Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Paid Members
Posted
1 hour ago, Mowgli said:

Not sure whether it's amazing but it is a lot better, in my opinion, than the first one. 

You'll be pleased to know I went to see it anyway because of the heavy Ralph Fiennes stuff in the promo and it was the right decision. If the first was a 3/5 for me, the sequel was a 5/5. 

  • Members
Posted

I only saw 28 Days Later for the first time last year, and thought it was great, an incredibly tense affair and it made me strangely nostalgic.

Weeks was absolutely shit, had far too much Jeremy Renner for a start and not even Rose Byrne could save it.

Years was alright, but fell off a cliff big time after he takes his Mum over, and the films structure and tonal shifts were just too off putting.

From everything I've read on the latest one, sounds like I wouldn't enjoy it, but when has that ever stopped me.

 

  • Awards Moderator
Posted (edited)

We saw Bone Temple at the weekend and much preferred it to last year’s film. There were definitely some gore scenes where I had to look away and still felt a bit ill, but overall thought it was excellent. It does some interesting and unexpected things, in a good way. Ralph Fiennes is superb.
 

Spoiler

And the ‘Number of the Beast’ sequence made me want to applaud in the cinema. Absolutely mad and I loved it.

The ending made me excited for what comes next rather than the “what was that??” of Years. And I liked that (intentionally or not) there are quite a few laughs in this one despite the grim subject matter. 

Edited by HarmonicGenerator
Old Nick told me to
  • Paid Members
Posted
15 hours ago, Lorne Malvo said:

You lot are all mad, reading this back. The first half of 28 Years Later with Aaron Taylor-Johnson doing his shitty 'please cast me in a Ken Loach film!' audition is easily the worst half of the film! As soon as Spike and his mam leave the island business picks up.

Agreed. Especially on Taylor-Johnson, one of the worst actors consistently employed in high profile films around. He's absolutely never good.

  • Paid Members
Posted

I thought Bone Temple was alright. All the Fiennes/Alpha stuff was really good while the Jimmy cult stuff felt fairly weak and under developed. I don't really rate Alex Garland very much as a writer - he has good ideas but rarely knows how to flesh them out.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...