Fashion

[WU LYF 4 LYF]

Theres a machine that can test your unconcious reactions to sexualised images; John Barrowman, for example, was tested and showed zero reaction to women. No sexual attraction whatsoever.

Is it the same one Jeremy Kyle uses for his 'Lie Detector' results?

I'll try that one on my wife but I doubt it'll fly.

Convention.Who wants to live for years only penetrating the vaj/anus of one person? Must get boring.

[Chest Rockwell]

It really doesn't matter who you have it with.

I'll try that one on my wife but I doubt it'll fly.I have to admit I find the combination of pretentious prose and entry-level philosophy quite hilarious in June's posts.

He actually used the phrase "totalitarian regime" the other day.

[Devon Malcolm]

Convention.Who wants to live for years only penetrating the vaj/anus of one person? Must get boring.

There's more to life than constantly chasing pussy.

[Loki]

Who wants to live for years only penetrating the vaj/anus of one person? Must get boring.

Not really, but then it sounds like I'm a lot better at it than you are.

[WU LYF 4 LYF]

He actually used the phrase "totalitarian regime" the other day.

The funniest thing is that by demeaning my posts on politics of philosophy in such a way, you are in fact revealing yourselves to be the intellectual snobs (something that you accuse me of being) who place value in terminology over content, and believe that not everyone should have a voice. In what way would you re-describe the term 'totalitarian regime'? Please, educate us all like we know you're capable of.For people so uninterested in what they wear, the likes of Chest certainly place more emphasis on style than substance when discussing history, politics or culture. Unless he's just using tired old exclamation marks to convey false mock surprise, betraying his own stylistic inadequacies.

Not really, but then it sounds like I'm a lot better at it than you are.

A real zinger there. I already anticipated the selfsame reply a couple of posts back: "Of course, the token response to this by people who pretend they have lots of sex is that 'you can't be doing it properly'.".Surely an intellectual heavyweight like yourself would have tried a different tack, knowing I'd preempted your argument?And Gladstone (Or can I call you 'Stalker'? It's getting creepy), life is full of contradictions and half-truths, is it not? Or is that merely me being a pretentious, pseudo-intellectual twat?Since you presume yourselves to be highly intelligent people (which by insinuating that others are stupid is what you are indirectly doing), why not sit yourselves a test?- Why does the prose in which I write my posts bother you?- Why do you dislike men who take an interest in fashion?- Why do you feel the need to insult somebody who never insults anyone?- Why do you respond with hate and gang up on someone who never fights back? Does this amount to bullying?- Why do you not put the offending poster on ignore?- Why do you spend so much time responding to somebody you profess to hate?1,000 words, sixty minutes. I'll be paying close attention to the style of prose, the grammatical correctness and the clothes you wear while you write. Do not use the usual trick of skipping most of the questions, and only responding to only one, to which you make an attempt at uninspired humour or attempt to personally insult or disparage someone.

[carolann]

.Fucking teenage girls taking over this forum.

I'm 32

[Halitosis Romantic]

I don't follow fashion. That'd be a joke. You know I'm going to set them, set them. So everyone can take note.

[ReturnOfTheMack]

Theres a machine that can test your unconcious reactions to sexualised images; John Barrowman, for example, was tested and showed zero reaction to women. No sexual attraction whatsoever.

Is it the same one Jeremy Kyle uses for his 'Lie Detector' results?

Only if he measures blood flow to the penis as part of his test. To be totally fair I think the machine could probably be fooled. I wouldnt take it as read that it works.

Who wants to live for years only penetrating the vaj/anus of one person? Must get boring.

Been ten years nearly with only my wife, still not boring. In fact it gets better every year.

[Devon Malcolm]

And Gladstone (Or can I call you 'Stalker'? It's getting creepy), life is full of contradictions and half-truths, is it not? Or is that merely me being a pretentious, pseudo-intellectual twat?

I think if you replaced that 'or' with an 'and' you would be absolutely spot on.

[Chest Rockwell]

He actually used the phrase "totalitarian regime" the other day.

The funniest thing is that by demeaning my posts on politics of philosophy in such a way, you are in fact revealing yourselves to be the intellectual snobs (something that you accuse me of being) who place value in terminology over content, and believe that not everyone should have a voice. In what way would you re-describe the term 'totalitarian regime'? Please, educate us all like we know you're capable of.For people so uninterested in what they wear, the likes of Chest certainly place more emphasis on style than substance when discussing history, politics or culture. Unless he's just using tired old exclamation marks to convey false mock surprise, betraying his own stylistic inadequacies.

Yeah.. to reiterate for the third time now, I am quite fashion conscious, so this fantastic irony you've pointed out doesn't really wash.

[WU LYF 4 LYF]

I'm 32

I was being sarcastic in reference to an earlier poster who claimed those interest in the latest fashions were simply 'teenage girls'.

I think if you replaced that 'or' with an 'and' you would be absolutely spot on.

Just sit the test, no other talking is necessary.

Yeah.. to reiterate for the third time now, I am quite fashion conscious,

Douchebag.

[carolann]

I'm 32

I was being sarcastic in reference to an earlier poster who claimed those interest in the latest fashions were simply 'teenage girls'.

Gutted... Thats like the guy in Asda asking for ID for alcohol then saying he could see i was old enough but he had to as it was part of the job.

[Devon Malcolm]

I'm 32

I was being sarcastic in reference to an earlier poster who claimed those interest in the latest fashions were simply 'teenage girls'.

Gutted... Thats like the guy in Asda asking for ID for alcohol then saying he could see i was old enough but he had to as it was part of the job.

Sorry about that.

[NEWM]

You're good you June. Threads with your posts in are almost always a tremendous read because you bring out the best in everybody else on here.

 

I'm not going to pick on particular parts of your posts, because you're generous and give people millions and millions of things to rip apart without me jumping on. All that said though, I reckon it's as simple as saying you're just young. I don't mean that to sound so patronising, because I'm 26, and I'm sure I remember you being in your early twenties, but you sound just like pretty much any opinionated 16 year old ever ever. There's an enormously hearty dose of confident single-minded know-it-all to every single one of your posts no matter what the subject, and I hope they survive long through the years on this forum, because I bet the years will pass and you'll look back and read them with a blush and a smile at some of this shit.

 

Look at me, talking like a billy big bollocks when some 35 year old is probably thinking I'm a right condescending know-all. It never ends.

 

The important thing is, don't stop. You come across as a bellend about 95% of the time, but your comfort in seemingly knowing that is pretty bloody admirable, if I'm honest. One day, that will either make you a great adult or a member of the 27 club. And I like I said, makes for some ace reading. So thanks.

[WU LYF 4 LYF]

All I have is opinions. Unconventional opinions, offensive opinions, incomprehensible opinions, whatever, I just write these fucking things down, it's just how I'm feeling at the time. I don't go back and browse through old threads so I won't suffer embarrassment. I'm an instinctive person. Someone called me 'A-Level' but a lot of the pseudo-intellectuals on here who think they're better/cleverer/worth more than me are just the sort of University students the professors hate, who show no originality, are afraid to write a statement unless they can footnote it to Camus or some other philosopher, who just weigh up other people's arguments and provide none of their own.

 

I'm the opposite, I've read Plato, and bits and bobs of other philosophy, and a fuck load of Utopias, but I don't feel the need to mention I've read them, I just take in what I see in the world and offer opinions based on that. Who gives a fuck about philosophy and 'florid style' anyway? The very same people who accuse me of being a pretentious dick, and nobody else. The hypocrisy in humanity is predictable yet still jarring. Chest Rockwell criticised my style, but when I criticised his he had nothing to say. He laughed at me using the phrase 'totalitarian regime', one he is apparently above, but failed when asked to come up with alternative wording. He loves hating on other people because it makes him feel better about his own deficiencies. In this way he is like many people.

 

Why do people think so negatively? Why do they constantly insult me when I do not insult them back? They are like bullies in a playground, buzzing round every post, not to argue with it, but to pick out one part they can try and get their friends to laugh out, or just to plain insult me. Why are they so disparaging? Why do they not simply ignore me? Because they hate people like me, who have an opinion and state it and couldn't care less what anybody else feels. It's like Big Mickey - nearly every thread he goes in he gets accused of being a racist because of his political views. Why does it anger people so much what he thinks? Why does it hurt them? Why do they have to be so condescending?

 

That none of the questions I asked earlier were answered showed that these people are nothing but bullies, who criticise the opinions of others but have nothing themselves to ass when the person counterpoints them.

 

I'm not some sixteen year old naive cunt. I'm a 22 year old, who's travelled the world, got a 2:1 from a University ranked 8th out of 150 in the country on a course with AAA entry requirements. People will pick up on this sentence as the one to disparage and laugh at from my post ("look at him with his airs and graces," ironically from the same people who believe themselves to be intellectually superior). I say it only as evidence that I am not an uneducated idiot. These are the views of an educated person. They are my views. You can find them ridiculous or offensive or whatever, but these are the products of my experience of the world. I'm not saying them out of ignorance, this is genuinely how I feel. You probably think this is even more scary, that someone can have had some of the best education in this country and still think the way I do. Well, that's the way it is.

 

In real life I'm a pretty personable bloke; I've got assessment days at two of the top accountancy firms in the country in the next couple of months. There's no guarantee I'll get the job, indeed it's pretty unlikely in the current climate and without much experience of a economically based degree, but to even get to the assessment day you have to get through phone interviews and aptitude tests and past dozens of other candidates. I'm not blowing my here trumpet at all, though I'm aware that it sounds like I am. I'm just saying that if I come across as a 'moron' on here then it is a misconception. My views may be moronic but I have an active brain and others see that. Of course, in real life I do not spout such radical and unconventional views except to my friends, so I in some ways don't ask for trouble as much. [No doubt people will still reply to this post with 'what a pretentious cunt' now I've talked about university and jobs and somewhat bigged myself up - my advice is don't bother, I won't read them].

 

Yet while I'll admit my posts have been controversial, written in ways that demand a heated argument against, I certainly don't believe myself to have been deserving of the barrage of personal abuse. Disagree with my opinions, but those who use the words 'moron', 'twat', 'cunt', 'idiot', 'wanker' with such frequency are only demeaning themselves rather than the person they're hoping to humiliate. There is no call for personal attacks; they reveal merely the hatred, bitterness and insecurities only natural in some people who spend their lives in the uncool hobby of following wrestling and browsing forums. They think they're better than the activities they partake in, so are either hateful or condescending to compensate. The majority of the forum, I'm happy to say, is made up of people happy with who they are, who see no need to be offensive, derisory or hateful to others. If they disagree with a post, they'll argue it politely. If they dislike a poster, they'll ignore them. That's the way it should be.

 

I personally don't even mind personal attacks if they're funny and by a sole person. When it isn't in the least amusing (although it often tries to be) is scornful bullying by groups of people at once, something that has no place in any society (and something no doubt influenced by the perpetrators own experiences of bullying as a child, which they will of course deny because in reality they care far more than me about whether people on this forum consider them 'cool'). For those who have ganged up and insulted me, I'm finally going to fight back say say fuck you (pretentious italics for emphasis), and if/when I become a a rich, disillusioned 9-5 accountant who has foregone all his principles, I'll be at least gleeful that bullies like yourselves will life and die with nothing more than hatred and bitterness, because your minds were constantly polluted with negative thoughts.

 

I'm not perfect. I'll probably never become the famous author I want to be (nor in all probability will all of the many other aspiring writers on here). I often come across as a dick, I usually say the wrong thing, I'm hopelessly vain and sometimes treat people like shit. I love attention and love getting a reaction out of people. Now, I'm not perfect, but there's a good chance (though it's nothing like a sure thing) that one day I'll be somewhat successful (I've got the grounding), and if I manage to get into accounting I'll probably make a fuck load of money. If I do manage to grasp that invisible ring, I'll know that I stuck by my convictions, was honest with myself and people around me (even if it meant getting abused for it). And I'll not be disappointed if I'm still depressed now and again, since I've said time and time again money doesn't make you happy. I've got a lifestyle now that most people would kill for, and that's why I'm generally content. Content to laze around all day, browsing the internet, eating junk food, drinking, doing the odd drug, travelling, enjoying life in the knowledge that one day, probably someday soon, I'll have a job and responsibilities and will look back on this as a golden period in my life.

 

Don't pick up typos, I wrote this as a chain-of-though reply to bring closure on the 'offensive, pretentious twat' gimmick I have so enjoyed playing. I've not checked it for quality of prose Chest (perhaps you can mark it and PM it to me so I can improve as a writer and maybe one day even reach your lofty standards?), or grammar, or if I've accidently written the wrong word in my haste. Because there's surely better things to do than proof read a post on a forum that exists to discuss oiled up men in underpants pretending to fight.

 

Sayanora.