Michelle McCool

[AJS269]

what are your opinions on TNA allowing Daffney firing Daffney while she was injured?

 

In English please ?

 

I just find it piss funny that you were the one calling TNA scum bags for not booking Daffney after she was injured, but then praise Paul Heyman when most of his wrestlers broke their backs for his company and ended up in debt because he wouldnt pay them. Your such a hypocrite.

 

I'm not saying Heyman is a great Person, hell as a guy he is a prick. I praise the guy as a booker not as a business owner. Or is this too complicated a concept for you to handle.

The difference is TNA is a bigger much better funded company that refuses to pay for medical citing "budget problems" then spend vast sums bringing in Z list celebs that do nothing for there ratings.

[air_raid]

There's a rotten corner of the IWC (is that phrase still around?) that puts that storyline up there with Austin/Rock or Batista/Triple H as one of the great compelling feuds.

 

I reckon it gets praised because by mainstream womens wrestling storyline standard, it was a fairly original idea. What gets lost in the kerfuffle of how good the idea/storyline was, is that the match was utter gash, no pun intended. I'd definitely knock one out over Mickie, however.

 

Michelle wouldnt get a look in, usually because she's stood next to Layla. Hubba hubba.

[Smeg_&_The_Heads]

That' is something I've never got why watch a women's match if all you want to do is fantasise about screwing them if that is the case wouldn't it be better to just watch porn.

[WWFChilli]

Mickie was the more over worker, and her angle with Trish was the best modern women's angle, it was different and unique idea for the Divas. They sort of did a test run version minus the lesbian aspect with Victoria in 2002 but Victoria dodn't really carry it as much.

 

McCool is much better on the ring, her work is very tidy considering the car crashes that some of the Divas put us through. She is a charisma vacuum though. Not bad on commentary on occasion but cutting live promos and being the wind up bully with Layla always grated me, her voice was just fucking painful to deal with, she just sounded awful everytime she spoke.

 

Mickie, much more over as a character which I guess does mean more in some aspects than being a good worker in WWE, McCool is very good and she clearly calls alot of the matches she works if not all, James was badly prone to botching alot.

 

Mickie did have boss theme music though.

 

EDIT, I did a Mickie on alot of that spelling there, late night lack of sleep

[AJS269]

That' is something I've never got why watch a women's match if all you want to do is fantasise about screwing them if that is the case wouldn't it be better to just watch porn.

 

Because thats seemingly acceptable but wanting to watch them WRESTLE is a bad thing

[TAFKA Family Guy PMSL]

That' is something I've never got why watch a women's match if all you want to do is fantasise about screwing them if that is the case wouldn't it be better to just watch porn.

 

Clearly you misunderstand my point then.

[IANdrewDiceClay]

I praise the guy as a booker not as a business owner. Or is this too complicated a concept for you to handle.

Why did you try and defend his business record compared to Bischoffs then? If thats not what your were going for? Again, zero consistancy from your good self.

 

The difference is TNA is a bigger much better funded company that refuses to pay for medical citing "budget problems" then spend vast sums bringing in Z list celebs that do nothing for there ratings.

So because TNA can afford to pay for it, means Heyman doesnt have to? TNA pays for appearance fees, pays royalities for action figures, PPV bonuses. ECW never did when they got in the shit. I like how you are picking certain things you think you can defend and ignoring the rest of it because you have no defence for it. Now I think you may understand the initial reason why I used the Heyman/Bischoff thing as an example for the McCool/Mickie thing. You've just proved me right. Its one-sided opinions based of favouritism. The Daffney/ECW thing just proved me right. Your trying to find a difference in TNA not booking Daffney anymore and ECW not paying the wrestlers who performed in ridiculous stunt matches for him proves that.

[Smeg_&_The_Heads]

That' is something I've never got why watch a women's match if all you want to do is fantasise about screwing them if that is the case wouldn't it be better to just watch porn.

 

Clearly you misunderstand my point then.

 

What point you admitted the only reason you like to watch McCool wrestle is so you can wank off during her match

[TAFKA Family Guy PMSL]

That' is something I've never got why watch a women's match if all you want to do is fantasise about screwing them if that is the case wouldn't it be better to just watch porn.

 

Clearly you misunderstand my point then.

 

What point you admitted the only reason you like to watch McCool wrestle is so you can wank off during her match

 

Don't think I did like, but whatever.

[Ron Simmons]

I swear to christ, this "Mickie played the psycho-stalker character like an Oscar winner" opinion that turns up every now and then really bugs me. Average on the mic, a decent but not great and subsequently insanely overrated storyline with Trish and.... well that's it. There's a rotten corner of the IWC (is that phrase still around?) that puts that storyline up there with Austin/Rock or Batista/Triple H as one of the great compelling feuds. Well that corner is a lonely and probably very sticky place and I have no plans to nestle in there.

 

In short, Mickie James is fucking awful. Just abhorrent.

Whoah, I'm not saying she played the gimmick like an Oscar winner. There's a difference between saying that, and saying she played it well - which is what I actually said. I personally think she played the gimmick well and I enjoyed it, so it would stand to reason that I'd like her. She's kind of lost me a little with her absolutely horrendous "Hardcore Country" stuff, but I can overlook that to say that I actually did enjoy her. I don't think anyone's trying to suggest her feud with Trish was up there with Rock/Austin and Batista/Triple H (well, not anyone that I'm aware of anyway...) but it was an enjoyable little feud, and probably one of the best diva feuds of the brand split era.

[AJS269]

I praise the guy as a booker not as a business owner. Or is this too complicated a concept for you to handle.

Why did you try and defend his business record compared to Bischoffs then? If thats not what your were going for? Again, zero consistancy from your good self.

 

The difference is TNA is a bigger much better funded company that refuses to pay for medical citing "budget problems" then spend vast sums bringing in Z list celebs that do nothing for there ratings.

So because TNA can afford to pay for it, means Heyman doesnt have to? TNA pays for appearance fees, pays royalities for action figures, PPV bonuses. ECW never did when they got in the shit. I like how you are picking certain things you think you can defend and ignoring the rest of it because you have no defence for it. Now I think you may understand the initial reason why I used the Heyman/Bischoff thing as an example for the McCool/Mickie thing. You've just proved me right. Its one-sided opinions based of favouritism. The Daffney/ECW thing just proved me right. Your trying to find a difference in TNA not booking Daffney anymore and ECW not paying the wrestlers who performed in ridiculous stunt matches for him proves that.

 

You win again Ian, bully for you. Wonder why its so important to you to dissect every opinion that even slightly opposes yours?

 

On another note, interesting that WWE for used McCool's retirement to get Kharma over, better than an offensive skit involving sex toys like they used last time a Diva retired a heel.

[TAFKA Family Guy PMSL]

I praise the guy as a booker not as a business owner. Or is this too complicated a concept for you to handle.

Why did you try and defend his business record compared to Bischoffs then? If thats not what your were going for? Again, zero consistancy from your good self.

 

The difference is TNA is a bigger much better funded company that refuses to pay for medical citing "budget problems" then spend vast sums bringing in Z list celebs that do nothing for there ratings.

So because TNA can afford to pay for it, means Heyman doesnt have to? TNA pays for appearance fees, pays royalities for action figures, PPV bonuses. ECW never did when they got in the shit. I like how you are picking certain things you think you can defend and ignoring the rest of it because you have no defence for it. Now I think you may understand the initial reason why I used the Heyman/Bischoff thing as an example for the McCool/Mickie thing. You've just proved me right. Its one-sided opinions based of favouritism. The Daffney/ECW thing just proved me right. Your trying to find a difference in TNA not booking Daffney anymore and ECW not paying the wrestlers who performed in ridiculous stunt matches for him proves that.

 

You win again Ian, bully for you. Wonder why its so important to you to dissect every opinion that even slightly opposes yours?

 

On another note, interesting that WWE for used McCool's retirement to get Kharma over, better than an offensive skit involving sex toys like they used last time a Diva retired a heel.

 

Who's the bitterest man in the thread right now?

 

Lita's retirement was entirely suitable to her character. The ultimate comeuppance for a top-notch heel manager during the high-point of Edge's heel run, Lita shouldn't have wanted it any other way.

[Snitsky's back acne]

At least I could knock a wank out to Michelle McCool.

 

So you admit for you that's all she was useful for

 

 

I'd say I'd made that pretty clear from the outset.

 

 

you admitted the only reason you like to watch McCool wrestle is so you can wank off during her match

 

Don't think I did like, but whatever.

[WWFChilli]

I praise the guy as a booker not as a business owner. Or is this too complicated a concept for you to handle.

Why did you try and defend his business record compared to Bischoffs then? If thats not what your were going for? Again, zero consistancy from your good self.

 

The difference is TNA is a bigger much better funded company that refuses to pay for medical citing "budget problems" then spend vast sums bringing in Z list celebs that do nothing for there ratings.

So because TNA can afford to pay for it, means Heyman doesnt have to? TNA pays for appearance fees, pays royalities for action figures, PPV bonuses. ECW never did when they got in the shit. I like how you are picking certain things you think you can defend and ignoring the rest of it because you have no defence for it. Now I think you may understand the initial reason why I used the Heyman/Bischoff thing as an example for the McCool/Mickie thing. You've just proved me right. Its one-sided opinions based of favouritism. The Daffney/ECW thing just proved me right. Your trying to find a difference in TNA not booking Daffney anymore and ECW not paying the wrestlers who performed in ridiculous stunt matches for him proves that.

 

You win again Ian, bully for you. Wonder why its so important to you to dissect every opinion that even slightly opposes yours?

 

On another note, interesting that WWE for used McCool's retirement to get Kharma over, better than an offensive skit involving sex toys like they used last time a Diva retired a heel.

 

dissect the opinions because it's a discussion forum, I can't stress that enough.

 

Oh and fuck off, your acting like a child.

 

That's my Vincent run in over and done with

[Mr. Seven]

Lies. It was offensive. I was offended. There were tears and everything.