patiirc Posted August 3, 2011 Author Share Posted August 3, 2011 All down to Computer Games apparently? Â Nothing like a good knee jerk to blame the games rather than the nut job that did it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Wow. It took the police 15/20 minutes to stop the guy shooting once they got there. That will have cost a lot of lives. I bit dated I know, but I've just read this article (which has been shortened from the original) by everyone's favourite Norwegian who believes that Breivik should have, and could have, been stopped before the police even got the chance to do so; Â There is one question in relation to the Ut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Up Chuck Posted August 8, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 8, 2012 For fuck's sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted August 8, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 8, 2012 He's a retard this Vikernes, isn't he? Not one thing going for him, including his shit music. I'd rather listen to a cat pissing on a drum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Seven Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 He's, like, a visionary, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildSybianRider Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Yeah and I'd still totally give a shit about his music even if I didn't secretly find it cool that he killed someone and hates Kikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members BigJag Posted August 8, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 8, 2012 Why is his point about fighting back being ridiculed? We had the shooting in Wisconsin at the Gurdwara over the weekend. The gunman there was tackled by one of the Sangat. This man was killed sadly. However his actions forced the gunman away from the area he was in. Pushing him towards the police. Where he met his deserved end. If the objection is to Vikernes political views. Fair enough. I don't know enough about Norwegian politics to comment on that. Is Vikernes also not a murderer himself? Time served I believe. I can understand why that would make him less than interesting. However fighting back has to be an option. With that he makes a valid point. Too many people ignore and walk away from bother. I may be missing something. Happy to read what others have to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted August 8, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 8, 2012 It's because he's too stupid to tell the difference between a terrified child and a coward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 The number of left-wing extremists he shot dead never troubled me  Classy guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members BigJag Posted August 9, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 9, 2012 It's because he's too stupid to tell the difference between a terrified child and a coward. Â Weren't they young adults? The camp was for a political party youth wing. Correct? Surely there were older adults supposedly charged with the security of the attendees. How can you prepare for a one man killing machine though.? Why would you even think about it? When the situation presents itself though. How people cope and react in this extreme situation has to be looked at here. One person should not have been able to murder so many people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted August 9, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 9, 2012 Did any of them have a cache of weapons handy, do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members BigJag Posted August 9, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 9, 2012 I doubt it. I'm not blaming anyone. I have no idea how I would act in that situation. It's just shocking to me that he was able to wander around freely murdering for over an hour. I guess it's the difference between his single minded focused objective against the unprepared victims. He was one man against over a hundred. Yet a hundred people were unable to protect themselves against one nutcase. Are we that inept? How was he able to do this? The reports and pictures of his executions are harrowing. A large number of his murders were not a case of him going around spraying bullets. Groups of people were made to kneel down and then they were dispatched. I cannot understand how he was able to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted August 9, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 9, 2012 I doubt it. I'm not blaming anyone. I have no idea how I would act in that situation. Â Well there you go, then. Stop talking shit. Breivik is a convicted murderer and racist. He is a fucking imbecile. He doesn't raise any interesting or debatable points, nor is he interested in doing so. Â All he's interested in doing is taking the grief of a nation (and beyond) and dragging it through the mud to add to his notoriety. I find it amazing you think that there is a pertinent point here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members BigJag Posted August 9, 2012 Paid Members Share Posted August 9, 2012 The point is about not being able to defend ourselves. Are you able to address that? Feel free to take me through it step by step. I'm not as well informed as you seem to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Houchen Posted August 9, 2012 Share Posted August 9, 2012 How about being totally frozen by fear? Surely that seems rational? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.