Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 we need to say no anything in the realm of body scanners, microchips and further surveillance Wouod you care to explain to us as to why? Â Go back and read the Michael Chertoff stuff. But I think it's blindigly obvious - where does the sruveallince stop exactly? We can't really go much further. Why would anyone want to go through all that hassle at the airport nowadays? Â If you're trying to deny that people's privacy is a real and topical issue then don't bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 Why would anyone want to go through all that hassle at the airport nowadays? Because it lessens the chances of their plane exploding? Â Are we all going to be watched 24/7 on an individual basis? If so, what kind of shifts would the monitor-watchers work? Presumably there'd need to be about five or six watchers to every person, to cover shift patterns and weekends and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patiirc Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 Sorry if this has been broached. Keelan is Quagmire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 I thought Jews only existed in those snuff films from the 1940's. There's only one way to stop the NWO, we need the man called Sting.    I remember reading Fingerprints Of The Gods when I was about 15. For those who haven't heard of it, it's by "amateur archaeologist" Graham Hankcock and weaves pretty much every mysterious or inconclusive piece of archaeology around the world into one giant theory about how conventional historians had got the entire history of the world all wrong. I thought it was fucking fantastic and lapped it up.  Of course, then I grew up. And have since realised that it was all basically nonsense. But if you're too young or too foolish to be able to distinguish between real science (with peer review etc etc) and pseudo science, then it can all seem scarily plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators neil Posted March 18, 2010 Moderators Share Posted March 18, 2010 There is no piece of paper that says "my name is bob and tomorrow is world domination day". We can deduce by their actions, ideologies and writings as to what their agendas are. So what you're actually making is an assumption. You've connected a few dots here and there, and from that you've drawn the conclusion that this group is planning on being the NWO. Â Explain to me how an assumption is "the truth", because as you readily admitted, you have no hard proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angle_fan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 The dots are pretty much connected already. When You know about businesses like Monsanto and Haliburton and what they do and who runs them, things start to become blatantly obvious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members ReturnOfTheMack Posted March 18, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted March 18, 2010 His recent speech oh wait, at the Fabian Society talked about "a fair world for all" under a world system of Banking and hinted at the same thing for climate change  What a cunt! Wanting a fair world for all and an easier, more streamlined banking system and for everyone to work towards dealing with climate change together. He should be strung up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members ReturnOfTheMack Posted March 18, 2010 Paid Members Share Posted March 18, 2010 (edited) Double post, I blame Dan Brown. Edited March 18, 2010 by ReturnOfTheMack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angle_fan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 A world which they control, a banking system which they own, crippling carbon taxes applied to all of us in the hoax that it's helping to save the planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 (edited) There is no piece of paper that says "my name is bob and tomorrow is world domination day". We can deduce by their actions, ideologies and writings as to what their agendas are. So what you're actually making is an assumption. You've connected a few dots here and there, and from that you've drawn the conclusion that this group is planning on being the NWO. Â Explain to me how an assumption is "the truth", because as you readily admitted, you have no hard proof. Â In a court of law you don't need a paper confession by a killer to charge them for murder. Â There is more than enough circumstantial evidence to come to a reasonable conclusion that many of these people want a one world order. From their speeches, writings, actions, associations, whistleblowers and the fact that we ARE moving in to more of a united world. The motive can simply be described as enjoying the benefits of more moneyand more power. Edited March 18, 2010 by Keelan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 (edited) double post Edited March 18, 2010 by Keelan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angle_fan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 With a two class system, no middle classes, just the Elite at the top and and the slave class (which will be all of us) who work to pay for the select few who have geniously stolen the world from it's inhabitants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 His recent speech oh wait, at the Fabian Society talked about "a fair world for all" under a world system of Banking and hinted at the same thing for climate change  What a cunt! Wanting a fair world for all and an easier, more streamlined banking system and for everyone to work towards dealing with climate change together. He should be strung up.   This is the man that gave the control of interest rates to the bank of enlgand. When you find out he is Fabian then the term "a fair world for all" reeks of communism.  When the banking crash was caused by the very people calling for a more "streamlined banking system" then its very suspect.  Stop playing devils advocate, going out of your way to hang on the politcians every word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 (edited) double post. Edited March 18, 2010 by Keelan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelan Posted March 18, 2010 Share Posted March 18, 2010 Why would anyone want to go through all that hassle at the airport nowadays? Because it lessens the chances of their plane exploding? Â Are we all going to be watched 24/7 on an individual basis? If so, what kind of shifts would the monitor-watchers work? Presumably there'd need to be about five or six watchers to every person, to cover shift patterns and weekends and all that. Â Â Using the Detroit Bombing as an example which is now openly admitted on US media as being an Intelligence error, in that they LET him on the plane. At what point is a lapse in security at fault? Having body scanners would have done nothing because he was always going to be allowed on the plane. Â The war on Terror is extremely over-hyped and contrived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts