Baz Windham Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 So are they physically filmed onto anything like a disc or is it all digital? and what's the difference between that and filming on film? All this talk has got me curious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members chokeout Posted February 16, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted February 16, 2011 So are they physically filmed onto anything like a disc or is it all digital? and what's the difference between that and filming on film? All this talk has got me curious  It depends on what they are filming with. Standard used to be tape (which are the bigger betamax style. they'd record the feed from each camera seperate as well as from the desk (which is what you see on tv) Now I should imagine its digital media (not worked in a studio since about 2001) When you use film its just like when you used to take a photo, it has to be developed before you can see/use it. You then have to physically put the pieces together by hand to edit them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Snow Posted February 17, 2011 Share Posted February 17, 2011 Film has not been put together by hand for years, Chokeout. NOT to say some old school editors still don't practice the method however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members chokeout Posted February 17, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted February 17, 2011 Film has not been put together by hand for years, Chokeout. NOT to say some old school editors still don't practice the method however. Â Thats not entirely true. You can edit offline from a work print but this still produces a cut list which is put together by a negative cutter. For low budget film shoots using 16 or 35mm they are shot on film and developed onto tape to edit from, this is usually to save on processing fees. Many big studios do digitize the footage to edit but quite a lot of editors (Sally Menke being a prime example before she snuffed it) still use a 35mm work print to edit on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Out Media Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Interesting to see a release that will largely contain 4:3 footage being released on Blu-Ray. When it comes to the older extras, do you guys think they'll maintain the 4:3 aspect ratio or try to stretch and squash them into 16:9? I hope it's the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members neil's bitch Posted February 18, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted February 18, 2011 Interesting to see a release that will largely contain 4:3 footage being released on Blu-Ray. When it comes to the older extras, do you guys think they'll maintain the 4:3 aspect ratio or try to stretch and squash them into 16:9? I hope it's the former. On older footage dont they add the little side borders on to keep it in original ratio? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
METAL ON METAL Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Interesting to see a release that will largely contain 4:3 footage being released on Blu-Ray. When it comes to the older extras, do you guys think they'll maintain the 4:3 aspect ratio or try to stretch and squash them into 16:9? I hope it's the former. Â For Blu-Ray, the old footage will likely be 4:3 with the typical WWE bars along each side. Just an educated guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillerTwist Posted February 23, 2011 Share Posted February 23, 2011 Best of RAW Seasons 3 and 4 has been cancelled: Â http://www.wwedvdnews.com/news-wwe-dvds-ca...led-2011/10206/ Â I'm unhappy about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baz Windham Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 I'm gutted, loved the first set and would have definately got 95/96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 Best of RAW Seasons 3 and 4 has been cancelled:Â http://www.wwedvdnews.com/news-wwe-dvds-ca...led-2011/10206/ Â I'm unhappy about that. Â That's a shame, I was waiting to start collecting from 95 onwards as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members The Ratt Posted February 26, 2011 Paid Members Share Posted February 26, 2011 WWF Year in Review 1993/1994 now showing as available for pre order on silvervision's site  http://www.silvervision.co.uk/products/The...VD-2-Discs.html  I remember the 1993 video being decent, but 1994 featured too much from that years PPV's  A bit gutted that they seem to have missed out the 1992 dvd as that was probably the best of the lot, as it also included the full Flair - Savage title switch from days after SummerSlam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitCrusherr Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 WWF Year in Review 1993/1994 now showing as available for pre order on silvervision's site http://www.silvervision.co.uk/products/The...VD-2-Discs.html  I remember the 1993 video being decent, but 1994 featured too much from that years PPV's  A bit gutted that they seem to have missed out the 1992 dvd as that was probably the best of the lot, as it also included the full Flair - Savage title switch from days after SummerSlam  According to a quote on the SilverVision facebook page a day or two ago, the master tape for '92 is beyond repair. Such a shame, I really wanted it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RepoMan Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 From their Facebook page: Â "Silvervision.co.uk The 1992 master tape is beyond repair I'm afraid " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion_Deathlock Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 The '93 year in review is greatest home video of all time. Because of this:- Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 The '93 year in review is greatest home video of all time. Because of this:-Â Â If that didn't get you over in '93, nothing would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.