Paid Members Chris B Posted March 14, 2021 Paid Members Posted March 14, 2021 And the downplaying of emotional and physical abuse of women.
DavidB6937 Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 I don't think the AEW roster is the problem anymore.
Paid Members FLips Posted March 14, 2021 Paid Members Posted March 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, DavidB6937 said: I don't think the AEW roster is the problem anymore. How do you solve a problem like the UKFF Roster?
RedRooster Posted March 14, 2021 Author Posted March 14, 2021 3 hours ago, danlewis said: Because people who accuse others of virtue signalling are almost exclusively right wing and exclusively twats. The Other people have kind of pointed this out already, but you don’t tend to see left leaning people attack others, accusing them of ‘virtue-signalling’. The term itself is used almost entirely by the right, generally to belittle people who have more compassion than they do. I’m not accusing you of lacking compassion, I don’t know you. But if you’re using the term ‘virtue-signalling, it’s probably important for you to know why it exists.
robinbobs Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 3 hours ago, danlewis said: Because people who accuse others of virtue signalling are almost exclusively right wing and exclusively twats. This is a wrong fact
BrodyGraham Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 9 minutes ago, robinbobs said: This is a wrong fact Nah, he's just speaking his truth and the shared truth of quite a few people.
robinbobs Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 10 minutes ago, BrodyGraham said: Nah, he's just speaking his truth and the shared truth of quite a few people. The truth will always set you free
robinbobs Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 29 minutes ago, RedRooster said: The term itself is used almost entirely by the right. Can you back this up with statistical analysis or is this just what you think?
danlewis Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 Fuck me, I think we have one of the ‘facts don’t care about your feelings’ lot! Look, your argument was that you thought that Havoc had just ‘been a cunt’ rather than a rapist and that being glad he was fired was virtue signalling. No way did you not realise that he’d ‘been a cunt’ to women and what that implies otherwise exactly what virtue do you think was being signalled? So, you’ve subtly tried to change the subject like the worst sort of twitter prick, even though virtue signalling is specifically a term used by the right to denigrate the left. I mean, it has no meaning the other way. So, instead of arguing in bad faith, why don’t you do something about your problems with women? Then fuck off. Then come back with Jimmy Havoc. Then both fuck off again.
RedRooster Posted March 14, 2021 Author Posted March 14, 2021 9 minutes ago, robinbobs said: Can you back this up with statistical analysis or is this just what you think? I’m almost certainly feeding a troll by answering you, but here’s an analysis of the term from The Conversation, a publication consisting of research-based articles written by academics. Go nuts.
DavidB6937 Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 This topic has bombed harder than the end of the last PPV.
robinbobs Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 11 minutes ago, danlewis said: Fuck me, I think we have one of the ‘facts don’t care about your feelings’ lot! Look, your argument was that you thought that Havoc had just ‘been a cunt’ rather than a rapist and that being glad he was fired was virtue signalling. No way did you not realise that he’d ‘been a cunt’ to women and what that implies otherwise exactly what virtue do you think was being signalled? So, you’ve subtly tried to change the subject like the worst sort of twitter prick, even though virtue signalling is specifically a term used by the right to denigrate the left. I mean, it has no meaning the other way. So, instead of arguing in bad faith, why don’t you do something about your problems with women? Then fuck off. Then come back with Jimmy Havoc. Then both fuck off again. I’m probably gonna go have dinner to be fair but you crack on
robinbobs Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 9 minutes ago, RedRooster said: I’m almost certainly feeding a troll by answering you, but here’s an analysis of the term from The Conversation, a publication consisting of research-based articles written by academics. Go nuts. Nice will read it thanks for sharing
RedRooster Posted March 14, 2021 Author Posted March 14, 2021 On 3/12/2021 at 8:53 PM, Tsurutagun said: The 2nd show on TNT I would make an womens exclusive show. Back on topic, I like this idea, but given how little airtime their female roster gets right now it’s certainly a risky move. I’d also worry it would end up being an hour of wrestling catered to the niche tastes of Kenny Omega. They definitely need to do more with their female roster, there’s definite talent there and surely the goal of any company these days should be working towards something that resembles a gender balance in their roster make-up.
Sphinx Posted March 14, 2021 Posted March 14, 2021 32 minutes ago, DavidB6937 said: This topic has bombed harder than the end of the last PPV. I thought the problem was it didn't bomb hard enough?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.