Paid Members Murtz Posted July 28, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted July 28, 2011 Not opinions of my own, but of someone who has been watching wrestling for 20 odd years. He said that Cena is bigger than Stone Cold and The Rock purely because of how he has been head and shoulders above the rest at the top of the WWE for over 6 years now, and at only 34, he's got plenty more years ahead of him. Its in those years where we might find out if he can be bigger than Hogan. The likes of Stone Cold and The Rock only spent a few years at the top, but the general opinion is that they were better in those few years than Cena has been in the last 6. So my question is, is 'Better' always 'Bigger'? And, do you guys think that the only reason The Rock and Stone Cold were deemed to be 'better' than Cena was because of the bookers and amount of quality talent they had to work with? Discuss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.