Paid Members Tommy! Posted August 27, 2015 Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 To be fair if you look that bad and are making that kind of money whoring yourself out I bet you would need a new fanny. Must look like an exploded strawberry pop tart. Quote
Pinc Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Let's all share the story to our Facebook feeds so that our loved ones can also snear at the sub-humans. The Mail deserves the boost to it's traffic for providing such a great public service. Edited August 27, 2015 by Pinc Quote
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted August 27, 2015 Author Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 What reaction should we have for a mother who encourages her young daughter to strip in order to pay for the both of them to have ridiculous amounts of plastic surgery. Like I said, there's obviously some mental health issues there but they doesn't make them look any less like aliens. Quote
Pinc Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 I don't know. Some reaction that doesn't have the MailOnline playing you like a violin? Do have a look at the sidebar while you're there if you enjoyed that story, you'd buzz off it. Quote
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted August 27, 2015 Author Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) Oh, piss off. I'm well aware of the kind of newspaper the Mail is. I'm sure they paid the mental mother and her daughter a decent chunk of change for this "story" so they can't really complain at the reaction they're getting, can they? Probably paid for the next round of surgery. You realise you're sneering at us sneerers here, right? Edited August 27, 2015 by SpursRiot2012 Quote
Pinc Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Yeah but it's not the sneering per se. It's the two pages of outrage at an article transparently calculated to provoke exactly that response. I mean for fuck's sake. You're a clickbaiter's dream. Quote
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted August 27, 2015 Author Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 I don't think anybody is outraged, are they? It's been two pages of mocking, mostly. Quote
Paid Members unfitfinlay Posted August 27, 2015 Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 Yeah but it's not the sneering per se. It's the two pages of outrage at an article transparently calculated to provoke exactly that response. I mean for fuck's sake. You're a clickbaiter's dream. I'm really not sure what you're getting upset about. Someone posted an article and people commented on it. Sure, the comments are negative but it's not like there's a positive way to take someone pimping out their daughter so they can both get terrible plastic surgery is it? How does that make anybody a "clickbaiter's dream?" Incidentally, I'd say it's surprisingly balanced from the Mail. Obviously, it's a negative article but it's made up mainly of quotes with little editorialising, unlike how folk on benefits are always "shameless" and "raking it in" and whatever. Quote
Paid Members FLips Posted August 27, 2015 Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 God forbid anyone reacts to anything. Fuck off Pinc, you're a clickbaiter's dream. Quote
Pinc Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 Yeah but it's not the sneering per se. It's the two pages of outrage at an article transparently calculated to provoke exactly that response. I mean for fuck's sake. You're a clickbaiter's dream. I'm really not sure what you're getting upset about. Someone posted an article and people commented on it. Sure, the comments are negative but it's not like there's a positive way to take someone pimping out their daughter so they can both get terrible plastic surgery is it? How does that make anybody a "clickbaiter's dream"? Do you need it explained, aye? Because the article is trivial shite, written to provoke a sneering, titillated response, and thereby compel the reader to share it among other would-be readers. Which is exactly what Nostalgia Nonce did. It's the journalistic equivalent of a minion meme and yiz fell for it. For shame. Quote
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted August 27, 2015 Author Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 So people can't comment on anything unless it's Pulitzer Prize worthy journalism? What are you on about? You're right, we've all been had. What fools we are. Quote
Paid Members Tommy! Posted August 27, 2015 Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 I think Pinc might be the sugar daddy who got caught by his wife. I'm calling it. Quote
Pinc Posted August 27, 2015 Posted August 27, 2015 So people can't comment on anything unless it's Pulitzer Prize worthy journalism? What are you on about? You're right, we've all been had. What fools we are. No, you can comment on whatever you like. But if a Mail journalist composes an article with the clear intention of priming gimps to gawp at some freaks and click share, and then some gimps do as they've been directed, others will recognise them as gimps. Quote
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted August 27, 2015 Paid Members Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) So, because it's in the Mail's clickbait section, I'm not allowed to be outraged/appalled/whatever by a woman pimping her daughter out to pay for her lip injections? Which publication's articles am I allowed to have opinions on, sneering or otherwise? That can be the thing I learn today. Edited October 3, 2015 by Nostalgia Nonce Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.