jimufctna24 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 Has the "comedy legend in his 70s" been revealed yet?  Is that the national institution who'd blow the minds of everyone if it came out? I think I may have just guessed who that maybe. The reaction to it being revealed maybe a touch of frost  I am worried that Mike Baldwin maybe named next after Barlow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Maverick Posted May 1, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 1, 2013 Has the "comedy legend in his 70s" been revealed yet?  Is that the national institution who'd blow the minds of everyone if it came out? I think I may have just guessed who that maybe. The reaction to it being revealed maybe a touch of frost  I am worried that Mike Baldwin maybe named next after Barlow There were surely better clues available than "touch of frost," you plonker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimufctna24 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 There were surely better clues available than "touch of frost," you plonker! No need to call me a plonker, go fall through a bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimufctna24 Posted May 1, 2013 Author Share Posted May 1, 2013 It shows I do not visit the darker areas of the internet much. Â Just google searched the guy I had in mind as "the national treasure in his 70's" and there is a shit load of rumors from a decade ago he was involved in shady activity. Even people suggesting he is on top of the list to get busted next. When you type his name into google the first thing that is next to his name on the search bar is "paedo" And there is a shit load on Twitter if you search. Â I really hope it is all bollocks, but I expect him to be pubically named soon if current form is to be believed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimo the great Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 The stuff about "he who mustn't be mentioned" turned out to be crap didn't it?  On the same site that started the rumour it was disputed I was the instigator who arranged and provided crucial evidence that had tarnow, sear and Cardiff jailed. At no time was "he who mustn't be mentioned" aware of the ongoing activities which happened at his property whilst he was filming Inspector Icey in Yorkshire. Sear knew "he who mustn't be mentioned" from the London gliding club and offered to house sit and look after DJ's 3 legged dog named peg. It was while DJ was away filming that sear and tarnow would bring boys to his house and abuse them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members wandshogun09 Posted May 1, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 1, 2013 Ken Barlow and Rolf Harris I can cope with. Just. Not Count Duckula though. Please let this rumour be shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Houchen Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 So, all these decades-old allegations now coming out - what's the crack with that, then? Did the police have information on them previously and just think 'naaaaaa, can't be arsed' until the need arose to overcompensate for inaction their over Savile, or are the alleged victims of all these unconnected celebrity oddballs all just conveniently coming forward with allegations at the same time? I find the whole thing increasingly bizarre.  A lot of past victims now feel like they can come forward, without being laughed at or not taken seriously. Who the fuck in a position of power was listening to a 15-year-old girl's word vs. that of a celebrity in the sixties? It's not coincidence, more that it's a snowball effect. The more victims that come forwards, the more who were too afraid to before find the strength to do so themselves. This times a thousand.  Apologies for abuse and rape in society are still massive but back then? Fucking hell, they thought they could get away with anything and not consider it getting away with anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freaky Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Stuart Hall's admitted sex assaults on children as young as 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 He's restricted to his house and put on the sex offenders register. Take THAT paedohpilia! Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Coconut Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 He's restricted to his house and put on the sex offenders register. Take THAT paedohpilia! Â Â And no unsupervised noncing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Chest Rockwell Posted May 2, 2013 Moderators Share Posted May 2, 2013 He's restricted to his house and put on the sex offenders register. Take THAT paedohpilia! Â Â Â That's the conditions of his bail... sentencing is in June. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Callum1993 Posted May 2, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 2, 2013 What I don't get about the Bill Roache case is that why would a woman who would now be in her sixties decide to report it now? nearly 50 years later. The mind boggles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Jaffa Posted May 2, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 2, 2013 What I don't get about the Bill Roache case is that why would a woman who would now be in her sixties decide to report it now? nearly 50 years later. The mind boggles. You are stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted May 2, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 2, 2013 What I don't get about the Bill Roache case is that why would a woman who would now be in her sixties decide to report it now? nearly 50 years later. The mind boggles. Â It certainly does - at how somebody can still be asking this fucking question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Callum1993 Posted May 2, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 2, 2013 I understand that obviously she would want to report it as it's a terrible ordeal. But why wait almost 50 years? It's not as if Bill Roache was a household name in 1967 so that no one would believe her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.