Mr.Showtime Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Dont do it. I'm warning you, life isnt better with its viewing. I should never have brought it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted December 31, 2015 Author Paid Members Share Posted December 31, 2015 I quite like it. It's compulsive viewing. In a sort of Saddam hanging sort of way rather than Rachel Riley stroking her inner thigh. It's memorable at any rate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daaaaaad! Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 I quite like it. It's compulsive viewing. In a sort of Saddam hanging sort of way rather than Rachel Riley stroking her inner thigh. It's memorable at any rate! Â See, this just made me search for the Rachel Riley thing, and now I feel disgusted with myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Kat Von D Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 The fickleness and stupidity behind Internet hate figure choices has been completely exposed by the u-turn on Triple H. For years, he was the evil political burymaster, pulling strings because he was shagging the all-powerful head of creative. And then he became head of creative, and he was still using his evil scheming shovel on Daniel Bryan. But now, somehow the head of creative position is powerless, Triple H can't even get an idea on the telly, and Vince McMahon and Kevin Dunn have seized control of the company. Dribble. Absolute dribble.  The height of HHH backlash was 12 years ago, it's hardly a u-turn. More like a very long journey where general opinion has changed largely due to him being the face of NXT, which pretty much gives fans exactly what they want. If people think he can't get his ideas onto Raw, it's because of the blindingly obvious loss of direction for everyone who gets called up. NXT is thought of highly and presented as his baby, of course he has support now. If he didn't have support you would be moaning about that instead  I know that as the most stubborn person on the internet you won't listen, just want you to know you are wrong about everything on this particular subject Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) Were you not one of the ones crying about evil political mastermind HHH booking Raw to bury Daniel Bryan and CM Punk a couple of years ago then? Edited December 31, 2015 by King Pitcos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DraxSpago Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Were you not one of the ones crying about evil political mastermind HHH booking Raw to bury Daniel Bryan and CM Punk a couple of years ago then? To be fair, him beating Punk when Punk had just become their hot new babyface did have a bit of a cutting his legs off vibe about it, fuck knows who thought that result made any sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Triple H didn't have anything to do with that. He has no power to influence WWE's main roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Triple H didn't have anything to do with that. He has no power to influence WWE's main roster. Booker T? Long time ago mind, but he completely ruined a storyline with not wanting to lose that match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Duke Posted December 31, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted December 31, 2015 He does though. Even if its not official (can't remember if he was head of creative by that point) he's obviously got loads of influence, particularly over his own storylines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awards Moderator HarmonicGenerator Posted December 31, 2015 Awards Moderator Share Posted December 31, 2015 Â Â Triple H didn't have anything to do with that. He has no power to influence WWE's main roster. Booker T? Long time ago mind, but he completely ruined a storyline with not wanting to lose that match. Speaking of that, I've only just realised how much of 2003 was Triple H vs WCW headliners. Scott Steiner followed by Booker T followed by Kevin Nash followed by Goldberg, and that was virtually his whole year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted December 31, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted December 31, 2015 They were trying to get Sting in for that WrestleMania. That was always the plan, not Booker. Â HHH beat Ric Flair as well on Raw. I'm sure he beat The Big Show at one point (everyone else did). He was on quite the misson to finish all the old WCW lot, it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Kat Von D Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 (edited) Were you not one of the ones crying about evil political mastermind HHH booking Raw to bury Daniel Bryan and CM Punk a couple of years ago then?Nope. I thought both should have been booked better at times (because at points it was utter shit) but I never really blamed HHH personally for it as far as I remember. May have had a moan about him from time to time but it's been a very very long time since I blamed him for everything. That was a weak as fuck comeback by the way Edited December 31, 2015 by UK Kat Von D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 He does though. Even if its not official (can't remember if he was head of creative by that point) he's obviously got loads of influence, particularly over his own storylines. Â We would assume so. And yet his own storylines have dominated the main event segments of Raw for the last two and a half years, and he's been head of creative for most of that time, but to certain sections, he bears no responsibility for it. If he actually has lost all his (and Stephanie's) power, he can't have been a great master politician in the first place. That's what makes the u-turn on him so stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam O'Rourke Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 BT Sport/ESPN are showing The Prince of Pennsylvania documentary at midnight. It's the story that Foxcatcher is based upon. It's supposed to be very good. It's fantastic. It's on the US Netflix and is tremendously comprehensive, although it does leave the very real question of how things turned in Du Pont's mind from point A to point B. Though I suppose that's part of the whole issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPW Kristian Zane Posted January 1, 2016 Share Posted January 1, 2016  Were you not one of the ones crying about evil political mastermind HHH booking Raw to bury Daniel Bryan and CM Punk a couple of years ago then? To be fair, him beating Punk when Punk had just become their hot new babyface did have a bit of a cutting his legs off vibe about it, fuck knows who thought that result made any sense  And not only that but R-Truth and Miz helped Hunter at one point despite the stipulation that if Hunter lost he'd lose his power as GM which was something Miz and Truth wanted to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts