MPDTT Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 Just horrible. I work in Moorgate and travel in and out of London Bridge daily. I'm glad the police didn't fuck about and the extraordinary courage by members of the public was quite something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Houchen Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 The replies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members quote the raven Posted November 30, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted November 30, 2019 Well that took a long time.... it’s now being used for political point scoring... disgusting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Teedy Kay Posted November 30, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted November 30, 2019 20 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Personally, I agree with Corbyn that we should disable them rather then shoot to kill. However, when there is a potential bomb you have to make a snap decision and I think in this case the police were left with little choice but to shoot to kill. Police don't shoot to kill, they shoot to prevent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Teedy Kay Posted November 30, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted November 30, 2019 20 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Personally, I agree with Corbyn that we should disable them rather then shoot to kill. However, when there is a potential bomb you have to make a snap decision and I think in this case the police were left with little choice but to shoot to kill. Police don't shoot to kill, they shoot to prevent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Houchen Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 Or they fell down the stairs sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGIT Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Keith Houchen said: The replies... I'm not saying this to you, I'm saying it to the muppet on Twitter. The civilian has just disarmed a knife wielding terrorist, who has murdered 2 at least. Who cares what he throws out his pocket? Why is it important? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Houchen Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 To be fair, the guy was just asking if anyone had any idea, he wasn't peddling theories or anything, that was the replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEGIT Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 I don't even see why the question has to be asked. Something hanging out his back pocket hindering his running, maybe? Twitter is full of morons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted November 30, 2019 Author Share Posted November 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, Keith Houchen said: To be fair, the guy was just asking if anyone had any idea, he wasn't peddling theories or anything, that was the replies. Yeah, but he set the tone for the discussion in the way he approached the situation, right down to his "supposed" terror event comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted November 30, 2019 Share Posted November 30, 2019 (edited) 23 hours ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Personally, I agree with Corbyn that we should disable them rather then shoot to kill. Why should they shoot to kill after they've already disabled a perp? I'm pretty sure Corbyn hasn't been saying this (in public). Edited November 30, 2019 by King Pitcos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members JNLister Posted November 30, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted November 30, 2019 Proper detailed legal piece on why the attacker was in prison in the first place and why he was released when he was:Â https://thesecretbarrister.com/2019/11/30/10-thing-you-should-know-about-the-london-bridge-attacker-and-early-release/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted November 30, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted November 30, 2019 3 hours ago, King Pitcos said: Why should they shoot to kill after they've already disabled a perp? I'm pretty sure Corbyn hasn't been saying this (in public). I’ve obviously not made my point. I don’t think we should STK, unless there is real danger, such as a bomb vest. Otherwise surely it makes more sense to arrest someone in order to get more information about associated people, further terror attacks etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted December 1, 2019 Author Share Posted December 1, 2019 39 minutes ago, Hannibal Scorch said: Otherwise surely it makes more sense to arrest someone in order to get more information about associated people, further terror attacks etc. It also gives the Government the added bonus of being able to release them at a later date so they can cause more havoc. I'm not one for the death penalty normally, but in instances such as this I have no problem with a zero tolerance approach from trained professionals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Hannibal Scorch Posted December 1, 2019 Paid Members Share Posted December 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, David said: It also gives the Government the added bonus of being able to release them at a later date so they can cause more havoc. I'm not one for the death penalty normally, but in instances such as this I have no problem with a zero tolerance approach from trained professionals. This guy murdered people. He’d have gotten life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.