JakeRobertsParoleOfficer Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 I was re-watching Matt Hardy's TNA debut and i cant see what all the hate about his physique is about.? He has a physique most guys on theUK scene would love to have and to me he deosnt look that bad. He certainly looks no worse that Mr Anderson and defo looks better than Sting (who has been wearing that singlet for years to cover that sagging physique) or even i'd argue Angle. Â Why the hate guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted January 14, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted January 14, 2011 It's Friday, so it must be time for another JakeRobertsParoleOfficer new thread marathon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smegma Cake Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 His physique isn't as bad on his TNA debut than it was for the latter part of his WWE career. Its not just the fact he looked overweight, but his entire look hasn't changed for years and if he didn't throw a hissy fit about it everytime someone publicly slagged him off, no-one would care either way. I used to mock my brother constantly for having literally a giant noggin, but as soon as he stopped throwing a fit and joined in with the slaggings, it wasn't as fun anymore. Same thing with Hardy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 I'd say the hate is directed towards him mainly because of what he says & does outside the ring, including his fucking youtube video account. Â Maybe if he spent less time talking to a videocamera, and more time in the gym he wouldn't get as much grief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted January 14, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted January 14, 2011 I'd say the hate is directed towards him mainly because of what he says & does outside the ring, including his fucking youtube video account. I think that's exasperated the hate. I think everyone realised a long time ago that he was getting slower and slower and then fatter and fatter. Rather than admit he doesn't have it anymore, he choses to make sad little videos of himself making excuses for his shitarseness. Prick. Â And he didn't look fine on the PPV, he looked as fat as ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mojo Rising Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 Have not seen any photos of Matt's debut on TNA and seeing as he has been sat around for 90 days doing nothing but posting crappy videos online, I would have expected him to a least improve his look for his debut. However, in the latter stages of his WWE he looked awful .... so much, so I wanted the WWE to bring back the whole Matt Hardy will he make the weight angle (circa 2001-2002). Â As for Sting he is slightly different. I am certain it is been mentioned in a number of articles that he no longer lifts heavy weights and has been 'clean' for a number of years. Also for 51 (15 Years older than Matt) I think he looks in pretty decent shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeRobertsParoleOfficer Posted January 14, 2011 Author Share Posted January 14, 2011 I was re-watching Matt Hardy's TNA debut and i cant see what all the hate about his physique is about.? He has a physique most guys on theUK scene would love to have and to me he deosnt look that bad. He certainly looks no worse that Mr Anderson and defo looks better than Sting (who has been wearing that singlet for years to cover that sagging physique) or even i'd argue Angle. Why the hate guys?  Thats abit uncharitable Gladstone. I've barely posted in the last few months and have also tried to improve the quality of my post(s)  JRPO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members martyngnr Posted January 14, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted January 14, 2011 He certainly looks no worse that Mr Anderson and defo looks better than Sting (who has been wearing that singlet for years to cover that sagging physique) or even i'd argue Angle. Behave yourself. Â Sting gets a pass as he had more good matches than Matt Hardy has had hot dinners - and we know how hungry Hardy is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Freebird Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 I think it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spotlightmagnet1 Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 As for Sting he is slightly different. I am certain it is been mentioned in a number of articles that he no longer lifts heavy weights and has been 'clean' for a number of years. Also for 51 (15 Years older than Matt) I think he looks in pretty decent shape. Â Sting is in pretty good shape, I remember back in 2006 Sting tried that new 'look' and he looked very good. He might of let himself go a little bit in the interim but then he's had to put up Russo's turning him every 6 months for two years so I'd forgive the comfort eating. Â I liked Matt Hardy, I really did. I even think he did a respectable job putting Drew McIntyre over with the head injury storyline. The reason I hate Matt Hardy started whn I watched the OMEGA documentary and he told the world 'In my mind if I went out with a girl for any period then my friends shouldn't go out with her even afterwards', and then ran down Joey Abs for falling in love with Matt's ex and 'We cut off all connections with him'. I just thought he was a dick. Â And then I watched his youtube clips and decided here was a clearly bitter and possibly insane wanker. The reason I would get on his weight so I can steal someones nicknames for the Hardys, Fatt and crystal Meth Hardy. Â Little things please little minds, which is why I don't like Hardy. Boom Boom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Stain Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 He reminded me of dear Anne Widdicombe on Strictly when he waddled into TNA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members MoChatra Posted January 14, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted January 14, 2011 His midrift doesn't resemble that of John Morrison but it's still smaller than it was about six-eight months ago. He looked like he was expecting sextuplets back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Devon Malcolm Posted January 14, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted January 14, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reznor Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 I actually agree. I've only really started watching the wrestling again in the last few months after drifting away from it over the past 2 or 3 years, so i haven't saw him in ages. But i have read about him getting it pretty tight on places like here, so i was kinda expecting that he had ballooned into some seriously grotesque, flabby fatboy. So i watched this talked about match in TNA, and was pretty surprised to see that, looks-wise, he wasn't too bad. A bit tubby, but hardly the obese man i was half expecting. If anything, his crap attire, and lack of any elbow pads, wrist tape etc were far more detrimental to his overall look than his paunch. Basically, listening to you lot was like listening to the Brain leading up to Warrior's return at WM12 Â However, when the bell rang it was another matter entirely, and in that respect, i would agree with those criticising him. He looked terrible, lazy and moved like someone whose knees were shot like Muta or the Iron Sheik at the gimmick battle royal (ok, maybe a bit of an exaggeration on that one). I'd be surprised if it was his knees though, as give or take a moonsault busted out a few times per year, his knees were pretty well protected. If there was a part of his body he was struggling with, i'd suspect it would be his lower spine/tailbone from all those nutty legdrops he used to bust out in those gimmick matches. They couldn't have been kind to him at all. Â So yeah, in ring, he looked like shit. He was always far less athletic and agile than Jeff, albeit he could still bust out things like top rope lionsaults and the like. But time, and that period of Hardy Boy madness from around 99-02 looks to be catching up with him. Â On the other side of the coin, i haven't saw RVD in a couple of years either, but he still looked pretty good. I kinda figured that he'd be starting to show his age and slowing down a bit, but he just looks much the same as he has for the last 5/10 years. He must be getting on a bit too, i'm aware of him in that WCW lightheavyweight division with Pillman, Brad Anderson, Scotty Flamingo etc and that can't be far off 20 years ago. Why's he out of the WWE anyway - fired for being a stoner, or resigned by his own choice? They could really be doing with someone like him just now imo. With losing Shawn Micaels and to a lesser extent Jeff hardy last year, i feel they badly need one or two flashy, pretty boy faces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted January 14, 2011 Share Posted January 14, 2011 I think RVD looks a lot slower now than he used to, but I put that down to not really being arsed about the TNA crowds. He stalls a lot more, spends more time than ever doing his thumb thing, and gets around the ring slower. To be expected, but a little disappointing, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.