FUM Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Still can't understand why people won't just accept that Shane McMahon is wrestling this match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Clint Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Shane V Taker is obviously a done deal. There's going to be no swerve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakashi Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Moving away from Reigns, slightly, what if Shane cuts a promo over the next week or two about how he's going to give new guys a go and the man to take his place inside the cell is a returning Cesaro. Â Cesaro, beating Taker at WrestleMania in the Hell in a Cell match, would instantly catapult him up the card to a position most think he deserves to be. He can then dethrone Reigns as champ. Bald, foreign, jobber tag team member with 5% win rate vs Taker at wrestlemania for control of the company? That's too Internet even for the Internet. Â Shane may be a grey haired 46 year old business man, but Cesaro has never been as over as him in his entire career. Maybe with a six month build, but subbing in a jobber 3 weeks before Mania is mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Danger Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Is Cesaro even as over as the New Days trumpet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 (edited) Sounds like an interesting thread idea, things more over than cesaro Edited March 5, 2016 by Louch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakashi Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Sounds like an interesting three idea, things more over than cesaro Hornswoggle, Zack Ryder and Fandango have all been more over at one point than Cesaro ever has. Damn, Hornswoggle really was super over for a year or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambulance Chaser Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 The fat guy at NXT tapings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Carbomb Posted March 4, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted March 4, 2016 Bald, foreign, jobber tag team member with 5% win rate vs Taker at wrestlemania for control of the company? That's too Internet even for the Internet. Â I agreed with the rest of your post, but to the two words in bold: sorry, what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakashi Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Â Bald, foreign, jobber tag team member with 5% win rate vs Taker at wrestlemania for control of the company? That's too Internet even for the Internet. Â I agreed with the rest of your post, but to the two words in bold: sorry, what? Two reasons why Vince won't push him in 2016. Unless you're massively over in spite of being bald (Austin, Hogan) or foreign (no one) then Vince always goes for the local guys that increase business in USA, Mexico or Canada or people with 'the look'. Cesaro drawing an extra seven viewers from Switzerland isn't going to bother Vince. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 One of Scott Keith's obsessions at one point was that WWE would only push you if you had a full head of hair. I can't remember if he was saying this when bald Steve Austin and severely balding The Rock were the top guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakashi Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 One of Scott Keith's obsessions at one point was that WWE would only push you if you had a full head of hair. I can't remember if he was saying this when bald Steve Austin and severely balding The Rock were the top guys. That was Fin Martin too! Â I'm sure being bald is held in the same regard as sneezing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members LaGoosh Posted March 4, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted March 4, 2016 Hogan = bald Austin = bald Rock = bald Ryback = bald  Basically Vince should push Ryback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members ColinBollocks Posted March 4, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted March 4, 2016 Cesaro, of course, being the true anomaly of WWE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Miz girl was more over than him too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Carbomb Posted March 5, 2016 Paid Members Share Posted March 5, 2016 Â Â Bald, foreign, jobber tag team member with 5% win rate vs Taker at wrestlemania for control of the company? That's too Internet even for the Internet. Â I agreed with the rest of your post, but to the two words in bold: sorry, what?Two reasons why Vince won't push him in 2016. Unless you're massively over in spite of being bald (Austin, Hogan) or foreign (no one) then Vince always goes for the local guys that increase business in USA, Mexico or Canada or people with 'the look'. Cesaro drawing an extra seven viewers from Switzerland isn't going to bother Vince. I don't think Austin was over "in spite of" being bald, nor were Billy Graham, Hogan, Goldberg, Anderson, or even D'Lo Brown or Ahmed Johnson. In fact, I could point out that Austin was never as over with hair as he was without it. Â As for being foreign, I was counting Hart, Sheamus and Yokozuna (kayfabe), but fair enough - the exceptions probably prove the rule, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts