Jump to content

Jimmy Saville


jimufctna24

Opinion  

258 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 986
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Comparing cases is a real straw man. The issue with Harris is a calculated abuse of trust, with a clear pattern of behaviour established, an argument for being caught up in the moment could be put forward for the majority of the lads, but not the instigators, of the Magaluf incident. While not defending the young lads involved the same peer pressure argument put forward for the poor lass could be applied if they failed to accept a free blowie.

 

Make no mistake, if a serial sex offender, like a horny teenager which Harris clearly wasn't, gets away with a bum grope he'll try for fingers and tops, then see how close to home base he can get away with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the betting there's another oddball celebrity arrested in the next few weeks to occupy the tabloids' paedo quota for a while whilst the enquiry talk is quietly swept back under the carpet? Yewtree is smoke and mirrors and it absolutely reeks. Hope Watson and the odd few other dissenters refuse to go quietly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Duane ever came across a theory that he didn't like. I was thinking back to the Hollie Greig thread in gold that resulted in Duane eventually being run off the forum.

 

http://ukff.com/index.php?showtopic=119672

 

The post on page 18 by Loki ripping Duane apart is still thing of beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
http://ukff.com/index.php?showtopic=119672

 

The post on page 18 by Loki ripping Duane apart is still thing of beauty.

 

Just read it...

 

I know many BBC journalists personally, and they're not rolling in wads of cash ripped from the cunts of screaming children.

 

I'm going to have to read the whole thread on the strength of that sentence alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[url="http://ukff.com/index.php?showtopic=119672"]http://ukff.com/index.php?

I know many BBC journalists personally, and they're not rolling in wads of cash ripped from the cunts of screaming children.

 

I'm going to have to read the whole thread on the strength of that sentence alone.

 

:laugh: Forgotten about that. Angry Loki!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet more bad news for the Government.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28257488

 

A man abused by a paedophile priest in Sussex says Baroness Butler-Sloss is the wrong person to lead an inquiry into how public bodies dealt with allegations of child abuse.

 

Phil Johnson says she told him she wanted to exclude his allegations of abuse at the hands of a bishop from a public report because she "cared about the church" and "did not want to give the press a bishop".

 

Baroness Butler-Sloss has now been asked to look into how the government handled allegations of child abuse by senior politicians in the 1980s and has already faced calls to stand down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...