Paid Members niff Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 I'm didn't like this recent comeback from Lesnar who looked like a fish out of water in sports entertainment as opposed to UFC. He should've gone for someone else apart from Cena and their match said it all. Â Your taste in pretty much everything depresses me to my very core. Â Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaron Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 I'm didn't like this recent comeback from Lesnar who looked like a fish out of water in sports entertainment as opposed to UFC. He should've gone for someone else apart from Cena and their match said it all. Â Your taste in pretty much everything depresses me to my very core. Â Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Â Mate, the guys emotionally retarded. Don't take his constant trolling too personal like! Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted August 23, 2012 Moderators Share Posted August 23, 2012 Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Â Well what should they have done then? They've only got a very limited number of times they can use him and he'll probably fuck off again at the end of it, so it makes most sense to put him in with the biggest names and squeeze as much buys out of it as they can. Maybe I might use him to make Sheamus at Mania when he's about to fuck off or something, but it's most likely I'm putting him in with the real stars like HBK, HHH, Cena and Taker to make some real money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkship Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 Foley was the first name I thought of when I saw this thread. Everything post-2004 has been terrible. Â As I didn't watch wrestling between 1994-1999, therefore missing his WWF run against Golddust AND his 1996-99 WCW run, you can imagine how I felt about Roddy Piper's 2003 run in WWE. One of my favourite wrestlers of all time, paired with a guy I was psyched for (Sean O'Haire), and yet there he is, 30lbs overweight, dicking about with Zach Gowen and Mr America. His appearance on RAW 1000 was dogshit too. Â Brian Christopher's 2004 run in WWE didn't exactly set the world on fire either. Did he last more than a fortnight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members stumobir Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 Brian Christopher's 2004 run in WWE didn't exactly set the world on fire either. Did he last more than a fortnight? Â Not even a trace of a memory of this? I remember he appeared on Raw in 2010/2011 to have a go at Jerry Lawler but that's it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 I'm didn't like this recent comeback from Lesnar who looked like a fish out of water in sports entertainment as opposed to UFC. He should've gone for someone else apart from Cena and their match said it all. Â Your taste in pretty much everything depresses me to my very core. Â Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Â Putting aside your daft exaggeration and your whining about being allowed an opinion (didn't mention you shouldn't have one, try reading back), I like the fact that you conveniently ignored the fact that Lesnar absolutely battered Cena in that match to almost jobber status and it made him look every bit the monster he is. Â Who should he have wrestled aside from the WWE's top guy and most reliable PPV performer? I hope you don't say CM Punk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awards Moderator HarmonicGenerator Posted August 23, 2012 Awards Moderator Share Posted August 23, 2012 Brian Christopher's 2004 run in WWE didn't exactly set the world on fire either. Did he last more than a fortnight? Â Not even a trace of a memory of this? I remember he appeared on Raw in 2010/2011 to have a go at Jerry Lawler but that's it? Â I remember this vaguely. Was he involved in the Jericho/Christian/Tomko feud somehow? I do recall he didn't last long enough for them to take a proper photo of him for the WWE.com roster page... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarTheSlouch Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 The Quebeccers. From 3x Tag Team Champions in 94 to meaning absoloutly nothing in 98 as well as a rubbish change in outfit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 Fuck yes! The Quebeccers were awesome in 1994. When they returned they were piss poor. No Johnny Polo or Mountie outfits killed the group. I'd sort of been prepared for this, though, since they were shite in WCW in 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsClobberingTime Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 I'm didn't like this recent comeback from Lesnar who looked like a fish out of water in sports entertainment as opposed to UFC. He should've gone for someone else apart from Cena and their match said it all. Â Your taste in pretty much everything depresses me to my very core. Â Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Â Mate, the guys emotionally retarded. Don't take his constant trolling too personal like! Â I can't decide if you really want to fuck niff, or if you secretly fancy Gladstone in a "i hate him!" children in the playground fashion. Â Which one is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members niff Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 I'm didn't like this recent comeback from Lesnar who looked like a fish out of water in sports entertainment as opposed to UFC. He should've gone for someone else apart from Cena and their match said it all. Â Your taste in pretty much everything depresses me to my very core. Â Your constant remarks of my apparent bad taste is really boring now. I'm allowed an opinion and for me I thought Brock's recent comeback could've been so much better and its a bit of a shame considering how excited many fans were. He's had a loss to Cena, and a dull match with HHH but got his win but HHH got the limelight. Â Putting aside your daft exaggeration and your whining about being allowed an opinion (didn't mention you shouldn't have one, try reading back), I like the fact that you conveniently ignored the fact that Lesnar absolutely battered Cena in that match to almost jobber status and it made him look every bit the monster he is. Â Who should he have wrestled aside from the WWE's top guy and most reliable PPV performer? I hope you don't say CM Punk. Â Sheamus or Wade Barrett given his bare knuckle fighting background, but probably Sheamus to start with but I completely understand him coming back for the top guys like you say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Tommy! Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 Sheamus or Wade Barrett given his bare knuckle fighting background, but probably Sheamus to start with  That would have been really wank though.  Lesner Vs Cena was an outstanding match, just truly magnificent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members air_raid Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 He'd have had a job lining up against Wade, he's been injured since Lesnars return until not long from now. And Sheamus? I know he's the secondary champion and that, but you bring in a Brock Lesnar much the same as when Hogan came back, or the limited singles matches we'll see from The Rock. The Brock Lesnar Collection is for Cena, Tripper, Orton, Undertaker and potentially even Shawn Michaels, or Rock himself. Â Mate, the guys emotionally retarded. Don't take his constant trolling too personal like! Â As opposed to just retarded. We've got plenty of them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digforvictory Posted August 23, 2012 Share Posted August 23, 2012 Well since Foley has already been mentioned what about Austin in 2003? Â His run as co GM on Raw was awful and it was the first time I remember being bored with him. That redneck triathalon is one of the worst things the WWE ever produced, just absolute shite. Â His match with Rock at Wrestlemania 19 was good but his run in general was rubbish. All he's done in his appearances since 2003 has been stunning multiple people and then throwing a beer bash. When it's done once or twice a year like it is now it's still enjoyable, having to watch it every week in 2003 was tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted August 23, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 23, 2012 I must disagree. Austin and Bischoff were one of the only things about Raw worth watching. Austin was a featured character and took a step back so he didn't outshine anyone. Austin as GM was great. Bischoff and Austin basically created the blue print for feuding GMs which nobody has came close to topping since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.