Factotum Posted February 15, 2022 Posted February 15, 2022 I imagine it was for a princely sum (sorry) Civil cases in the US usually always end up like this so no shock. I think a load of it is going to her charity so fair play to her. I imagine the FBI investigation is still looking into him. Quote
westlondonmist Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 16 hours ago, Factotum said: I imagine it was for a princely sum (sorry) Civil cases in the US usually always end up like this so no shock. I think a load of it is going to her charity so fair play to her. If she didn't donate to her own charity/foundation then I think she ran a risk of the media calling her a money grabber. Also I wouldn't be surprised if that was forced so Andrew could spin it as a donation on his part and that he wanted to give help to abused women. Quote
Paid Members chokeout Posted February 16, 2022 Paid Members Posted February 16, 2022 18 minutes ago, westlondonmist said: If she didn't donate to her own charity/foundation then I think she ran a risk of the media calling her a money grabber. Also I wouldn't be surprised if that was forced so Andrew could spin it as a donation on his part and that he wanted to give help to abused women. A charity donation is tax deducted as well, which is very helpful if he's footing the bill himself Quote
Paid Members Ronnie Posted February 16, 2022 Paid Members Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) It's a good job he had £12 million lying around ... It doesn't really give one the impression that he'd have been found not guilty whilst not breaking a sweat in the courtroom, does it? Edited February 16, 2022 by Ronnie Quote
westlondonmist Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 1 hour ago, chokeout said: A charity donation is tax deducted as well, which is very helpful if he's footing the bill himself That's a fairly good point. He will get plenty back, although we don't know where the money is coming from yet. Something I would really like to know. Quote
Paid Members stumobir Posted February 16, 2022 Paid Members Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) Our Head of State paying to bail out a sex offender, another day on Normal Island. ETA: While the state broadcaster runs a story on their app and website titled “Is there a way back for Prince Andrew?” Yup, completely normal, now doff your cap, pleb. Edited February 16, 2022 by stumobir Quote
Factotum Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 7 hours ago, chokeout said: A charity donation is tax deducted as well, which is very helpful if he's footing the bill himself I believe the money will be donated from her to her charity, not paid directly from the pervert's mother. Quote
King Coconut Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 According to the BBC "A statement from their lawyers said the duke would pay an undisclosed sum to Ms Giuffre and make a "substantial donation" to Ms Giuffre's charity in support of victims' rights." Quote
Mr_Danger Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 What’s the chances Peedy leaning in to right wing media now he’s been shunned by his inbred overlords? If the right people throw enough money at him he could be spouting the same old “Lefties are out to get me brother, Me and Jeff were framed, I once saw mums lizard fanny.” Or is that too much of a stretch even by his low moral standards. Quote
Paid Members Chris B Posted February 17, 2022 Paid Members Posted February 17, 2022 19 hours ago, Mr_Danger said: What’s the chances Peedy leaning in to right wing media now he’s been shunned by his inbred overlords? If the right people throw enough money at him he could be spouting the same old “Lefties are out to get me brother, Me and Jeff were framed, I once saw mums lizard fanny.” Or is that too much of a stretch even by his low moral standards. My immediate reaction was 'nah', but that's on the clear desperation he has to be the favourite. Once she's dead, that entire family is going to go even weirder. Quote
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted March 22, 2022 Author Paid Members Posted March 22, 2022 Well this is going to be something. Quote
Keith Houchen Posted March 22, 2022 Posted March 22, 2022 4 minutes ago, Devon Malcolm said: Well this is going to be something. I wonder if they’ll mention the duet with Marc Almond? Quote
Factotum Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 Why don't, instead of all these talking heads saying how 'he created a screen to hide behind' they just play John Lydon calling out what was going on in 1978 over and over. Quote
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted March 23, 2022 Author Paid Members Posted March 23, 2022 22 minutes ago, Factotum said: Why don't, instead of all these talking heads saying how 'he created a screen to hide behind' they just play John Lydon calling out what was going on in 1978 over and over. Because John Lydon is a cunt and nobody cares what he thinks in 2022. Quote
Factotum Posted March 23, 2022 Posted March 23, 2022 16 minutes ago, Devon Malcolm said: Because John Lydon is a cunt and nobody cares what he thinks in 2022. Well considering the interview was from 1978 on a BBC radio interview which was subsequently buried, I don't really think your retort has any point. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.