sammorgz Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 Get some photos and document it. Will do. Will update my post on Monday when I'm next back there. I'll include a photo of the plaque too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patiirc Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 Finally, been meaning to post this for a few days, but thought was the best place to put it here.  Ghost Adventures couple ends up with a Benoit style tragedy, after she spent years abusing him  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3248948/Ghost-Adventures-star-killed-estranged-wife-boyfriend-abused-years-diminutive-spouse.html  Cray cray ex used to binge watch this all the time, because she was into the paranormal and fancied Zac Bagans something rotten. So have seen a few of the eps with this couple in.  Couple of 'wags' have suggested investigating the flat for the next series. Oh dear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Justice Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 So what do we make of this one then? Â http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/watch-bizarre-video-showing-merman-6523679 Â A video apparently showing a bunch of people in hazmat suits, putting a Merman on a gurney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shucky Ducky Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 It's frightening to think how many people are swayed by what one person can post on the internet. Days after Sandy Hook i had boys in work telling everyone it was 100% a false flag mission, based purely on watching that infamous video that went up on facebook...the same boys were spouting the Boston Marathon stuff. It's interesting shit but these people refuse to even look at any kind of debunking, they just believe it off the bat. I've put a lot of time into the Sandy Hook story & complete crackpot theories aside (Anderson Cooper's nose!!!) There is so much doubt to the official account. Â The main issue is the shooter himself. There is ZERO EVIDENCE Adam Lanza was the shooter, no footage, no DNA, no fingerprints on any of the weapons or bullets. Plus an Aspergers sufferer with no offical shooting experience has a 99% kill ratio? Highly unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieranjennings Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 They did find him dead there with a load of firearms and was seen by eyewitnesses. Does that not count? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted September 29, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted September 29, 2015 Is there actually zero evidence, or is it just that some guy on YouTube is saying that there isn't any? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shucky Ducky Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 They did find him dead there with a load of firearms and was seen by eyewitnesses. Does that not count? He was not identified at the scene by either eyewitnesses or personal ID, he had his brother Ryan's driving licence on him. And there are no public images of his body at the scene. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shucky Ducky Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Is there actually zero evidence, or is it just that some guy on YouTube is saying that there isn't any? There just isn't any The shooters DNA is either "inconclusive" or basically unknown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieranjennings Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Â They did find him dead there with a load of firearms and was seen by eyewitnesses. Does that not count? He was not identified at the scene by either eyewitnesses or personal ID, he had his brother Ryan's driving licence on him. And there are no public images of his body at the scene. Â Â That's not quite true though is it, there were witnesses who saw him enter the school and his body has been post-mortemed after being taken from the scene. What DNA would you expect to be there anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shucky Ducky Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Â Â They did find him dead there with a load of firearms and was seen by eyewitnesses. Does that not count? Â He was not identified at the scene by either eyewitnesses or personal ID, he had his brother Ryan's driving licence on him. And there are no public images of his body at the scene. Â That's not quite true though is it, there were witnesses who saw him enter the school and his body has been post-mortemed after being taken from the scene. What DNA would you expect to be there anyway? DNA would confirm if he was the only shooter involved in the incident, it didn't. The eyewitnesses were (and usually are) unreliable as the statements prove. Also on his post-mortem the offical date of his death was 1 day earlier. (Day of an offical live drill btw) Â Possibly a mistake, but these things are meticulously checked, so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kieranjennings Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015    They did find him dead there with a load of firearms and was seen by eyewitnesses. Does that not count? He was not identified at the scene by either eyewitnesses or personal ID, he had his brother Ryan's driving licence on him. And there are no public images of his body at the scene.  That's not quite true though is it, there were witnesses who saw him enter the school and his body has been post-mortemed after being taken from the scene. What DNA would you expect to be there anyway? DNA would confirm if he was the only shooter involved in the incident, it didn't. The eyewitnesses were (and usually are) unreliable as the statements prove. Also on his post-mortem the offical date of his death was 1 day earlier. (Day of an offical live drill btw)  Possibly a mistake, but these things are meticulously checked, so?  How would DNA confirm he was the only shooter? I don't want to sound rude but I genuinely don't know I think the teacher who saw him face to face and was shot through a door would be pretty accurate if it was the same guy (build/face) etc The death date on the social security records has been explained thoroughly already and would make no sense in a cover up if they put the wrong date (unless they wanted people to think it was a conspiracy, which would make no sense)  Like with most of these things there are always unanswered questions because Joe Public doesn't get to know. When someone puts theories together that fill the gaps, and create a narrative, people find a story easier to believe. The concept of shooting up a school is nuts, people do nuts things for any sort of reason, sometimes cannot be easily explained which is why a good conspiracy narrative makes more sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members FLips Posted September 29, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted September 29, 2015 Has there ever been a false flag that was actually proven to be such. And I mean openly and reliably by the public proven, not spenks on a forum or Youtube proven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members chokeout Posted September 29, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) Plus an Aspergers sufferer with no offical shooting experience has a 99% kill ratio? Highly unlikely. This is the thing that really annoys me about stuff like this. There's no clear evidence one way or another that he did or didn't have any fire arm experience ( although his mother owned guns so it's not a massive streach to assume he was at least familar with them) so it's used as 'proof' of something more sinister. Even so he had a rifle, shooting at children cornered in small rooms. What would you expect the results in a situation like that to be? Edited September 29, 2015 by chokeout Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shucky Ducky Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Â Plus an Aspergers sufferer with no offical shooting experience has a 99% kill ratio? Highly unlikely. This is the thing that really annoys me about stuff like this. There's no clear evidence one way or another that he did or didn't have any fire arm experience ( although his mother owned guns so it's not a massive streach to assume he was at least familar with them) so it's used as 'proof' of something more sinister. Even so he had a rifle, shooting at children cornered in small rooms. What would you expect the results in a situation like that to be? At least more than 2 minor injuries. He was a skinny, sickly kid who wielded a heavy rifle & more ammo than a combat soldier like an expert marksman. It's unheard of Even the Coloumbine killers combined didn't have that much success Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted September 29, 2015 Paid Members Share Posted September 29, 2015 Has there ever been a false flag that was actually proven to be such. And I mean openly and reliably by the public proven, not spenks on a forum or Youtube proven.The Bay of Pigs invasion is a fairly well known one. Germany made several attempts at false flag attacks to make the Polish look like they were a threat to justify them invading Poland in 1939. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.