King Pitcos Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 It's definitely not D'Lo. Just a random fella who looks like Ernest Miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted June 12, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted June 12, 2013 Looking at it now, it isn't D'Lo! D'Lo took a load of bumps through tables, but not at the Rumble. Fuck knows who this bloke is. The bump was nasty, so obviously the weren't keeping him around. "Fill your boots Ahmed, he's not working any house shows". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted June 12, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted June 12, 2013 It is a nasty bump for someone they just hired for the night, must have been a local wrestler. All the fucking monitors fell on him as well, they never cleared them off in those days! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reznor Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I remember asking that same question a while back; Wonder who the dude was who went through the table at the 97 rumble, that was quite a fair bump that. From watching Ahmed's shoot it was his friend from the Indy's who owned him money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hallicks Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 Why is Sheamus so protected? When he was wrestling Barrett every week, I think Barrett won clean once. Maybe twice tops. Out of about 20 matches. When he was up against the shield he never seemed to take the fall either. It wouldn't hurt him to take the odd loss here and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted June 13, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted June 13, 2013 If everyone loses nobody gets over. Why didn't they beat the Shield instead? They dont ever take a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Maverick Posted June 13, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted June 13, 2013 Why is Sheamus so protected? When he was wrestling Barrett every week, I think Barrett won clean once. Maybe twice tops. Out of about 20 matches. When he was up against the shield he never seemed to take the fall either. It wouldn't hurt him to take the odd loss here and there.Because he's their next big babyface after Cena, no harm but you ask questions that seem from somone who doesn't follow the product? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanoTheGame Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 Watching Raw last night, I mostly came away thinking; who is the one lumberjack guy, standing with his back to the hard camera? Grey vest with 'Queens' on the front and yellow boots/shorts iirc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 (edited) Answer to that Raw question (well, attempted answer): Â <-- click on 'spoiler' to show/hide the spoiler The Usos were in yellow. Don't think they had a Queens vest though. Â [close spoiler] ");document.close(); Edited June 13, 2013 by King Pitcos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members ShortOrderCook Posted June 13, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted June 13, 2013 It was Curt Hawkins. He's got a new haircut and a new look, dubbing himself as 'The Prince of Queens' as in the place, not the bumgardners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanoTheGame Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 Cheers! The Prince of Queens is a shite nickname though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hallicks Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 Why is Sheamus so protected? When he was wrestling Barrett every week, I think Barrett won clean once. Maybe twice tops. Out of about 20 matches. When he was up against the shield he never seemed to take the fall either. It wouldn't hurt him to take the odd loss here and there.Because he's their next big babyface after Cena, no harm but you ask questions that seem from somone who doesn't follow the product?Yeah that must be it. Or maybe I'm just bored to tears of his fucking dire promos and charisma-free persona and so I find it hard to believe WWE are investing in him. I know it's a stupid question, but I was hoping that maybe, somehow, I'd missed something and there was an alternative explanation. Obviously not. I'd better start following the product more closely, cheers for the advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 I know it's a stupid question, but I was hoping that maybe, somehow, I'd missed something and there was an alternative explanation.Like what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hallicks Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 I know it's a stupid question, but I was hoping that maybe, somehow, I'd missed something and there was an alternative explanation.Like what?Maybe it's the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people under the supervision of the reverse vampires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted June 13, 2013 Share Posted June 13, 2013 There's already a thread for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts