patiirc Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 I never went crazy about Warrior's in ring work, and have certainly never seen that ever noted as 'overrated' either. He didnt need to be a technician in the ring, he didn't need to have a massive repertoire either. Power, paint, shake the ropes, tell a story and toodle pip. Everyone shits on the WCW stuff, wrestling had moved on, Warrior hadn't because he was still an attraction and a draw without having to have technical matches or indeed busting out springboard planchas or whatever else was starting to come to the fore as the star was fading. It always bothers me when looking back at this measured against more modern eyes, where everyone seems to have to know about 150 wristlock variations, yet are still doing sequences to finishers in most modern wrestling. Difference now is that its more artistic rather than Clothesline, Gorilla Press, and and the rest of it. There wasnt a need for wrestlers to be amazing in ring then, the stories told were where the magic was, not about in ring ability and I fear that's where wrestling lost itself so much in the intervening years.     Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members BomberPat Posted September 14, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 14, 2021 Not having that. Warrior was bollocks by the standards of the time too - that's why he got all those Observer awards, that's why everyone who worked with him hated the experience, why his run on top was cut short. Even in the good matches - against Hogan, Rude or Savage and laid out by Pat Patterson, basically situations where it would be nigh on impossible to have a bad match - his timing is awful, he's out of position, he clocks his opponent on the side of the head because he rushes into his clothesline spot quicker than they're expecting, he's blown up two minutes in. It's not about not knowing how to do springboard planchas and somersaults - there were plenty of guys drawing big money in 1998 doing nothing of the sort - it's having an extremely limited repertoire and not even reliably being able to perform that. In 1998 it wasn't that he was an old fashioned worker who couldn't keep up, it was that he never could keep up, only now everyone saw through his smoke and mirrors too.  It's hard to call him overrated, because since his retirement his ability has probably been publicly dissected by the likes of the WWE Self-Destruction DVD more than anyone else and his weaknesses are widely known. But it's far more disingenuous to present him as someone left behind by changing tastes rather than as someone who had always been pushed beyond his ability, and therefore necessarily had a short shelf life as people were quicker to see through the bluster and the gimmicks than they ordinarily would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patiirc Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, BomberPat said: Not having that. Warrior was bollocks by the standards of the time too - that's why he got all those Observer awards, that's why everyone who worked with him hated the experience, why his run on top was cut short. Even in the good matches - against Hogan, Rude or Savage and laid out by Pat Patterson, basically situations where it would be nigh on impossible to have a bad match - his timing is awful, he's out of position, he clocks his opponent on the side of the head because he rushes into his clothesline spot quicker than they're expecting, he's blown up two minutes in. It's not about not knowing how to do springboard planchas and somersaults - there were plenty of guys drawing big money in 1998 doing nothing of the sort - it's having an extremely limited repertoire and not even reliably being able to perform that. In 1998 it wasn't that he was an old fashioned worker who couldn't keep up, it was that he never could keep up, only now everyone saw through his smoke and mirrors too.  It's hard to call him overrated, because since his retirement his ability has probably been publicly dissected by the likes of the WWE Self-Destruction DVD more than anyone else and his weaknesses are widely known. But it's far more disingenuous to present him as someone left behind by changing tastes rather than as someone who had always been pushed beyond his ability, and therefore necessarily had a short shelf life as people were quicker to see through the bluster and the gimmicks than they ordinarily would be. He was 'just bollocks' according to da Meltz then? The Observer, I was not aware of at the time, we were lucky to get PWIs at that til the Internet took centre stage in the late 1990s. The Ultimate Warrior has had oodles of stuff post internet burying him in the ring and it's no wonder it's become the prevalent view. It's easier to rag on with today's eyes looking back rather than what was presented at the time.. Since then Wrestlecrap dissection of the shite angles, Warrior's own mental view points post wrestling sing and the damage the trapdoor did to Davey Boy Smith, have all seen this heightened this. You've then 3 matches in WCW which are routinely stated as being Warrior's fault for being shite, by the likes of Wrestlecrap because it is easier to do that than attack Hogan and the rest for power tripping, egotistical wankery, and consumate failure to get fireballs right etc. The Self Destruction of The Ultimate Warrior box set also has a lot to answer for too. No ones ever going to claim he is the best in ring worker of all time and he never needed to be.   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 1 hour ago, BomberPat said:  repertoire Have an upvote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Carbomb Posted September 14, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 14, 2021 Just for clarity, at no point in my particular post did I make any reference to flippy moves or technical wizardry when criticising Warrior, because I'm not a dribbler. As Pat #1 has pointed out, there were plenty of comparable wrestlers throughout Warrior's career who didn't do any of that either, and were still several orders better. Hell, a big chunk of this thread has been spent agreeing in detail with the praise for Hogan, mainly for the fact he did so much with so little! Pulling out the "he didn't need to do Canadian Destroyers or SSPs" argument as a response to criticism of him being an incredibly limited worker belongs in the same box as calling all wrestling fans virgins who've never touched boob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrodyGraham Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 2 hours ago, Carbomb said: Â Pulling out the "he didn't need to do Canadian Destroyers or SSPs" argument as a response to criticism of him being an incredibly limited worker belongs in the same box as calling all wrestling fans virgins who've never touched boob. I take offence to that. I'm touching my boob right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted September 14, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 14, 2021 Dave Meltzer's clear agenda for and against certain wrestlers or styles of wrestling should not be a measuring point of quality or lack thereof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members air_raid Posted September 15, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 15, 2021 16 hours ago, Maikeru said: WON readers seemed to think so at least in '89 through '91(see post above). Did they? Or did they just think he was crap? There’s a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maikeru Posted September 15, 2021 Author Share Posted September 15, 2021 1 hour ago, air_raid said: Did they? Or did they just think he was crap? There’s a difference. He won the ‘most overrated wrestler’ award three years running. Not sure if that was voted for by readers or if that was just Meltzer himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members gmoney Posted September 15, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 15, 2021 Overrated in that sense just means over pushed, which I think is a different discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awards Moderator HarmonicGenerator Posted September 15, 2021 Awards Moderator Share Posted September 15, 2021 (edited) Here's the Observer list of 'Most Overrated' award winners from 1980 onwards. 1980 Mr. Wrestling II 1981 Pedro Morales 1982, 1983 Bob Backlund 1984 Big John Studd 1985, 1986, Hulk Hogan 1987, 1988 Dusty Rhodes 1989, 1990, 1991 The Ultimate Warrior 1992 Erik Watts 1993 Sid Vicious 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, Hulk Hogan 1999, 2000 Kevin Nash 2001 The Undertaker 2002, 2003, 2004, Triple H 2005 Jeff Jarrett 2006 Batista 2007 The Great Khali 2008 Vladimir Kozlov 2009 Triple H 2010 Kane 2011 Crimson 2012 Ryback 2013 Randy Orton 2014, 2015 Kane 2016 Roman Reigns 2017 Jinder Mahal 2018, 2019 Baron Corbin 2020 Bray Wyatt.  Of those, there are a few I think would qualify as "criticised as overrated to such an extent that they became underrated". Batista in 2006 might have not been at his best in-ring (especially since he vacated the title at the start of the year and disappeared for a while) but his star power is definitely undervalued - they'd love someone on his level right now. Roman Reigns in 2016 is another one - that's the year he had some cracking matches with AJ Styles for one thing. That's a good case of being called overrated so much he became underrated. Possibly even Hogan... I didn't watch masses of him in the 90s but a five-year unbroken stretch of being considered overrated, he must have done some decent stuff within that. Edited September 15, 2021 by HarmonicGenerator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyAnderson Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 That list suggests more overrated by companies than by fans. And by overrated it probably does account to overpushed. So they need to reevaluate what they mean by "overrated" because there's a big difference between who's overrated by fans and who's overpushed by companies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidB6937 Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 Kevin Nash being on that list at all just means it's complete bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 I’d love a company with that list as it’s roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Carbomb Posted September 15, 2021 Paid Members Share Posted September 15, 2021 Given Watts', Mahal's, and Corbin's presence on that list, it does read as companies overpushing them being the metric - I don't think I've ever heard or read any fan rating any of those three ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.