Paid Members tiger_rick Posted January 7, 2008 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2008 Vote for the UKFF's Most Under-rated Poster of 2007.Discussion allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Chest Rockwell Posted January 7, 2008 Moderators Share Posted January 7, 2008 I still think this award is retarded and meaningless... you guys could have totally come up with a better new category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members tiger_rick Posted January 7, 2008 Author Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2008 It's not new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopper Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 It's not new.I guess he meant a new category to replace this old one.I chose PurpleMonkeyDishwasher because he's a great poster who didn't get many nominations in the Poster of The Year award. Therefore, under-rated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultimo the great Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Not sure on this one but i voted Legend Killer, he's a movie fan and a red. Plus he doesn't post crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tequila_Boy Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Freaky Jason, posts some moderately good stuff, plus I keep actually thinking he is John Tickle rather than just looking like him, and John Tickle is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Supremo Posted January 7, 2008 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2008 (edited) Alot of great candidates. It was between him and purplemonkey, but I eventually went with d-d-d-dAz. Edited January 7, 2008 by Supremo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paid Members Duke Posted January 7, 2008 Paid Members Share Posted January 7, 2008 How can people be both poster of the year and yet under rated candidates? Noone's *that* good, surely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shimmer Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 (edited) I voted for d-d-d-dAz, but all those nominees are exceptional posters. Edited January 7, 2008 by Shimmer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d-d-d-dAz Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Naturally, I voted for myself...However, I think that everyone on that list (myself not included) is a fantastic poster in their own rights. So, you know, if it wasn't for me under nurtured ego i'd totally voted for at least one of the other candidates. Â Now, excuse me, whilst I run to the library. Â If a hundred or so votes are cast from Leicester DMU library it has NOTHING to do with me. Beaste is just gay for me, that's all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigBoot Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 (edited) This is tough because all of the ones mentioned are good posters. I Edited January 7, 2008 by TheBigBoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Chest Rockwell Posted January 7, 2008 Moderators Share Posted January 7, 2008 How can people be both poster of the year and yet under rated candidates? Noone's *that* good, surelyThe same thing happened last year when $tew was up for this award as well as Poster of the Year. I don't mind it there's some good posters in this one here, it does seem strange though.This is what I meant - it's like some bizarre runner up prize to Poster of the Year with its own nominations (just to clarify that when I said the award was retarded I didn't mean to imply any of the posters nominated for it were bad posters)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mab Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Were am I on the list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnySaint_Fan Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 You mean "where am I on the list?".Also, how the fuck are you 30 years old? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mab Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Does it really matter that I used Were instead of Where?I'm actually 27, not 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts