Jump to content

Survivor Series 2024 - November 30th


Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
1 hour ago, The King of Old School said:

Nia Jax is the best.

More personality than the rest of the women's division combined.

The only thing she has more of than personality is clumsiness. She has more clumsiness than the rest of the roster, male and female combined. 

  • Paid Members
Posted

I forgot to ask, did they get Samantha Irvin back or was that Lillian Garcia doing a Samantha Irvin impression?

  • Paid Members
Posted
22 minutes ago, FLips said:

I forgot to ask, did they get Samantha Irvin back or was that Lillian Garcia doing a Samantha Irvin impression?

It was Smackdown Ring Announcer Alicia Taylor who in the last few months seemed to be copying a lot of Irvin’s traits https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Warrington

Been a Drummer for forum fave Kate Nash

  • Paid Members
Posted
On 12/1/2024 at 7:00 PM, Lion_of_the_Midlands said:

Do WWE have a big Japanese show in the not to distant future?

Sorry to quote myself like a bellend but Nakamura is wrestling on the January 1st Noah PPV. Sending a champion makes WWE look more serious  in the whole partnership stakes. 

Posted
2 hours ago, FLips said:

I forgot to ask, did they get Samantha Irvin back or was that Lillian Garcia doing a Samantha Irvin impression?

Feel like pure shit just want Samantha back. Or failing that, Mike Rome. 

Posted
7 hours ago, OzExile said:

Feel like pure shit just want Samantha back. Or failing that, Mike Rome. 

Got confused for a second and thought you meant Mike Adamle and didn't think things were that bad.

Posted (edited)

I dont necessarily mind War Games, I just don't think there needs to be two of them every year.

Feels like they are giving the Women a War Games match because they think they have too, rather than letting a story naturally unfold where one makes sense.

Should just be one War Games match each year, not fussed if it's a mens match or womens match as long as the story that gets to it makes sense.

Edited by The King of Old School
Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 2:34 AM, simonworden said:

As someone who trained and worked for years in another country to most of the roster, surely he's bringing another perspective to learn and work with. To me he's almost a 2006 Findlay in a role where they can heat him up, pop him up the card and back down while he works with different guys and teachers them a few things in the ring. Having guys with different styles and decades of experience is definitely valuable. I'd dare say having him on cards probably shifts a few tickets to long time hardcore fans as well. 

I imagine it's this and him being a respected hand who can speak Japanese. You can roll him out to talk to the Japanese press or have him mentor someone who speaks Japanese but isn't as confident in English. It's one of those things where there's probably reasons for things beyond what we see on the screen. 

It's interesting that Tanahashi is president of NJPW, Nakamura is an amateur surfer who sometimes wrestles for WWE and Shibata is training young wrestlers on how to headbutt each other for real. 

Wonder if anyone had all 3 of those on their bingo cards. 

Posted
14 hours ago, AndyUK said:

Give War Games a rest next year, I reckon.

It’s a match type I struggle to enjoy. That portion in which no one can win - it drags for me. I’d like some classic Survivor Series-style matches next year, I think.

Posted

Yeah the concept of War Games - two cages etc - is a solid one but the beginning part is absolutely daft. They shouldn't be scared to update the rules and adapt for 2024.

I wouldn't be against resting it for a bit, simply because I do find it a bit samey and annoying on a schedule. Fine if they've got a decent feud to be putting in there but not when you've got a bunch of random women and then you decide to make Nia Jax wrestle the whole fucking thing.

Posted
4 hours ago, DavidB6937 said:

Yeah the concept of War Games - two cages etc - is a solid one but the beginning part is absolutely daft. They shouldn't be scared to update the rules and adapt for 2024.

I think Vince Russo tried that in 2000. 

Actually, I'm surprised they haven't brought back the triple cage yet. 

Posted (edited)

Do people find the old WCW/NWA War Games matches shit because of the rules? Genuinely curious because the whole nobody can win until everyone is in, never bothered me personally that much. Obviously an example but War Games 1992 (which is still the best ever), felt like the whole bit before The Match Beyond stip felt perfect because it was 10 blokes who just wanted to use that time to beat and bloody each other senseless.

Edited by Chili
Posted
10 minutes ago, Chili said:

Do people find the old WCW/NWA War Games matches shit because of the rules? Genuinely curious because the whole nobody can win until everyone is in, never bothered me personally that much. Obviously an example but War Games 1992 (which is still the best ever), felt like the whole bit before The Match Beyond stip felt perfect because it was 10 blokes who just wanted to use that time to beat and bloody each other senseless.

Can't say I've watched too many of them but no I don't really remember being that bothered about it before, so it could just be a modern booking thing or the fact the commentators don't stop going on about it.

Posted

AEW are missing a trick not nicking the 5 on 5 elimination style match for a pay per view while WWE aren't using it. Match equivalent of accidentally letting the Rock's contract expire. Plus it's an opportunity for more belts.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...