Paid Members Au Posted December 9, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 9, 2014 According to the US Patent and Trademark Office, their previous trademarks are still valid. http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:mt6yym.2.3 http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:mt6yym.2.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.PeterVenkman Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 I saw somewhere that Hell in a Cell did 76000 buys worldwide, do WWE make enough off that and the network subs to turn a profit or are they fucked if the subs don't go up substantially? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 He was pretty good at jumping off high stuff and being racist to Japanese people though. I thought TWGTT were a good team, and liked Haas well enough. Just 2 more names for the Lost Generation list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GavinSAFC Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 I'm just watching the 2003 Royal Rumble and have been reminded of some horrific storylines, such as Nathan Jones 'g'dday' vignettes and Dawn Marie marrying and humping Torrie Wilson's dad, who storyline died culminating in them having a stepdaughter v stepmother match where Dawn Marie came to the ring wearing a black veil. Who on earth thought this was a good idea?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Well, it gave us Dawn Marie and Torrie Wilson snogging in that hotel room, which was the exact moment the WWE peaked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GavinSAFC Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Well, it gave us Dawn Marie and Torrie Wilson snogging in that hotel room, which was the exact moment the WWE peaked. Actually, they just aired one of those Sean O'Haire promos where he played like a devil's advocate. Forgot how class they were! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otto Dem Wanz Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 At one point in my life those videos of Torrie and Dawn Marie lezzing it up were the only wank material I needed for about three weeks straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vamp Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 I liked the Nathan Jones vignettes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted December 10, 2014 Paid Members Share Posted December 10, 2014 I honestly thought "well, Brock's going to have to step aside when this bloke turns up" when I saw those Nathan Jones vignettes. They were sensational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 He was fucking huge as well, Matt Morgan size but much meaner looking. They could definitely have made money with him, if he'd had one iota of wrestling talent. 2003 WWE doesn't half look bad compared to some of the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane O' Mac Version 2 Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 One needs to only look at the game roster from Here Comes The Pain to see how great the WWE talent pool was in 2003. For the mix of Attitude Era stars, WCW crossovers, 80s legends and current wrestlers like Cena, Orton and Lesnar in their rookie years, I think it was the greatest single roster in wrestling history. Not the greatest product necessarily, but incredible star power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Chest Rockwell Posted December 10, 2014 Moderators Share Posted December 10, 2014 Not saying you're necessarily wrong, but you're talking about the current stars with the benefit of hindsight. Who knows which guys in the current crop will have that kind of longevity and will be similarly retrospectively re-evaluated in a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undefeated Steak Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 (edited) C&Ped the 2003 roster into a spoiler tag. Name value alone you're right, but there's also a lot of shite in there and very few of the top stars were at the top of their game. Apart from The Game himself, whose run that year gives Pitcos the creeps 11 years on. 1) Edge 2) Christian 3) The Rock 4) Stone Cold 5) Bill Goldberg 6) Kurt Angle 7) Mr. America (Hulk Hogan) 8) The Hurricane 9) Booker T 10) Shawn Michaels 11) Triple H 12) The Undertaker 13) Rob Van Dam 14) Shane McMahon 15) Charlie Haas 16) Shelton Benjamin 17) Tajiri 18) Kane 19) Scott Steiner 20) Ultimo Dragon 21) Spike Dudley 22) Bubba Ray Dudley 23) D-Von Dudley 24) Funaki 25) Goldust 26) Jeff Hardy 27) William Regal 28) Lance Storm 29) Heidenrich 30) Test 31) Randy Orton 32) Chris Benoit 33) Eddie Guerrero 34) Chavo Guerrero 35) Sean O' Haire 36) Maven 37) Al Snow 38) Val Venis 39) Tommy Dreamer 40) Rosey 41) Steve Richards 42) Rodney Mack 43) Rene Dupree 44) Rob Conway 45) Sylvain Grenier 46) Rhyno 47) Batista 48) Rico 49) Jamal 50) D-Lo Brown 51) Doug Basham 52) Danny Basham 53) Orlando Jordon 54) Paul London 55) Spanky (Brian Kendrick) 56) John Cena 57) Brock Lesnar 58) Matt Hardy 59) Bradshaw (JBL) 60) Rey Mysterio 61) Rikishi 62) Nathan Jones 63) Billy Kidman 64) Zack Gowen 65) Ric Flair 66) Crash Holly 67) Hardcore Holly 68) Scotty 2 Hotty 69) Akio (Jimmy Wang Yang) 70) A-Train (Albert) 71) Chuck Palumbo 72) Johnny Stamboli 73) Chris Kanyon 74) Nunzio 75) Matt Morgan 76) Chris Nowinski 77) Bill DeMott 78) Big Show 79) Jamie Noble 80) Shannon Moore Edited December 10, 2014 by Undefeated Steak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane O' Mac Version 2 Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 (edited) Where'd you get that roster from? I see a suspicious lack of Big Show, Chris Jericho, and Mark Henry. Plus, a lot of those shit lower card guys lived on Velocity/Heat. As for looking at current stars with retrospect, that's true, but they had obvious serious potential back then. Looking at current young guys, we get so much of them on TV, it's easy to see what kind of potential they had. The Shield, Wyatt, Bryan- if he can get healthy- big time players in the next few years. Then you have guys with "potential" that have really been around an age like Kofi and Ziggler. I don't think any of those guys have it in them to flip a switch and explode into stardom- maybe a lack of ambition that Vince mentioned, but more likely the controlled corporate environment. Once you've seen a WWE wrestler for 6 months in the current climate, you know what you have with them. Edited December 10, 2014 by Shane O' Mac Version 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted December 10, 2014 Author Paid Members Share Posted December 10, 2014 The problem with 2002/2003 isn't the talent. They had a stacked roster and they kept bringing in anyone who had name value. It was the booking. They hadn't settled on the next formula o they were just constantly trying shit to be edgy and suck back in the crowd they'd lost pretty spectacularly in 2001. Smackdown suffered less from this so was consistently the better show but by 2004/05 it'd fill up with some right toss because Raw was where the big stars went (and there weren't many of them post Rock/Lesnar/Austin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts