Paid Members chokeout Posted February 9, 2012 Paid Members Posted February 9, 2012 Is Iron Sky the same one thats had a trailer out for about 2 years as a way of drumming up finance? Quote
iamtheman Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Is Iron Sky the same one thats had a trailer out for about 2 years as a way of drumming up finance? since 2008 according to wikipedia( they took it to cannes). financed by four different production companies Quote
Loki Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 Trailer There was never just one looks ok. intersting with finney and allen being there Well, we knew that as Jason Bourne kept meeting (and killing) other members of the group. This is probably just a legacy-pissing exercise, but IF it's got the same director, it could be quite good. Quote
iamtheman Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 (edited) Trailer There was never just one looks ok. intersting with finney and allen being there Well, we knew that as Jason Bourne kept meeting (and killing) other members of the group. This is probably just a legacy-pissing exercise, but IF it's got the same director, it could be quite good. tony gilroy (who wrote all the bourne films) is directing this. so at least he knows the material. which apparantly i dont. dont know what the hell made me forget. haven't seen any of them in a while. just seemed to me to be a silly tagline which just seems to emphasize that they couldn't get damon back for this one. Edited February 9, 2012 by iamtheman Quote
The Curious Orange Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 (edited) It's a different director, as Paul Greengrass isn't involved - if he was there's a good chance Matt Damon would've come back to do another. But it is directed by the bloke who did the screenplay for all three, and who also directed Michael Clayton - so even without Greengrass I'd still put it in the could be quite good camp. edit- beaten to it. Edited February 9, 2012 by The Curious Orange Quote
METAL ON METAL Posted February 9, 2012 Posted February 9, 2012 This is probably just a legacy-pissing exercise, but IF it's got the same director, it could be quite good. Different director, which is why Matt Damon isn't in this one because he didn't want to do it without Paul Greengrass (who didn't want to make another one) directing. Tony Gilroy (screenwriter of all four Bourne films) is directing this one. Quote
GalaxyV.2 Posted February 10, 2012 Posted February 10, 2012 They've said they have left it open for Damon to return to the franchise when he wants. I think he gave his blessing to the film being made. I presume that, depending on if its a success, Renner will egt another film, and then maybe for the 6th one they will have the two of them in one. Could be interesting, the Bourne films are great so I have high hopes. Quote
Moderators Chest Rockwell Posted February 10, 2012 Moderators Posted February 10, 2012 Billy Connolly cast in "The Hobbit" will play Dain Ironfoot. the staunchest and toughest of the dwarves. not expected to appear till part 2 Part 2? FFS can no one make just a single standalone film of reasonable length these days or what? This will be boring and shit like LOTR, where it should be much better (just like the Hobbit is a million times better book than LOTR). Quote
Loki Posted February 10, 2012 Posted February 10, 2012 Re: Blade Runner sequel, how do people feel about the possibility of Harrison Ford/Deckard being in it? On the one hand, I like films with ageing heroes. On the other... he's meant to have died. Cos he's a replicant. So, how would that work? Quote
Paid Members chokeout Posted February 10, 2012 Paid Members Posted February 10, 2012 Haven't they already said Ford isn't involved? I like that the first film is so open to interpretation. A sequel with him in it would ruin that Quote
Paid Members ReturnOfTheMack Posted February 10, 2012 Paid Members Posted February 10, 2012 Re: Blade Runner sequel, how do people feel about the possibility of Harrison Ford/Deckard being in it? On the one hand, I like films with ageing heroes. On the other... he's meant to have died. Cos he's a replicant. So, how would that work? A slightly different model in the same range. Deckard 1.2. Quote
iamtheman Posted February 10, 2012 Posted February 10, 2012 Really like the look of this doesnt have a uk release date yet though Quote
Loki Posted February 10, 2012 Posted February 10, 2012 Re: Blade Runner sequel, how do people feel about the possibility of Harrison Ford/Deckard being in it? On the one hand, I like films with ageing heroes. On the other... he's meant to have died. Cos he's a replicant. So, how would that work? A slightly different model in the same range. Deckard 1.2. An older, shitter model? Quote
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted February 11, 2012 Paid Members Posted February 11, 2012 Trailer. A superhero film we can all agree with, I feel. Starring the lad from Malcolm in the Middle as the hero, with DIAMOND DALLAS PAGE as the lead bad guy with half his face burnt off and with a supporting cast of Roddy Piper, Adam West and Stan Lee. Sounds like the big blockbuster of 2012. Quote
Trevor Posted February 14, 2012 Posted February 14, 2012 GHOSTBUSTERS 3 NEWS!!!! Source: AV Club. Newswire Dan Aykroyd now saying he'll just recast Bill Murray's part in Ghostbusters 3 by Sean O'Neal February 13, 2012 The spring of 2012 approaches and with it the promise, after months of seeding with rumors and watering with anguished tears and vodka, that Ghostbusters 3 will finally take root, sprouting a whole new branch of the franchise that you can then jab into your eye. And as it Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.