Jump to content

The Fortean/paranormal/conspiracy thread


Astro Hollywood

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
I'm sure that was the video that has been discussed in at least two documentaries, where the relevant experts couldn't prove that it was a man in a suit, and had to admit that they didn't know what the fuck it was? :confused:

 

At least two?!

 

There have been dozens of documentaries (and books) about that footage over the years. It's my classic example for giving the same level of analysis to explanations as we do the mysteries themselves, what with so many random people claiming, without proof, to have been inside or been behind the suit over the years, to try and make a name for themselves, while the two men involved haven't changed their story in 45 years.

 

Not to paint myself as a kook, but one thing definitely in its favour is the fact that in all of those reconstructions, and the many, many obviously faked Bigfoot videos over the years, nothing has come close to imitating the realism of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Everything from the movement of the creature to the suit itself, if it is fake, is still light years ahead of anything else that's out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least two?!

Well, two that I've seen anyway. I'm not a big follower of this kind of stuff.

 

Did you see the new one on National Geographic the other night? They were saying that the bone structure pretty much rules out any chance of it being of a human in a suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Paid Members
I'm sure that was the video that has been discussed in at least two documentaries, where the relevant experts couldn't prove that it was a man in a suit, and had to admit that they didn't know what the fuck it was? :confused:

 

At least two?!

 

There have been dozens of documentaries (and books) about that footage over the years. It's my classic example for giving the same level of analysis to explanations as we do the mysteries themselves, what with so many random people claiming, without proof, to have been inside or been behind the suit over the years, to try and make a name for themselves, while the two men involved haven't changed their story in 45 years.

 

Not to paint myself as a kook, but one thing definitely in its favour is the fact that in all of those reconstructions, and the many, many obviously faked Bigfoot videos over the years, nothing has come close to imitating the realism of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Everything from the movement of the creature to the suit itself, if it is fake, is still light years ahead of anything else that's out there.

This footage has been discussed in this very thread at least once. It's worth doing a search and finding the posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure that was the video that has been discussed in at least two documentaries, where the relevant experts couldn't prove that it was a man in a suit, and had to admit that they didn't know what the fuck it was? :confused:

 

At least two?!

 

There have been dozens of documentaries (and books) about that footage over the years. It's my classic example for giving the same level of analysis to explanations as we do the mysteries themselves, what with so many random people claiming, without proof, to have been inside or been behind the suit over the years, to try and make a name for themselves, while the two men involved haven't changed their story in 45 years.

 

Not to paint myself as a kook, but one thing definitely in its favour is the fact that in all of those reconstructions, and the many, many obviously faked Bigfoot videos over the years, nothing has come close to imitating the realism of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Everything from the movement of the creature to the suit itself, if it is fake, is still light years ahead of anything else that's out there.

This footage has been discussed in this very thread at least once. It's worth doing a search and finding the posts.

Cheers, I'll do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

David icke not happy with jesse ventura

 

From his facebook

 

 

What a wonderful day I had in Cleveland, Ohio, which turned out to be a great success despite the best efforts of the organiser.

 

But in the days before the event I was pestered by someone called Michael Braverman, connected to the Jesse Ventura 'show' called Conspiracy Theories, on the totally inappropriately-titled truTV, in which Ventura or the voiceover can rarely go a few sentences without reminding everyone that he is a former Navy Seal. Wow, stands back in amazement - how incredible, a former Navy Seal. I feel fit to faint, I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...