Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted May 25, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 25, 2013 (edited) I was just interested in what specific crime he's being questioned about. I swear I haven't seen it listed? Just that's he's been nicked. They usually say, "on suspicion of" or whatever. Edited May 25, 2013 by SpursRiot2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted May 25, 2013 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Can't you just be arrested "under the terrorism act", same as with mental health? He's been arrested under suspicion of terrorist activity anyway, however it was worded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted May 25, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 25, 2013 "On suspicion of saying shit we don't like, motherfucker!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Surf Digby Posted May 25, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 25, 2013 Can't you just be arrested "under the terrorism act", same as with mental health? No. Section 44 of the Terrorism Act was repealed as police were using it willy-nilly to stop, search, detain and arrest anyone they didn't like the look of and couldn't find any other offense that would stick. These days they have to have at least a justifiable inkling that the suspect is doing something terroristy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 I was just interested in what specific crime he's being questioned about. I swear I haven't seen it listed? Just that's he's been nicked. They usually say, "on suspicion of" or whatever. Â http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/woolwich-a...-held-1-2944892 Â Abu Nusaybah, who was interviewed on BBC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Coconut Posted May 26, 2013 Share Posted May 26, 2013 That's the sort of thing we expect MI5 to do, right? Otherwise what's the point in them. Yeah, no need for concern there. How else is an Oxbridge suit supposed to get information? Apart from sellotaping a beard to his face and heading off to Mali, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Decided to keep this out of the Woolwich murder thread so as not to derail it. Same here. Check this shit out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members SpursRiot2012 Posted May 28, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 28, 2013 Is there ever a terrorist attack that isn't a false flag thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Is there ever a terrorist attack that isn't a false flag thing? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King Of Swing Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Everything is a false flag or in some way related to the Satanic Jew Lizards attempts to conquer the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 The only thing that I find confusing is the distinct lack of blood on either of the attackers. I mean, I'm no expert, but surely trying to sever someone's head is going to cause some blood spatter on clothing, no? Aren't there main arteries involved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Ronnie Posted May 28, 2013 Paid Members Share Posted May 28, 2013 (edited) Aren't there main arteries involved? Sure, but there'd only be spattering if the heart were still pumping, wouldn't there? If the victim died during the earlier part of the attack (being hit by a car and then stabbed) severing his head would cause blood to leak but there'd be no arterial spray, hence getting it all over the hands but nowhere else. Edited May 28, 2013 by Ronnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Aren't there main arteries involved? Sure, but there'd only be spattering if the heart were still pumping, wouldn't there? If the victim died during the earlier part of the attack (being hit by a car and then stabbed) severing his head would cause blood to leak but there'd be no arterial spray, hence getting it all over the hands but nowhere else. I guess so. I have to admit, I've never been in that position, so any lack of blood may look weird to the untrained eye I guess (I did think that when I saw the guy talking on camera with the victim in the background, again with no blood to be seen). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Pitcos Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 If the all-powerful nWo are already controlling everything, why do they need to bother with false flag operations? And how, if they're omnipotent enough to rule the world, do all of their schemes have these obvious flaws that are so easily spotted by the mentally ill? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 They dragged the guy into the street after killing him. If you look at the early arial shots of the scene, there's just a vast amount of blood around the car and smeared across the pavement. Where the body ended up is not where he bled to death. And as Ronnie said, if the heart had stopped by the time they tried to cut his head off, you'd get blood all over your hands but not splattering around. Â Also, loads of people saw them do it. I mean, it's just a small thing, but there were about a hundred eyewitnesses to the attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.