious course, unless the Newcastle rumour is true. There's been nothing from WBD to suggest they'd be willing to pay $6+bn right now. Hell, they're pennypinching trying to find cuts after the WB-Discovery merger. They get suggested as on paper it makes sense. Content is king afterall. It'd be a pretty easy transition. AEW's deal is up at the end of the year, but there has been the suggestion of a one year option for WBD to extend. WBD just wind it down as there's a wait to get WWE content on their station. The wider worry that people have speculated on has been Comcast buying WBD. Which would in a roundabout way be the same thing if Comcast ends up buying WWE or locked into the next set of media rights. If it's a media company that buys WWE I can see it being Comcast. Not just for the current/historical links with NBCUniversal, but because there's the expectation they will sell their stake in HULU to Disney next year. They'd be cash rich and should more than cover the purchase price of WWE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.