Moderators PowerButchi Posted March 30, 2011 Moderators Share Posted March 30, 2011 Didn't Joel Gertner and his wife do a 14 year old Cookie as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted March 31, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted March 31, 2011 Yeah, they all went for it, so the rumour goes. I bet they are glad they never waited a few years, because those three wouldnt have a chance now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopper Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Yeah I've heard a few of Raven's stories that involve Amber Gertner & Cookie usually being together around the boys and often ended with them in one of the wrestlers' rooms for the night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDDUM_N_STYLE Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 bought a copy of rqw rebirth on dvd in oxfam today, anyone know if its a good show or not? its headlined by doug williams v martin stone and features drew mcintyre defending the iww title v jody fleisch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanoTheGame Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 You've already bought it, so watch it and find out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDDUM_N_STYLE Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 You've already bought it, so watch it and find out? Â i would like to know peoples opinions of the show, like those that went or had seen it before you know what i mean jackass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PowerButchi Posted April 1, 2011 Moderators Share Posted April 1, 2011 So if people say it's shit, you're going to throw it away "jackass"? Just fucking watch it. Ask later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDDUM_N_STYLE Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 So if people say it's shit, you're going to throw it away "jackass"? Just fucking watch it. Ask later. Â calm down butch, ive no problem with you mate. if its shit it will just stay hidden away in my collection, not like i shelled out big money on it (only cost me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members IANdrewDiceClay Posted April 1, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted April 1, 2011 3 quids a bit harsh in a charity shop isnt it? I thought they'd droped the videos down to 20 pence and the DVD's down to about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Mike Castle Posted April 1, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted April 1, 2011 I'd say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanoTheGame Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 You've already bought it, so watch it and find out? Â i would like to know peoples opinions of the show, like those that went or had seen it before you know what i mean jackass? Â Wouldn't it be more interesting if you watched the show first, then asked people for their opinions so you could see if you agreed or disagreed with them? It just annoys me when people say they've bought something then want opinions on it before they watch it. You've already done the hard work in parting money for it, so just pop it in and see what you think! Â Jackass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slapnut Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Were there any good wrestling April Fools' stories this morning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Bus Surfer Posted April 1, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted April 1, 2011 Watched 'The True Story of Wrestlemania' the other day. Â At WM8 it mentions originally is was to be Hogan/Flair. Why did they change their mind and go with Savage/Flair instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted April 1, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted April 1, 2011 Watched 'The True Story of Wrestlemania' the other day. Â At WM8 it mentions originally is was to be Hogan/Flair. Why did they change their mind and go with Savage/Flair instead? I've heard it was because of Hogan's decision to "retire". Flair beating Hogan at WrestleMania was a no-no and putting Hogan over a drawing card only for him to walk away was also a no-no. So apparantly they switched it so Hogan wouldn't have to lose and they could end WM with their babyface winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Ronnie Posted April 1, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted April 1, 2011 Watched 'The True Story of Wrestlemania' the other day. At WM8 it mentions originally is was to be Hogan/Flair. Why did they change their mind and go with Savage/Flair instead? I've heard it was because of Hogan's decision to "retire". Flair beating Hogan at WrestleMania was a no-no and putting Hogan over a drawing card only for him to walk away was also a no-no. So apparantly they switched it so Hogan wouldn't have to lose and they could end WM with their babyface winning. Meltzer has said in the past that it's because their house-show run was receiving only tepid reactions, so McMahon determined that he would need to programme something else in the main event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts