Jump to content

Random thoughts thread v2 *NO NEWS ITEMS*


Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted

 

 

 

Not to be picky but means Smackdown would need 40% not a third. 

 

 

Quite picky.

 

 

Yeah, You wouldn't find our Pitcos being pedantic like that!

Posted

 

 

 

 

Not to be picky but means Smackdown would need 40% not a third. 

 

 

Quite picky.

 

 

Yeah, You wouldn't find our Pitcos being pedantic like that!

 

 

Learn the difference between a comma and a full stop.

Posted

I've been trying to work out your maths for a good few minutes and still can't work it out. I'm shit at maths but feel I need to know now.

Posted

I've been trying to work out your maths for a good few minutes and still can't work it out. I'm shit at maths but feel I need to know now.

 

Raw 3 hours + Smackdown 2 Hours = 5 hours.

 

1 hour = 20% of programming so Smackdown is 40% at 2 hours and Raw is 60%

  • Paid Members
Posted

Raw is 50% longer that smackdown.

 

2hrs of SD

3hrs of raw

 

Raw is 150% of smackdown, an increase of 50%.

 

Raw is 3/5 of the total air time, which is 60% of tv time.

 

Maths is shit 110% of the time.

  • Paid Members
Posted

If you split the brands, then it seems logical to take Raw and Smackdown as separate entities, rather than parts of a sum that equals 5 hours. In which case, Smackdown is 2/3 the length of raw, so they would theoretically "need" 2/3's of the roster of Raw to have an equivalent amount of talent. E.g. if Raw has 60 wrestlers, Smackdown has 40. That's numberwang.

Posted

Raw is 50% longer that smackdown.

 

2hrs of SD

3hrs of raw

 

Raw is 150% of smackdown, an increase of 50%.

 

Raw is 3/5 of the total air time, which is 60% of tv time.

 

Maths is shit 110% of the time.

It looks so simple now. Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...